LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-08-2011, 07:30 AM   #1
wmhardware

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default Hacked Fox tweets claim 'Obama dead'
Hacked Fox tweets claim 'Obama dead'
Hacked Fox tweets claim 'Obama dead' - Americas - Al Jazeera English
A FoxNews.com Twitter account was hacked briefly on Monday and six false tweets, saying that US President Barack Obama had been shot dead, were sent.

In a statement posted on its website later on Monday morning, Fox News called the tweets "malicious" and "false".

The media outlet, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, said it was investigating the hacking and had alerted the US Secret Service. Fox may need to have a chat with their IT director.

I'd love to see the reaction of people who bought this.
wmhardware is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 08:26 AM   #2
investor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Hacked Fox tweets claim 'Obama dead'
Hacked Fox tweets claim 'Obama dead' - Americas - Al Jazeera English

Fox may need to have a chat with their IT director.

I'd love to see the reaction of people who bought this.
It is more likely that Fox will soon announce that the culprit is a Jon Stewart staffer.
investor is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 08:50 AM   #3
gusecrync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Then a picture of Rupert Murdoch's junk was sent to Katie Couric
gusecrync is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 05:15 PM   #4
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
It is more likely that Fox will soon announce that the culprit is a Jon Stewart staffer.
The secret service is investigating. They'll say who the culprit was.
bitymnmictada is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 05:41 PM   #5
MinisuipGaicai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Yeah the USSS will get to the bottom of this real fast, whoever is responsible will almost certainly be facing quite a long time in the big house.
MinisuipGaicai is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 05:58 PM   #6
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
Yeah the USSS will get to the bottom of this real fast, whoever is responsible will almost certainly be facing quite a long time in the big house.
They could just get slapped on the wrist.
bitymnmictada is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:13 PM   #7
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Yeah the USSS will get to the bottom of this real fast, whoever is responsible will almost certainly be facing quite a long time in the big house.
I imagine, once it's shown that their only intention was to mess with Fox, they'll just get some kind of fine or something. I don't know what the legal ramifications are for hacking an account that doesn't involve secrets or someone's financial security.
Licacivelip is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:19 PM   #8
repldoinfo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
569
Senior Member
Default
Yeah the USSS will get to the bottom of this real fast, whoever is responsible will almost certainly be facing quite a long time in the big house.
I don't know about that. Don't a lot of hackers pride themselves in being able to cover their tracks and remain anonymous?
repldoinfo is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:22 PM   #9
Kryfamid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
575
Senior Member
Default
Funny topic on a forum where 95% of the membership refers to usama bin laden as Osama. Just sayin'
Kryfamid is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:22 PM   #10
OWV9LSxH

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
I don't know about that. Don't a lot of hackers pride themselves in being able to cover their tracks and remain anonymous?
That's the thing, it seems that hackers have a bit of a leg up on law enforcement, with far more of them getting away with the crime than getting caught. Sure, you'll see headlines about hackers getting busted here and there, but they're such a tiny portion of the folks doing these things that it doesn't make much difference. It's just for show.

Heck, Lulzsec formed, attacked a bunch of sites for a few months, then got bored and disbanded. Doesn't exactly put confidence in law enforcement's ability to fight these guys.
OWV9LSxH is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:25 PM   #11
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
I imagine, once it's shown that their only intention was to mess with Fox, they'll just get some kind of fine or something. I don't know what the legal ramifications are for hacking an account that doesn't involve secrets or someone's financial security.
Talking about the president being dead and spreading false information in regards to national security may be considered more then the intention to mess with Fox.
bitymnmictada is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:26 PM   #12
MinisuipGaicai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Yeah and that's where they're gonna get stung, not to mention the time and resources of the USSS and Court costs they'll have to cover plus the fine and loss of services in VOS of whomever is their service provider. The Service provider will likely get in trouble as well if they were determined to be complicit in nature.
MinisuipGaicai is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:26 PM   #13
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
I'd imagine the reason most hackers never get caught is that there are a lot of them and they mostly just cause some irritation so there's not that much of a force pursuing them.
Licacivelip is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:31 PM   #14
MinisuipGaicai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Well, the charges could potentially carry 25 years in prison just at the Federal level alone, so most of them tend not to do it within the US, and that's not inclusive of any mail/wire fraud or state charges etc. Likely they wouldnt get stung with the lot, but i'm pretty sure we'll see an example made out of whoever was responsible for this.
MinisuipGaicai is offline


Old 05-07-2011, 06:54 PM   #15
Talicoabilk

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
I imagine, once it's shown that their only intention was to mess with Fox, they'll just get some kind of fine or something. I don't know what the legal ramifications are for hacking an account that doesn't involve secrets or someone's financial security.
If, and its a big if, the hacker[s] can be identified and are within US jurisdiction they could be facing very serious federal charges. I would bet they would try to make a case of conspiracy.

But don't hold your breath on them being identified.
Talicoabilk is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity