LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-24-2009, 07:44 PM   #1
Vezazvqw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default Beyond Ridiculous
Quangos blackball ... oops, sorry ... veto ‘racist’ everyday phrases - Times Online

It could be construed as a black day for the English language — but not if you work in the public sector.

Dozens of quangos and taxpayer-funded organisations have ordered a purge of common words and phrases so as not to cause offence.

Among the everyday sayings that have been quietly dropped in a bid to stamp out racism and sexism are “whiter than white”, “gentleman’s agreement”, “black mark” and “right-hand man”.

The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has advised staff to replace the phrase “black day” with “miserable day”, according to documents released under freedom of information rules.

It points out that certain words carry with them a “hierarchical valuation of skin colour”. The commission even urges employees to be mindful of the term “ethnic minority” because it can imply “something smaller and less important”.

The National Gallery in London believes that the phrase “gentleman’s agreement” is potentially offensive to women and suggests that staff should replace it with “unwritten agreement” or “an agreement based on trust” instead. The term “right-hand man” is also considered taboo by the gallery, with “second in command” being deemed more suitable.

Many institutions have urged their workforce to be mindful of “gender bias” in language. The Learning and Skills Council wants staff to “perfect” their brief rather than “master” it, while the Newcastle University has singled out the phrase “master bedroom” as being problematic.

Advice issued by the South West Regional Development Agency states: “Terms such as ‘black sheep of the family’, ‘black looks’ and ‘black mark’ have no direct link to skin colour but potentially serve to reinforce a negative view of all things black. Equally, certain terms imply a negative image of ‘black’ by reinforcing the positive aspects of white.

“For example, in the context of being above suspicion, the phrase ‘whiter than white’ is often used. Purer than pure or cleaner than clean are alternatives which do not infer that anything other than white should be regarded with suspicion.”
Vezazvqw is offline


Old 08-24-2009, 07:54 PM   #2
Enliseell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
The jackasses who made these claims are the ones linking race to what is otherwise a descriptive color. "Black mark" has nothing to do with race. I guess if a guy gets punched in the eye, you can't call it a "black eye?" What about black friday? I guess Native Americans should be upset when a company says they are "in the red." This PC bullsh*t makes me sick.

People need to lighten up. I was at a meeting last week and the office had a coffee machine that also made cappuchino. I'm Italian, and my co-worker said, "Oh, you'd like that." I didn't take offense to it. But if I had said to a black guy, "Oh fried chicken, you'd like that," I'd be labeled a racist. WTF?
Enliseell is offline


Old 08-25-2009, 03:23 AM   #3
Hofonom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
364
Senior Member
Default
They changed the name of "man whole cover" in (I think) Texas to "person whole cover" at the cost of $30 million a few years back. "Man whole cover" was deemed sexist. Jackoffs wasting our money.
Hofonom is offline


Old 08-25-2009, 09:15 AM   #4
KJnbceja

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Vera, how do you feel about the word Snatch in the dictionary?
Do you find it revolting?
It must be removed!
KJnbceja is offline


Old 08-25-2009, 04:37 PM   #5
XU8i6ysK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
They changed the name of "man whole cover" in (I think) Texas to "person whole cover" at the cost of $30 million a few years back. "Man whole cover" was deemed sexist. Jackoffs wasting our money.
man whole cover:




man hole cover:

XU8i6ysK is offline


Old 08-25-2009, 05:27 PM   #6
drycleden

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
The jackasses who made these claims are the ones linking race to what is otherwise a descriptive color. "Black mark" has nothing to do with race. I guess if a guy gets punched in the eye, you can't call it a "black eye?" What about black friday? I guess Native Americans should be upset when a company says they are "in the red." This PC bullsh*t makes me sick.

People need to lighten up. I was at a meeting last week and the office had a coffee machine that also made cappuchino. I'm Italian, and my co-worker said, "Oh, you'd like that." I didn't take offense to it. But if I had said to a black guy, "Oh fried chicken, you'd like that," I'd be labeled a racist. WTF?
drycleden is offline


Old 08-25-2009, 05:40 PM   #7
BEyng6hj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
man hole cover:

Thanks, GMonkey!

BEyng6hj is offline


Old 08-26-2009, 02:00 AM   #8
chzvacmyye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Can you still say FAT LIP?
chzvacmyye is offline


Old 08-26-2009, 02:18 AM   #9
Hofonom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
364
Senior Member
Default
Funny.

man whole cover:




man hole cover:

Hofonom is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity