Reply to Thread New Thread |
02-08-2011, 04:00 AM | #22 |
|
Stiglitz is right about where the last $4 trillion in debt came from. What he doesn't tell you is where the next $10 trillion comes from: Medicare and Medicaid. 80% of spending growth from her on is Medicare and Medicaid. Most of the rest is Social Security. Don't be blaming Democrats for the actions of Republicans. |
|
06-29-2011, 06:12 PM | #24 |
|
Can't say I didn't see this one coming.
Obama Pushes Tax Hikes in Budget Talks, Calls Aug. 2 'Hard Deadline' on Debt Ceiling Thoughts |
|
06-29-2011, 06:14 PM | #25 |
|
|
|
06-29-2011, 06:20 PM | #26 |
|
Can't say I didn't see this one coming. |
|
06-29-2011, 10:38 PM | #27 |
|
While this is classic posturing and in no way a surprise for a Democratic White House, it is strange behavior for a president on the ropes. It also flies in the face of the candidate Obama who was so clear about how he would work "with" congress and not against it. Of course then he had George Bush to blame for everything.
Now though, it is just plain stupid. You do not talk tough unless you are coming from a position of strength. And he isn't. Considering the collection of oddballs and wackos arrayed against him, his numbers suck But then there is this: Nerves Show on Team Obama Recent scrambling by the president’s political advisers indicates they’re very worried about his reelection chances. By Josh Kraushaar From the National Journal: It’s been a rough June for the White House. Instead of being able to run a campaign taking credit for economic improvement, President Obama will, according to the latest forecasts, be trying to win four more years amid a grim economy next year. The president’s reelection team, once hoping to run on a “Morning in America” theme now doesn’t have that luxury. No wonder, the president’s advisers over the past month have been making moves that suggest they’re awfully concerned about his prospects: 1. Searching for an economic message. Veteran Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg recently offered perceptive advice to the president’s team by criticizing its “getting the car out of the ditch” metaphor meant to suggest the economy is slowly improving. As Greenberg wrote: “People thought they still were in the ditch.” This is a time when the president needs to find his inner Bill Clinton, and feel Americans’ pain. If he wants to be one of the few presidents to win reelection in a stagnant economy, he’ll have to devote less time to defending past policies, like the auto bailout, and more to offering specific solutions to help people get back to work. Think a 21st century version of FDR’s fireside chats. But there are few signs that the president’s economic messaging has changed. Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz recently said Democrats own the economy, but they don’t seem to be adapting their message to the bad economy likely to face them in November 2012. 2. Doubling down on manufacturing. The latest White House effort to wring good news out of a bad economy focuses on successes in the manufacturing sector: the auto bailout that put GM and Chrysler on sounder footing, as well as green initiatives. Politically, it’s a puzzling message. While there has been a small uptick in manufacturing jobs, it’s hardly enough to be felt by the blue-collar electorate, who have been bearing the brunt of the recession and never viewed Obama too favorably in the first place. The latest Gallup weekly tracking poll shows Obama’s approval with college graduates at 51 percent, with a 40 percent approval among nongraduates. The president’s emphasis on green jobs doesn’t help. It’s tough for many steelworkers to see themselves producing solar panels. Clean-energy jobs may be the future, but they’re not seen by displaced workers as a panacea. NationalJournal.com - Nerves Show on Team Obama - Wednesday, June 29, 2011 Considering the National Journal is an inside-the-beltway publication, it reads like a warning. |
|
06-29-2011, 10:39 PM | #28 |
|
It's a tough nut to crack. The addict always bargains this way. You always get the "just give me a little bit" routine and if you're stupid enough to cave it takes that addict about 2 seconds to be back at the bottle or the cigarettes or the credit cards. We're not trying to wean a baby off the teat here. We're trying to get a drunk off the juice and it's absolutely never a pretty operation. Obama stopped being president and became a candidate two months ago..... |
|
06-29-2011, 10:44 PM | #29 |
|
""You need to be here. I've been here," he said of Congress. "You stay here, let's get it done."
Read more: Obama Pushes Tax Hikes in Budget Talks, Calls Aug. 2 'Hard Deadline' on Debt Ceiling - FoxNews.com Now that is outright bullshit. He's been traveling more than any other president and when he is in Washington he's golfing. |
|
06-29-2011, 10:55 PM | #30 |
|
""You need to be here. I've been here," he said of Congress. "You stay here, let's get it done." |
|
06-29-2011, 10:56 PM | #31 |
|
Can't say I didn't see this one coming. There are 18,000 baby-boomers entering social security/medicare DAILY which will continue for the next 15 years--resulting in another 64 trillion in unfunded liabilities on top of the 14.3 trillion in red ink now. This results in $534,000.00 per household owed to the Federal government to pay this tab. Attachment 11372 1 billion dollars --$100.00 bills stacked on pallets. Attachment 11373 1 trillion dollars--$100.00 bill stacked on pallets. And we only need 78.3 trillion--or 78 of the above 1 trillion chart- |
|
06-30-2011, 03:27 PM | #32 |
|
Is there anyone out there who really believes that cutting your way to prosperity will work or that the Republican position of protecting tax cuts for corporate jet owners over sending your kids to school is the correct one, let alone sustainable? Can someone please lay out an argument how that insanity can possibly make sense even to a tea party person?
The GOP is trying to tank the economy to make Obama look bad. 1) That's astounding 2) It will backfire on them. I can't wait to see them running for the hills when the DOW starts dropping. |
|
06-30-2011, 04:18 PM | #33 |
|
Is there anyone out there who really believes that cutting your way to prosperity will work or that the Republican position of protecting tax cuts for corporate jet owners over sending your kids to school is the correct one, let alone sustainable? Can someone please lay out an argument how that insanity can possibly make sense even to a tea party person? You sound as insane as those who thought democrats caused the housing crisis to make bush look bad... |
|
06-30-2011, 05:00 PM | #34 |
|
Of course taxes are going to increase. Everybody knows this. The cuts in spending necessary to balance the budget without raising taxes are simply unacceptable to the electorate. Even the TEA Party types oppose cuts in Medicare and Social security.
What is happening now is that cynical politicians are manouvering for tactical advantage while the US economy is perched on the edge of disastrous government crisis, even default. The Baggies have become the suicide bombers of American politics. If they manage to bring down the government as they have been chanting so enthusiastically for the past couple of years, the result will be a snap back of public opinion that will bring us to the level of socialism in Canada, if not in Germany. Go for it, fellas, the Marxist Libertarian Party is with you all the way. |
|
06-30-2011, 05:11 PM | #35 |
|
|
|
06-30-2011, 05:37 PM | #36 |
|
...while the US economy is perched on the edge of disastrous government crisis, even default... Did you just arrive in the United States or wake up from a decade-long nap? Here's what will happen, and pay careful attention because when you see it this once you'll be able to make a comment similar to the one I'm making now the next time some partisan tool starts commenting on whatever "disastrous government crisis" is about to befall us next:
In summation, move along folks, nothing to see here, or at least nothing we haven't seem many, many times before. |
|
07-01-2011, 01:22 AM | #37 |
|
The tax hikes are insignificant. Even if Republicans agree to them, they got 90% of what they wanted. I predict that the Republicans will take this deal. But being that it's only the end of JUne and they have until Aug. 5, sure, they are going to pretend to walk away for now.
Besides, most of these tax breaks are crap. Republicans should be happy to let them go, and I suspect they actually are. But if they can get more out of the Democrats, why not? |
|
07-01-2011, 01:48 AM | #38 |
|
Is there anyone out there who really believes that cutting your way to prosperity will work or that the Republican position of protecting tax cuts for corporate jet owners over sending your kids to school is the correct one, let alone sustainable? Can someone please lay out an argument how that insanity can possibly make sense even to a tea party person? BTW, by his third year in office, Ronald Reagan was riding one of the greatest economic resurgences in US history, one that lasted well into Clinton's term. Any idea how he did that? I seem to remember hearing the word "cut" as in spending and as in tax rates. Please provide one example in the last one hundred years of any government anywhere of taxing its way back to prosperity. Just one. One as in half of two. |
|
07-01-2011, 06:39 AM | #40 |
|
Congress needs to be firm and demand huge cuts in spending. Lets start with congressional staff and executive staff. It is time for the elite to downsize. We also need to stop subsidizes.....All of them. We also need to stop the Obama cronyism with GE and the unions. We also need to stop spending money on bullshit green jobs. They are killing Spain why would they work here? We need to stop all federal spending that is not in the defense of the country. Let the states individually deal with welfare problems and education. Maybe that was we wont have a generation of fucking morons on food stamps.
In other words.....Stop being fucking selfish! You are not entitled to anything you fat lazy bastards! |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|