Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-19-2007, 04:32 PM | #1 |
|
The recent white house reversal of it's wiretapping behavior raises some interesting questions. The first question is:
if warrantless wiretaps are necessary for our national defense why is w now getting warrants? The national Review had a scathing comment on this aspect. For the Bush administration to argue for years that this program, as operated, was critical to our national security and fell within the president's Constitutional authority, to then turnaround and surrender presidential authority this way is disgraceful. The administration is repudiating all the arguments it has made in testimony, legal briefs, and public statements. This goes to the heart of the White House's credibility. Of course this also takes a little of the wind from the sails of congressional intel committee investigations into the matter since w is no longer breaking the law. The committees will continue to investigate but now republicans can claim they are beating a dead horse for purely political reasons. |
|
01-19-2007, 04:44 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
01-19-2007, 04:50 PM | #3 |
|
Well, one of the defining characteristics of Dubya's presidency has been stubborn defiance long past the point of wisdom, followed by complete reversals.
Consider: - Starting a homeland security department - The nomination of Harriet Miers - The "resignation" of Donald Rumsfeld - The 9/11 commission - The CIA leak and pursuit of it It seems to just be how he rolls. |
|
01-19-2007, 08:05 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
01-19-2007, 09:23 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
01-19-2007, 10:28 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|