Reply to Thread New Thread |
11-23-2010, 11:22 PM | #21 |
|
Actually a Chinese controlled puppet regime might be the best thing possible in NK. One of the necessities of life in NK (necessity as in, you don't want to starve to death) is black market trade with smugglers who deal in goods/food smuggled in from China. NK's know people on the Chinese side are comparatively wealthy. In fact, it's relatively easy for people to cross the border into China depending on your profile (People who are obviously fleeing, like families, would not fit this profile). Most non-officers in the NK army are paid like 12th century serfs and they make a side business with the smugglers for access. However, if you cross and recross without making a deal, you're going to NK prison camp, along with your grandparents, parents, children, cousins, nieces, and nephews and the border guards will take all your stuff anyway. Furthermore, if you get nabbed by the Chinese authorities, with no bribe money, you're going to be forcibly repatriated and sent to prison camp, which is usually a slow-death sentence. |
|
11-23-2010, 11:31 PM | #22 |
|
Yeah, the cruelty is unbelievable. You can be in some distant village and an uncle you haven't seen in 20 years can piss off a local party apparatchik and the next thing you know you and your whole family are chopping and hauling logs in 10 degree weather for 12 hours a day and living off tree bark and toads. And that's considered a "good" camp.
Another measure of just how weird and bizarre the Kim regime is...say...someone hears you make an utterance in English for whatever reason, and reports you to the party. Usually this could land you in a prison camp. But, at some point, you or a relative had the foresight and connections to send the Kim family some money, liquor, or ginseng that you harvested and, as luck would have it, the Kim's sent you an official letter of praise in return. Well, that letter can be entered in as official evidence which, as long as your "crime" isn't too serious (disparaging the Kim's) you might just be reassigned for 6 months of re-education at a local camp rather than have your whole family hauled away to one of the more terminal ones. |
|
11-23-2010, 11:49 PM | #23 |
|
Yeah, the cruelty is unbelievable. You can be in some distant village and an uncle you haven't seen in 20 years can piss off a local party apparatchik and the next thing you know you and your whole family are chopping and hauling logs in 10 degree weather for 12 hours a day and living off tree bark and toads. And that's considered a "good" camp. |
|
11-24-2010, 12:00 AM | #24 |
|
|
|
11-24-2010, 12:12 AM | #25 |
|
I saw the same doc about the eye doctor, it's a good one. In NK you can be publicly executed or sent to a camp for drawing the Great Leader. Only select artists, licensed by the NK state, are allowed to depict the Great Leader and his family. |
|
11-24-2010, 12:48 AM | #26 |
|
I'm not sure...was it Lisa Ling's sister, Laura?
Lisa Ling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
|
11-24-2010, 03:00 AM | #27 |
|
|
|
11-24-2010, 09:00 AM | #28 |
|
It looks like this is going to be link to the future of North Korea leadership
(LEAD) Defense chief links N. Korea's artillery attack to its power succession North Korea's bombardment on a populated South Korean island was probably a politically calculated provocation in part to help secure the ongoing succession of the North's leader-in-waiting, the youngest son of leader Kim Jong-il, South Korea's defense chief said Wednesday. "Our judgment is that North Korea carried out the attack to consolidate the succession process in the country by showing off the leadership of Kim Jong-un," Defense Minister Kim Tae-young told lawmakers, referring to the communist state's heir apparent. |
|
11-24-2010, 05:11 PM | #30 |
|
I'm not sure...was it Lisa Ling's sister, Laura? |
|
11-24-2010, 05:12 PM | #31 |
|
|
|
11-24-2010, 05:24 PM | #32 |
|
|
|
11-25-2010, 03:43 AM | #33 |
|
Fear not, the cavalry is soon to arrive on station via the USS G Washington carrier task force. When it is in place, it will do
absolutely nothing. S Korea just had a warship sunk by N Korea with a loss of 46 hands, and they ate it. This recent thing is just posturing for the new 26 yr old newly promoted 4 star general from seaman recruit. And N Korea needs more face time with us as well. Gotta hand it to the north, they do have a pair. |
|
11-25-2010, 05:18 AM | #34 |
|
I doubt we would "eat" a USN vessel being attacked. It's gunboat diplomacy and the perfect situation for it.
This recent thing is just posturing for the new 26 yr old newly promoted 4 star general from seaman recruit. Are you that guy who claimed he was once a sergeant in the Navy to me while I was in uniform? Cuz that's the same sort of mistake. |
|
11-25-2010, 05:50 AM | #35 |
|
Some stars are aligning...China has now officially denounced NK and with the US navy in the area there's a real show of force.
If China decides NK's too much of a threat to keep propping them up, pretty much everybody else in the region would go at them with unrepentant glee. And who would stand to gain? SK and Japan would lose a constant threat hanging over their heads, SK would get a highly-skilled low-cost workforce, and SK and Japan would get a common ground to help talk their differences out...heck, even China would gain from having NK's markets being forcibly opened. Japan's military force, remember, is kept in check by the 1945 agreements (and amendments thereto) which spell out exactly how much military power Japan can accrete and what they can use it for. North Korea, right now, is one dumb move from being wiped off the map. Literally. |
|
11-25-2010, 06:16 AM | #37 |
|
I doubt we would "eat" a USN vessel being attacked. It's gunboat diplomacy and the perfect situation for it. |
|
11-25-2010, 06:27 AM | #38 |
|
Glad to hear China is putting the brakes on, though not unexpected. No one over there needs new grief to include Russia.
It would be a help however if S Korea could grow a pair. Even China and Russia would second that emotion. As US protectorates S Korea and Israel are quite the same, except that Israel would have hit back pronto. As much as Israel pisses me off I'll give them that. |
|
11-25-2010, 08:00 AM | #40 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|