Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-16-2007, 11:50 AM | #1 |
|
By Greg Moran
STAFF WRITER January 13, 2007 -The ruling was not unexpected because of the events after the May 3 ruling in which Judge Gordon Thompson Jr. moved to enforce an order he initially made in 1991. He told the city to move the cross because it violated the state constitution's ban on government aid and preference for religion. Source: Mount Soledad cross case appeal by city dismissed | The San Diego Union-Tribune Commentary: After decades of atheist and A.C.L.U. efforts and millions of there dollars, case dismissed. The anti-Christian who brought the suit is dead and the suit against San Diego doesn’t apply because they don’t own the land. The guy should have bought a jet ski instead. He wasted his whole meaningless miserable life. (More so then other moonbats.) |
|
01-16-2007, 12:06 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
01-16-2007, 12:19 PM | #3 |
|
Unfortunately, it was an appeal by the city of San Diego that was dismissed.
A federal appeals court dismissed the city of San Diego's appeal yesterday of a now-irrelevant $5,000 per day fine imposed by a federal judge in May in the legal fight over the Mount Soledad cross. In a brief ruling, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the city's appeal was moot because it no longer controls the land that the La Jolla landmark sits atop. The battle over the cross continues. Two lawsuits challenging the land transfer are pending in federal court. Key hearings and a potential trial in those cases are now scheduled for July. Nuts. They're going to fight over the transfer of the land to the federal government last summer. IMO, they should just leave it alone. |
|
01-16-2007, 01:15 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
01-16-2007, 05:20 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 02:41 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 10:18 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 12:30 PM | #9 |
|
I think it's kinda' funny that a thread about a cross is put in the politics section. Conservatives always get pretty defensive when someone says they try to inject their religion into politics, yet, here ya' go.
As for the cross, this fight has been going on for some time and, while the cross will (rightfully) remain there for the foreseeable future, it will likely always be contested... |
|
01-17-2007, 03:50 PM | #10 |
|
I think it's kinda' funny that a thread about a cross is put in the politics section. Conservatives always get pretty defensive when someone says they try to inject their religion into politics, yet, here ya' go. Whats to defend. Israel is Jewish, the middle east is Islamic and America is Christian. You guys are the odd balls… As for the cross, this fight has been going on for some time and, while the cross will (rightfully) remain there for the foreseeable future, it will likely always be contested... In the foreseeable future I can see it torn down in much the same manner the statues of Saddam were pulled down… |
|
01-17-2007, 04:08 PM | #11 |
|
It’s the avenue chosen by anti-Christians erasing it from our culture and heritage. FEAR THE CROSS!!! . It's comming to get you! either that or it will just stay where it is like most gigantic inanimate objects (AKA Graven images) tend to do. |
|
01-17-2007, 04:24 PM | #12 |
|
It’s the avenue chosen by anti-Christians erasing it from our culture and heritage. What a tool. I'm not "anti" christian. I am, however, "anti-christians-who-are-assholes". There's a difference. Or, maybe, there isn't... |
|
01-17-2007, 04:30 PM | #13 |
|
Wow. What is the source of your antagonism towards Christians?? Is there a reason for your bigotry? |
|
01-17-2007, 04:40 PM | #14 |
|
Are you jealous of Xtians Steve? Are your parents Xtian Steve? Specifically, it's the self-righteous pricks who call themselves christians, and belittle and demean those who have opposing views, thereby conducting themselves in a manner which would be hard to describe as "christian". Does that clear it up a little more for you? |
|
01-17-2007, 05:05 PM | #16 |
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 05:49 PM | #17 |
|
By Greg Moran I will once again point out to you that many many christians in this country support enforcement of the establishment clause. My priest is one. |
|
01-17-2007, 06:21 PM | #18 |
|
|
|
01-17-2007, 06:48 PM | #19 |
|
Originally Posted by Hank Originally Posted by Steve Originally Posted by Hank Originally Posted by Steve Originally Posted by Hank Originally Posted by Steve I think it's kinda' funny that a thread about a cross is put in the politics section. You guys are the odd balls… As for the cross, this fight has been going on for some time and, while the cross will (rightfully) remain there for the foreseeable future, it will likely always be contested... In the foreseeable future I can see it torn down in much the same manner the statues of Saddam were pulled down… Wow. What a tool. I'm not "anti" christian. I am, however, "anti-Christians-who-are-assholes". There's a difference. Or, maybe, there isn't… Oh! Your one of those… (let me guess, you would have to read your own correspondence with the word Jew, Muslim or black substituted for the word Christian to see what we see.) |
|
01-17-2007, 07:15 PM | #20 |
|
It’s the avenue chosen by anti-Christians erasing it from our culture and heritage. I doubt that it has much to do with that. I'd say it's probably more of an attempt by leftists to fill their coffers and defame our troops at the same time. It's a win-win situation for them Wait until they see there prize.
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|