LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-04-2007, 12:09 AM   #21
JosephEL

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Some Americans want Osama bin Laden to be dead. I rank Cheney as on an even lower level of scum.
OK Matt- Sion you are over board I would like to give both individuals the same "kiss"!
JosephEL is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 12:16 AM   #22
PypeMaypetasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
636
Senior Member
Default
this is no different than the lefts hub bub of a non elected official that skank implying that edwards needs rehab after hearing the word "faggot"


somehow the left was saying she called him a "faggot"

both sides make a big deal about nothing usually .......
PypeMaypetasy is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 02:22 AM   #23
accotMask17

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
333
Senior Member
Default
There will be no discussion of shooting elected officials.

Period.

Matt
Unless they are Arab or latin american. Then we can discuss shooting them all we want....

Andrew
accotMask17 is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 02:29 AM   #24
Asianunta

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
As somebody who saw the episode I can say that this thread is based on a bullshit comment. He did not say that he wishes Cheney was dead. He did say that fewer people would die if he was dead which can't really be proven one way or the other but he never said he wishes him to be dead. Personally I think the comment isn't very smart considering it is nothing but speculation but to just jump to a conclusions to start a very uncivilized discussion such as this isn't very productive and is a good example of why many are discouraged with this site.
Asianunta is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 02:50 AM   #25
newshep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
I couldn't give a toss if Cheney dropped dead tomorrow. He has a lot of blood on his hands - none of it his...
newshep is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:17 AM   #26
pkopwqzsdcvbn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
LOL! I so love when people adopt propaganda when they didn't see the comments made. What Bill Maher actually asked was why Arianna Huffington removed a post from her blog that said it was too bad that the bombs missed Cheney. He didn't voice his agreement with that. He was talking about a First Amendment issue.

Now... he did say that fewer people would be dead tomorrow, but he didn't wish Cheney dead.

Perhaps you should have watched Scarborough talk about it yesterday since he was on the same show.

As to Edwards being gay, you guys just spew vitriole about everything, don't you, even if it's a patent lie.
To the one who likes to admonish me for labelling her ......

This one of "us guys" thinks both Ann Coulter's comments and Bill Maher's comments were in poor taste.

I seriously doubt either represent the viewpoints of any but the lunatic fringe of either side of the political spectrum.
pkopwqzsdcvbn is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:18 AM   #27
pkopwqzsdcvbn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
I couldn't give a toss if Cheney dropped dead tomorrow. He has a lot of blood on his hands - none of it his...
Tsk tsk ..... careful you don't burst a vein ....
pkopwqzsdcvbn is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:22 AM   #28
Jerwittdergut

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
To the one who likes to admonish me for labelling her ......

This one of "us guys" thinks both Ann Coulter's comments and Bill Maher's comments were in poor taste.

I seriously doubt either represent the viewpoints of any but the lunatic fringe of either side of the political spectrum.
Ah... but I wasn't referring to you.

I'd say most people are comfortably in the middle, either leaning to the left or right.

I'd also say if Bill Maher had wished Dick Cheney dead, I'd have thought that extreme. But having seen the episode, it isn't what he said (though it was certainly open to that type of misinterpretation). I was listening to Scarborough talk about it last night (since he was also on the panel when Maher made his comments) and he had the same take on the statement as I do... so I'm in pretty good conservative company.
Jerwittdergut is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:27 AM   #29
newshep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
388
Senior Member
Default
Tsk tsk ..... careful you don't burst a vein ....
Huh? Not even close to bursting a vein. Just said it in a calm, remote, kinda manner....(shrug)...
newshep is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:29 AM   #30
Kokomoxcvcv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
Unless they are Arab or latin american. Then we can discuss shooting them all we want....

Andrew
Isn't that interesting. Could it be brown skin connected?
Kokomoxcvcv is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:43 AM   #31
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
and this is why no real americans take liberal Democrats seriously when they say they can protect the country from islamic radicals.
So "real Americans" don't take "liberal Democrats" seriously because I, a libertarian, said I dislike Cheney? Do explain how you connected those dots.
As long as the general public know the left feels this way they will continue to elect whoever the republican nominee is.

Varus Do explain also who the "general public," "real Americans" and I'm assuming "unreal Americans" are.
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:44 AM   #32
accotMask17

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
333
Senior Member
Default
Isn't that interesting. Could it be brown skin connected?
I don't think it is ethnically motivated, it is legally motivated. This site can't be sued by hosting death threats against any foreign leader, so it is only a rule that American leaders cannot be threatened. If anything it just exposes an ethical flaw of the site. They should be genuine and ban all threats against all people.

But hey, thats just my opinion.

Andrew
accotMask17 is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 03:45 AM   #33
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Then you're naive and stupid and need to go back to school.
And no argument from the other side. Just ad hominem.
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 05:11 AM   #34
alias

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
76
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
It's a true shame that you Libs still have NO CLUE as to who the enemies of the U.S. are. I guess it's good for you that you weren't around in the Civil War days, eh?
alias is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 05:49 AM   #35
Gymnfacymoota

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
It's a true shame that you Libs still have NO CLUE as to who the enemies of the U.S. are. I guess it's good for you that you weren't around in the Civil War days, eh?
And who is the enemy of the United States? I know that Bush's actions have caused the loss of more lives and money than bin Laden could have ever dreamed of, not to mention the loss of freedoms/rights that bin Laden or Hussein could never have accomplished. So who is the enemy of the United States if not the person who has done the most harm to it?
Gymnfacymoota is offline


Old 06-04-2007, 06:37 AM   #36
mikeyyuiok

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
I've seen the show. This thread and this right wing campaign about Maher wishing Cheney's death is utter bullshit.
mikeyyuiok is offline


Old 07-03-2007, 10:45 AM   #37
qikolax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default
Gee, Jack, don't you have anything useful to say? How about actually backing up your wild claims every once in a while?
It was said, in fact it was in 3 to 4 letter words so even you could understand it, although the Red Rubber Ball bouncing across the words optoion was available too!

I guess the Adm. here love this no good son of a bitch and chose not to print my Post! I am used to being censored and regulated here as I understand Liberals are pussies who can't handle the TRUTH!!! Help ya Nancy??
qikolax is offline


Old 07-03-2007, 10:58 AM   #38
Efksqhyu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
If it isn't a threat to do so or a solicitation for another to it is supposedly protect by the first amendment. Of course the present administration doesn't like the Constitution very much.
Efksqhyu is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity