[alias]

Oh wait, let me guess - you "forgot" to ask those same questions over in the "Al Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize" thread, correct?

Limbaugh has done FAR more to advance the cause of peace than Al Gore has ever done.

Sal, let's face it, Liberals idea of peace is: surrender. Rush's idea of peace is: VICTORY.

Instead of putting out a stupid movie that nobody has seen lying about global warming with no scientific data what so ever to back it up, Rush backs up his statements with facts. That is a foreign concept to Liberals.

[cepAceryTem]

Sal, let's face it, Liberals idea of peace is: surrender. Rush's idea of peace is: VICTORY.

Instead of putting out a stupid movie that nobody has seen lying about global warming with no scientific data what so ever to back it up, Rush backs up his statements with facts. That is a foreign concept to Liberals.

Whadaya mean no evidence Todd? Green house gases have been rising and so has the global temperature. A direct correlation...oh wait...they were rising earlier in the last century and the temperature got colder. Gosh I'm confused.

[alias]

Whadaya mean no evidence Todd? Green house gases have been rising and so has the global temperature. A direct correlation...oh wait...they were rising earlier in the last century and the temperature got colder. Gosh I'm confused.

Algore said a "consensus" of scientists came up with the false claims he states in his bombed movie. If there is a "consensus" in science, then it isn't science. Science is science.

If Algore is so sure of himself on this issue, why won't he debate scientists or others who can actually dis-prove what he says with science, and not consensus?

[KuznehikVasaN]

Algore said a "consensus" of scientists came up with the false claims he states in his bombed movie. If there is a "consensus" in science, then it isn't science. Science is science.

If Algore is so sure of himself on this issue, why won't he debate scientists or others who can actually dis-prove what he says with science, and not consensus?

Algore would prefer instead to show pictures to the gullible and listen to them gasp. In so doing, he gulls the gullible, and induces belief in his hoax.

By getting the gullible to look at pictures instead of examining the scientific data, Algore is able to win them over to his cause. It becomes, essentially, a religion for them, and he is their high priest.

[alias]

Algore would prefer instead to show pictures to the gullible and listen to them gasp. In so doing, he gulls the gullible, and induces belief in his hoax.

By getting the gullible to look at pictures instead of examining the scientific data, Algore is able to win them over to his cause. It becomes, essentially, a religion for them, and he is their high priest.

Well said!

[Peterli]

Oh wait, let me guess - you "forgot" to ask those same questions over in the "Al Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize" thread, correct?

Limbaugh has done FAR more to advance the cause of peace than Al Gore has ever done.

Are you insinuating that Sam is a liberal...?

[annouhMus]

Oh wait, let me guess - you "forgot" to ask those same questions over in the "Al Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize" thread, correct?

Limbaugh has done FAR more to advance the cause of peace than Al Gore has ever done.

Nonsense, all he has done is cause controvery. That is not usually considered "Peace" 'course they are both garbage.

[alias]

Nonsense, all he has done is cause controvery. That is not usually considered "Peace" 'course they are both garbage.

The only "controversy" he's caused is exposing Liberals as what they really are.

[annouhMus]

Algore said a "consensus" of scientists came up with the false claims he states in his bombed movie. If there is a "consensus" in science, then it isn't science. Science is science.

If Algore is so sure of himself on this issue, why won't he debate scientists or others who can actually dis-prove what he says with science, and not consensus?

If he had said a concensus of Science you would have been in the ball park. but that is not what he said. He said a concensus of SCIENTISTS this refers to their "findings" In short, that they AGREE.

[alias]

If he had said a concensus of Science you would have been in the ball park. but that is not what he said. He said a concensus of SCIENTISTS this refers to their "findings" In short, that they AGREE.

They agree, however, they have no science to back it up. If there was science, he would have said: "Scientists have proven . . . . " Why won't he speak to any real global scientists about it? The fact is, he refuses to even debate it with scientists that have proof of his lying.

[LesLattis]

Long overdue, leading talk radio host Rush Limbaugh has finally been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

He's a good pick for that award, although leftists/Stalinists probably prefer someone like Albert Gore Junior instead.

Limbaugh has been nominated for the Nobel Prize for Peace much the same way as Mickey Mouse can be a write-in candidate for office.

The nomination is half-joke and half publicity stunt by an organization of which Limbaugh is a board member.

Nominations mean nothing though. Limbaugh, Gore, or otherwise....anyone can be nominated for just about anything. Come back and post when someone actually wins the Nobel Prize. If it happens to be Limbaugh, then I will have advance notice that the apocolypse is afoot.

[casinobonusa]

I guess this the best we can do, folks. Al Gore or Rush Limbaugh...

[Gintovtosik]

Oh wait, let me guess - you "forgot" to ask those same questions over in the "Al Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize" thread, correct?

Limbaugh has done FAR more to advance the cause of peace than Al Gore has ever done.

No, I didn't forget to ask in the Al Gore thread. It just wouldn't make sense to ask what Rush Limbaugh did to deserve to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in a thread that is about Al Gore.

[corolaelwis]

rush is the most devisive warlike advocater of peace i have ever heard.

Well Clinton and Gore authorised bombing Iraq; Limbaugh only advocates it, so Limbaugh does seem more qualified for this award than others like Gore who have been nominated for "peace".

[Gedominew]

Essentially it is a matter of Limbaugh making sure he got himself nominated so he could talk about it on his radio show and discuss with his loyal brain dead followers, you know who you are Todd and apperantly Sal, how it is driving liberals up a wall. IT is a publicity stunt nothing more.

[alias]

Essentially it is a matter of Limbaugh making sure he got himself nominated so he could talk about it on his radio show and discuss with his loyal brain dead followers, you know who you are Todd and apperantly Sal, how it is driving liberals up a wall. IT is a publicity stunt nothing more.

So, he got himself nominated? If that's true, then why was he surprised when the news crossed the wire?

[Gedominew]

So, he got himself nominated? If that's true, then why was he surprised when the news crossed the wire?

And see the fact that you believed that act is why we consider you to be somewhat brain dead.

[alias]

And see the fact that you believed that act is why we consider you to be somewhat brain dead.

Riiiiggggghhhhht

[Evoryboypoto]

Limbaugh, whose daily radio show is heard by more than 20 million people on more than 600 radio stations in the United States and around the world, was nominated for the prestigious award for his "nearly two decades of tireless efforts to promote liberty, equality and opportunity for all humankind, regardless of race, creed, economic stratum or national origin. These are the only real cornerstones of just and lasting peace throughout the world," said Landmark President Mark R. Levin. Doesn't sound crazy to me. I suspect that this is a fairly accurate description of the way he thinks of what he does. Self serving? Sure, but so what?


The only two problems I see with this nomination is that by appealling to the mass market he ends up annoying some of the more pretentious among us, no offense meant . Of course that is why he is so effective.

And that his chosen way of achieving these goals is by promoting methods that disagree with the liberal consensus.

[Gedominew]

Doesn't sound crazy to me. I suspect that this is a fairly accurate description of the way he thinks of what he does. Self serving? Sure, but so what?


The only two problems I see with this nomination is that by appealling to the mass market he ends up annoying some of the more pretentious among us, no offense meant . Of course that is why he is so effective.

And that his chosen way of achieving these goals is by promoting methods that disagree with the liberal consensus.

Actually I am not really sure he offends anyone, excpet those that actually care what he thinks. In order to be offended one has to at lesat care a little. Personally I think that restricts it to those that either really really like him or hate him. For the rest of us it's just one more example of his ego. Limbaugh long ago lost track with common people in this country, if he ever really had it to begin with. Sure he has a following of those that think like him, hell so does Michael Savage, G Gordon Liddy, and to a certain extent even Al Franken. I wouldn't exactly say any of them speak for or understand the majority of Americans however, nor should any of them get a Nobel Prize for saying things they think will make their shows more popular and thereby increase revenues to them. This was a publicity stunt, and while I expect people like Todd not to understand that, I do expect intelligent people to understand the difference between a real nomination and a publicity stunt. That said Gore's nomination is also a publicity stunt to promote the issues he is promoting now. He did nothing to warrant a Peace Prize nomination any more than Limbaugh.