LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-13-2011, 06:23 PM   #1
Alexeric

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
476
Senior Member
Default Rick Perry Announces in SC
Perry announces presidential bid - CNN.com

Now we get to see how his record in Texas translates to the National scene. It was a pretty good speech all-in-all. I could hear a little whispery Reagan in there along with the Dubya accent.
Alexeric is offline


Old 08-13-2011, 07:17 PM   #2
ChexEcodece

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Another nail in Obamas political career
ChexEcodece is offline


Old 08-13-2011, 07:38 PM   #3
uaodnabnjz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
We have several threads going on this, seems the most conversation on it is here...

http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/poli...ield-weak.html
uaodnabnjz is offline


Old 08-13-2011, 10:09 PM   #4
IssuessBratte

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
I like his position on global warming. He calls it "one contrived phony mess". It would be good to have a POTUS with that attitude.
IssuessBratte is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 09:06 AM   #5
compiit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
I like his position on global warming. He calls it "one contrived phony mess". It would be good to have a POTUS with that attitude.
A president who either hates science or is downright ignorant would not be such a good thing.
compiit is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 02:35 PM   #6
textarchive

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
A president who either hates science or is downright ignorant would not be such a good thing.
Global warming isn't science, it's a fiction some have created to enrich themselves that the simpleminded have embraced.
textarchive is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 08:20 PM   #7
BenWired306

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Perry announces presidential bid - CNN.com

Now we get to see how his record in Texas translates to the National scene. It was a pretty good speech all-in-all. I could hear a little whispery Reagan in there along with the Dubya accent.
Don't be fooled by this democrat posing as a republican.

Perry worked for Gore's campaign in Texas in 1988, he has said we should consider sending our military in Mexico to help with that country's problems, and he issued an order for an inoculation for girls in the 6th grade in the state of Texas.

These are all signs to me that he's a democrat.

The fact that the MSM is expressing faux horror over him is nothing to me but the deliberate polishing of this leftist turd into a republican by the MSM as they generate news stories posturing him as an extremist in order to make him the choice for the RNC. Once he gets it, the people in power will win because no matter who wins (Obama or Perry), the people in power get their man in the WH.

Kramer
BenWired306 is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 08:35 PM   #8
ChexEcodece

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Two reasons to vote for perry one is that he isnt obama, the other is that he isnt Ron Paul. Still would rather have Michelle.
ChexEcodece is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 09:40 PM   #9
standaman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
870
Senior Member
Default
Two reasons to vote for perry one is thwt he isnt obama, the other is that he isnt Ron Paul. Still would rather have Michelle.
Same here, I was impressed with her taking Polently on in the debate and then going on to win the Straw Poll. Smart Lady, love her politics.
standaman is offline


Old 08-14-2011, 09:55 PM   #10
ChexEcodece

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Same here, I was impressed with her taking Polently on in the debate and then going on to win the Straw Poll. Smart Lady, love her politics.
The left hates her.
ChexEcodece is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 06:41 AM   #11
MasdMnPa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
Global warming isn't science, it's a fiction some have created to enrich themselves that the simpleminded have embraced.
No, the simple-minded believe it's all a hoax, since America is the only developed country in the world with that many idiots in it who don't take science into account, which is why like 40% of the public sides with conservative talking points.

Rick Perry is an idiot. His speech reminds you of Bush, and that brings back some pretty painful memories of unfunded mandates and unfunded wars and poorly-planned wars.

Enough with stupid rednecks heading a ticket; I dare Republicans to put up somebody smart.

Perry vs. Obama in a debate will look like Bartlett vs. that yokel in this debate clip from the West Wing a few years back. West Wing Presidential Debate - YouTube
MasdMnPa is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 01:48 PM   #12
ZXRamon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
Jason Marcel
No, the simple-minded believe it's all a hoax, since America is the only developed country in the world with that many idiots in it who don't take science into account, which is why like 40% of the public sides with conservative talking points. Or maybe it is the other idiots who don't understand the Scientific Method:

NASA Data Pit Scientific Method Against Climate Astrology

...The Scientific Method was in full display last week when the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing published the results of an important study conducted by Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite. With access to NASA satellite data measuring the amount of heat escaping the earth’s atmosphere into space, Spencer compared the NASA satellite data to the amount of heat loss predicted by computer models relied upon by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in support of IPCC’s assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis. Spencer found that the NASA satellite data reveal more heat is escaping into space than IPCC computer models have predicted.

Spencer’s discovery confirms prior heat-loss data reported by another set of NASA satellite instruments. Together, the NASA satellite instruments provide a 25-year record of real-world atmospheric conditions contradicting IPCC computer model predictions.

According to the Scientific Method, when real-world facts contradict a postulated hypothesis, the hypothesis fails. In this case, the failure of IPCC computer models to accurately predict atmospheric heat loss provided strong evidence that the IPCC computer models are based on faulty assumptions.

Rather than celebrating the advancement of knowledge provided by the NASA data and Spencer’s study, government employee “scientists” with a dog in the global warming fight viciously attacked Spencer and chastised the media for reporting this important scientific discovery.

Gavin Schmidt, a vigorous champion of the IPCC computer models and a government employee at NASA’s Goddard Institute (in a different branch of NASA than Spencer), protested the attention given to the NASA data by telling the press, “Climate sensitivity is not constrained by the last two decades of imperfect satellite data.”

This is a truly remarkable statement. Schmidt would have us believe that when 25 years of objective NASA satellite data contradict IPCC computer model predictions, we are supposed to ignore the real-world data and believe the discredited computer models instead. What are we supposed to do, pretend that the laws of physics have gone on a 25-year vacation?

Schmidt’s comments to the press are illustrative of a person whose taxpayer-funded paycheck is dependent upon the continuation of a failed global warming hypothesis. So long as the federal government operates under the assumption that we must study and address dangerous global warming, Schmidt’s job is secure. On the other hand, when scientists like Dr. Spencer report objective facts that falsify key components of global warming predictions, Schmidt’s government-provided paycheck is jeopardized and Schmidt lashes out.

Schmidt’s attempted denial of the NASA satellite facts is merely another example of global warming activists promoting faith-based principles and circular logic in contradiction of the Scientific Method. When it rains a lot, we are told this proves humans are creating a global warming crisis. When it doesn’t rain a lot, we are told this, too, proves humans are creating a global warming crisis. When temperatures are hot, we are told this proves humans are creating a global warming crisis. When temperatures are cold, we are told this, too, proves humans are creating a global warming crisis. In short, global warming activists have presented a theory for which they identify no set of facts or circumstances that could possibly disprove their theory – not even 25 years of objective NASA satellite data that directly contradict what their computer models say should be happening.

The faith-based circular logic of Schmidt and other global warming activists may be a lot of things, but it is not science.
Some have described it as religion, but that is doing a disservice to religion. Religion dictates that when a self-professed prophet’s predictions fail to come true, that person is identified as a false prophet.

A more accurate description of the factual denial practiced by Schmidt regarding the NASA satellite data is Climate Astrology. Astrologers, after all, make all sorts of vague predictions such that anything that later occurs can be alleged to have been predicted in advance. “This could be the moment to take a relationship one stage further” is to National Enquirer astrology what “the null hypothesis should be that all weather events are affected by global warming” is to Climate Astrology. Ironically, Kevin Trenberth, the same government employee “ scientist” who said “the null hypothesis should be that all weather events are affected by global warming” is the same government employee who lashed out against the Spencer-reported NASA satellite data by telling the press, “I cannot believe it got published.” Jason Marcel
Rick Perry is an idiot. Gee, a Republican that liberals think is an idiot. Let's give the scientific method a try. My hypothesis is that liberals are so stupid that people they think are "idiots" are actually far more cunning than the stupid liberals with their myopic view of reality to see, and therefor tend to hand them their hats at the polls (Reagan and Bush were both BIG idiots according to the left).

That puts Perry in a very good position to send Barack back to the unrepentent left-wing terrorist party circuit in IL come January 2013.


Jason Marcel
His speech reminds you of Bush, and that brings back some pretty painful memories of unfunded mandates and unfunded wars and poorly-planned wars. Gee, unfunded wars, like WWI, WWII, The Revolutionary War! Yeah, unfunded wars are just unheard of before Bush!

As for poorly planned, I will agree that the surge in Iraq (which B.O. and the entire left-wing establishment opposed) should have been done much sooner. The success of the surge evident by the fact that B.O. (who opposed it), has tried to replicate it in Afghanistan

Jason Marcel
Perry vs. Obama in a debate will look like Bartlett vs. that yokel in this debate clip from the West Wing a few years back. West Wing Presidential Debate - YouTube What does it say that you had to refer to a fictional debate from a fictional program about a fictional liberal president written by a liberal writer to show an example of what a debate between a stupid republican and a brilliant democrat would look like, rather than, oh, I don't know, an ACTUAL debate in the real world presidential debate between a supposedly stupid republican and brilliant democrat.

It is no mystery that the two most respected and succesful democratic presidens are Jeb Bartlett and Andy Sheppard, because they were both self-masterbatory left-wing fantasy presidencies! (although I will admit to enjoying both The American President and West Wing as entertainment)
ZXRamon is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 01:57 PM   #13
ElenaEvgeevnaa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
Folks, the topic is Rick Perry and his announcement, not global warming.

Unless the post is pertinent to Rick Perry's position on global warming, any further off-topic posts will be deleted.

Thanks.
ElenaEvgeevnaa is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 02:16 PM   #14
Vemnagelignc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Now the race can truly begin.
Vemnagelignc is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 02:28 PM   #15
standaman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
870
Senior Member
Default
Perry vs. Obama in a debate will look like Bartlett vs. that yokel in this debate clip from the West Wing a few years back. West Wing Presidential Debate - YouTube
That is an interesting comment, Obama is now eating his own flesh, approval rating below 40%.

"New data posted Sunday shows that 39% of Americans approve of Obama's job performance, while 54% disapprove. Both are the worst numbers of his presidency."

Gallup: Obama job rating sinks below 40% for first time - latimes.com
standaman is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 02:35 PM   #16
gardenerextraordinaire

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
709
Senior Member
Default
Two reasons to vote for perry one is that he isnt obama, the other is that he isnt Ron Paul. Still would rather have Michelle.
Please nominate Bachman.

As for Perry I think he resembles W too much. People don't want another Texas cowboy no matter what his policies are.
gardenerextraordinaire is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 02:38 PM   #17
Q0KmoR8K

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
A few weeks ago Danny, i said when Perry gets in, the entire political sphere will turn on its head...and why? For no other reason, than the fact he is the Governor of Texas - and when the Governor of Texas runs for President, the entire country (not to mention the entire world) takes notice. So look at what happened...he got in, and already he is seen as the favorite to now be the nominee. There was one thing that could stop Bachmann, this was it.
Q0KmoR8K is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 02:58 PM   #18
Vemnagelignc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Please nominate Bachman.

As for Perry I think he resembles W too much. People don't want another Texas cowboy no matter what his policies are.
When do we get to use the Chicago professor stereotype?
Vemnagelignc is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 03:35 PM   #19
Alexeric

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
476
Senior Member
Default
My retired college professor uncle calls the President a "Chicago street n***er"- would that work for you?
Alexeric is offline


Old 08-15-2011, 03:41 PM   #20
Vemnagelignc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
My retired college professor uncle calls the President a "Chicago street n***er"- would that work for you?
I have no need bring race into it.
Vemnagelignc is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity