[Qvqnubpj]

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/%E9%95%B7%E...XN0Aw--;_ylv=3

長毛兩票之微得保議席

星島日報 – 11小時前

相關內容

• 查看相片長毛兩票之微得保議席

(綜 合報道)(星島日報報道)社民連立法會議員梁國雄早前衝擊有關「遞補機制」的公眾論壇，被法庭判監兩個月， 旅遊界立法會議員謝偉俊昨在立法會內務委員動議 啟動罷免程序，褫奪梁國雄的議員資格，動議最終被否決。梁國雄在表決後表示問心無愧，並說：「大部分政治犯 都坐過監。」而提出討論的葉國謙強調，並非針對 個別議員，只是要討論立法會是否要按《基本法》規定作出安排。
　　立法會內會昨日在葉國謙的提出下，討論是否要啟動罷免程序，褫奪梁國雄議員資格，並由謝偉俊提出有關動 議，但最終以十六票贊成、十八票反對和一票棄權被否決。
　　葉國謙強調，並非要針對個別議員，而是認為要討論立法會是否要按照《基本法》規定，作出相關安排。而曾 因被判監而被解除議員資格的金融服務界議 員詹培忠表示雖與梁國雄政見不同，但不會幸災樂禍，亦同時不會討好社會。他認為，是否啟動罷免程序，應考慮 三方面因素，包括《基本法》規定、如何向公眾交 代，和立會是否一視同仁。
　　泛民力挺 信不涉私利
　　民主派議員均反對罷免梁國雄，民主黨張文光表示，法官在判決時已指出梁國雄的做法並不涉任何個人利益， 因此該黨不贊成由立法會投票遞奪他的議員 資格。民協馮檢基同樣認為，應由選民決定梁國雄應否接受處分，而非由立法會決定。工黨李卓人則表示，梁國雄 是獲部分選民授權衝擊制度，如奪去梁國雄的議 席，等同奪去他所代表的市民表達意見之機會。
　　梁國雄在動議被否決後，指會服從法官的判決坐監，又表示對自己的行為問心無愧。他指，立法會部分議員以 法庭的決定攻擊他，是庸俗的表現。他又感謝市民對他的聲援，「否則我個人不可能與龐大的國家機器抗爭」。本 報記者







Of long-haired two votes micro insurance seats
Sing Tao Daily, Sing Tao Daily - 11 hours ago
Related content

The long-haired two votes micro get insurance seats to view photos

Of long-haired two votes micro insurance seats

(Roundup) (Sing Tao Daily reported) LSD Legislative Council member Leung Kwok-hung earlier impact on the by-mechanism "public forum, the court sentenced to imprisonment for two months, tourism legislator Paul Tse was launched yesterday in the House Committee of the Legislative Council motion recall program, deprived of Mr Leung Kwok-hung's qualifications, the motion was eventually rejected. Leung Kwok-hung, said after the vote, a clear conscience, and said: "Most political prisoners have been in prison." Discussed IP Kwok-him, to emphasize, not individual members, but to discuss the Council whether according to the Basic Law provisions to make arrangements.

Legislative Council proposed in the IP Kwok-him yesterday to discuss whether to start the removal procedure and deprivation of the qualifications of Leung Kwok-hung, on motion by Paul Tse, but in the end by 36 in favor, 18 votes against and one abstention was rejected.

IP Kwok-him, stressed, not to individual members, but to discuss whether the Legislative Council in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Law, to make the relevant arrangements. Had one sentenced to prison relieve a Member of the financial services sector HONOURABLE different political views and Leung Kwok-hung, but will not gloat, not to curry favor with social. In his view, whether to start the removal procedure, should consider three factors, including the provisions of the Basic Law, and how to explain to the public and the legislature be treated equally.

Pan-China behind the letter does not involve self-interest

Democratic lawmakers oppose the removal of Leung Kwok-hung, the Democratic Party Cheung Man-kwong said that the judgment, the judge pointed out that Leung Kwok-hung's practice does not involve any personal interest, so the party is not in favor of delivery won his in membership vote by the Legislative Council. The ADPL Frederick FUNG Similarly, Leung Kwok-hung should accept the punishment, rather than decided by the Legislative Council shall be decided by the voters. Labour Lee Cheuk-yan, Leung Kwok-hung were part of the electorate authorized the impact of the system, such as take away the seats of Leung Kwok-hung, claimed he represented the public the opportunity to express their views equivalents.

Leung Kwok-hung, after the motion was rejected, that would obey the judge's decision to prison, also said that their actions have a clear conscience. He was referring to some Members of the Legislative Council to the court's decision to attack him, vulgar performance. He thanked the public for his solidarity, "otherwise I can not with the huge national machine struggle. The reporter