LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-23-2011, 03:12 PM   #1
erepsysoulperj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default Oil and gasoline prices falling today due to SPR decision
As I type this morning, crude is down 5.5% to $90.39/barrel and RBOB wholesale gasoline is at $2.81/gallon. A decision has been made to increase the supply of US oil on the market even as demand is down. Interesting political calculations at work here.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Being Tapped To Offset Lost Crude : The Two-Way : NPR
erepsysoulperj is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 03:17 PM   #2
P3bWjm1j

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Which means they'll just go back up when this is done and it'll be the same old crap all over again.

Just bomb the crap out of those people and be done with it. The situation will not be resolved with diplomacy.

And we might as well do this anyway because all they'll say about America is the usual crap about America going to war over oil and empire building and all that razzamatazz.

Damned if we do and damned if we don't.
P3bWjm1j is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 03:42 PM   #3
feannigvogten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Just imagine how the price would plummet if we where actually allowed to drill for oil.
feannigvogten is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 03:56 PM   #4
P3bWjm1j

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Yes because cheap gas prices and money is far more important than a clean environment. Who cares if some species go extinct when there's an oil spill like the Gulf one, right? We've just got to go! Go go go go go go go go GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! AND WE NEED THAT GAS TO GO REALLY FAST!
P3bWjm1j is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:00 PM   #5
erepsysoulperj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
I really wasn't in favor of this 30 day "event" but what it does show is that spanking the speculators works. The chairman of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said a couple of weeks ago that 88% of the "long" crude contracts (bets that oil prices will go up) were owned by non-producers or consumers of oil. These are big banks and hedge funds with big bucks, who day-trade and profit on price swings. They're changing their bets today, and you can see the results.

A more permanent strategy would be imposing position limits and transparency requirements on this niche market.
erepsysoulperj is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:03 PM   #6
feannigvogten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Yes because cheap gas prices and money is far more important than a clean environment. Who cares if some species go extinct when there's an oil spill like the Gulf one, right? We've just got to go! Go go go go go go go go GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! AND WE NEED THAT GAS TO GO REALLY FAST!
If you have a hard time paying for gas now, your not going to be able to make the expensive jump to something new.
feannigvogten is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:11 PM   #7
CatLuvkaLover

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
As I type this morning, crude is down 5.5% to $90.39/barrel and RBOB wholesale gasoline is at $2.81/gallon. A decision has been made to increase the supply of US oil on the market even as demand is down. Interesting political calculations at work here.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Being Tapped To Offset Lost Crude : The Two-Way : NPR
What is interesting is the timing of all this. The release is being done as oil prices (for the July, August, September, and even further out contracts) were already on a somewhat decline and inline with several reports on inventory showing similar price influences on the price before this "release" decision. This was not done when oil was well over $100/barrel and we all knew then about potential effects on economic recovery. Also, this decision showed up the very next day after Bernanke spoke warning about the economic recovery slow down, with plenty of evidence supporting. What will be interesting to see is the effect on prices for further out speculation. Or, those contract months outside of the effect of this release, rather outside of the intended effects assuming more is not release further down the road. Which trust me, Oil is price range speculated that far out. September contracts are already moved as well. I cannot begin to explain to everyone the short positions (expecting even further oil value declines) I am seeing people put on the market for the next several months contracts this morning.
CatLuvkaLover is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:14 PM   #8
RerRibreLok

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
666
Senior Member
Default
I'm all for using every other country's oil before we begin to drain our own national resource.
RerRibreLok is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:22 PM   #9
Almolfuncomma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
590
Senior Member
Default
I'm all for using every other country's oil before we begin to drain our own national resource.
All you liberals think that way, liberals don't care about American jobs. You would rather send 500+ billion a yr and all the jobs that go with it to oil lords and put our economy in their hands dictating to us.
Almolfuncomma is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:31 PM   #10
RerRibreLok

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
666
Senior Member
Default
All you liberals think that way, liberals don't care about American jobs. You would rather send 500+ billion a yr and all the jobs that go with it to oil lords and put our economy in their hands dictating to us.
Ok, lets assume we drill-baby-drill and deplete all of our own oil in 30 years. In 30 years we will have to seek oil from places like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Libya, who will literally have us bent over a barrel, because they KNOW we have to get our oil from them.

Right now, we do have alternative sources of oil, so those countries can't bargain too hard or they will lose a huge customer. Gasoline is still roughly as expensive as a gallon of milk, its not like prices are unbearable. In 30 years, if we do it wrong now, prices will be unbearable. Is planning for the future an anathema to the conservative mind?
RerRibreLok is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 04:33 PM   #11
erepsysoulperj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
Just imagine how the price would plummet if we where actually allowed to drill for oil.
I'd agree that doing more to encourage additional exploration and drilling would be great for jobs, and maybe eventually for the price. What really could change things would be making NG the alternative transportation fuel in the US. Set a goal of having half of our vehicles run on NG rather than gasoline. Now that would eliminate all need for imported oil in a relatively short time.
erepsysoulperj is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 06:23 PM   #12
bitymnmictada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
479
Senior Member
Default
As I type this morning, crude is down 5.5% to $90.39/barrel and RBOB wholesale gasoline is at $2.81/gallon. A decision has been made to increase the supply of US oil on the market even as demand is down. Interesting political calculations at work here.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve Being Tapped To Offset Lost Crude : The Two-Way : NPR
What, increasing supply lowers price? Who'd have thought? Of course good luck getting this to last long enough to really matter by election time.
bitymnmictada is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 06:39 PM   #13
Bondjrno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
...... I cannot begin to explain to everyone the short positions (expecting even further oil value declines) I am seeing people put on the market for the next several months contracts this morning.
This is a perfect opportunity for a short squeeze, a highly inelastic commodity bid way up, put some downward pressure on the market, get a big block of shorts, and with any luck you could send oil limit down for a week.
Bondjrno is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 06:40 PM   #14
investor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Which means they'll just go back up when this is done and it'll be the same old crap all over again.

Just bomb the crap out of those people and be done with it. The situation will not be resolved with diplomacy.

And we might as well do this anyway because all they'll say about America is the usual crap about America going to war over oil and empire building and all that razzamatazz.

Damned if we do and damned if we don't.
When did we ever "don't"? I know we are "Damned if we do" but we have never tried the "don't" so how would we know?
investor is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 06:56 PM   #15
CatLuvkaLover

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
This is a perfect opportunity for a short squeeze, a highly inelastic commodity bid way up, put some downward pressure on the market, get a big block of shorts, and with any luck you could send oil limit down for a week.
Well, we sure have the perfect set up. If I was selling a position now at $91.40 per for WTI or $107.75 for Brent only to later fulfill the position later with a buy in the mid-low $80s for WTI or mid-low 90s for Brent then we are there. Perhaps watch it fall further. Since oil prices were headed down anyway, before this decision, that is exactly what is being set up today. Some may argue that in a way this may be looked at as a form of QE3, with Fed support (timing of his conversation sending prices down with the decision sending it down further), and with plenty of cash to be made along the ride. Why not short squeeze oil for at least August and September contracts? Or at least leave the option set up in a short position against another position dealing with even more stupidity coming from IEA down the road?
CatLuvkaLover is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 07:05 PM   #16
ancexttew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Yes because cheap gas prices and money is far more important than a clean environment. Who cares if some species go extinct when there's an oil spill like the Gulf one, right? We've just got to go! Go go go go go go go go GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! AND WE NEED THAT GAS TO GO REALLY FAST!
Actually yes it is more important.

In case you have missed it, the human race is at the top of the food chain and we cant do shit to harm the planet. Also, in case you've missed it, when people aren't getting the resources they need, they tend to kill each other to get them.


BTW - 99% of all species on the planet had gone extinct long before man walked the earth. Its part of the natural cycle of adapt or die.
ancexttew is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 07:09 PM   #17
Bondjrno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
Well, we sure have the perfect set up. If I was selling a position now at $91.40 per for WTI or $107.75 for Brent only to later fulfill the position later with a buy in the mid-low $80s for WTI or mid-low 90s for Brent then we are there. Perhaps watch it fall further. Since oil prices were headed down anyway, before this decision, that is exactly what is being set up today. Some may argue that in a way this may be looked at as a form of QE3, with Fed support (timing of his conversation sending prices down with the decision sending it down further), and with plenty of cash to be made along the ride. Why not short squeeze oil for at least August and September contracts? Or at least leave the option set up in a short position against another position dealing with even more stupidity coming from IEA down the road?
And if you take it down fast enough, enough of the long side speculators will be sitting out the market (being stuck in a position that's moving limit down for a couple of days tends to reduce your stake), that you could see prices stay relatively low for a while. With a commodity as inelastic as petroleum, $50/barrel makes as much sense as $125/barrel.
Bondjrno is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 07:16 PM   #18
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Yes because cheap gas prices and money is far more important than a clean environment. Who cares if some species go extinct when there's an oil spill like the Gulf one, right? We've just got to go! Go go go go go go go go GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! AND WE NEED THAT GAS TO GO REALLY FAST!
What species became extinct because of the Gulf spill?

Those who don't want us using our own resources are those who are far to comfortable with us being dependent on other countries. They don't want the United States to be truly independent.

We should drill for oil here. When (and it will be a case of "when" as opposed to "if") we find it, our bargaining power becomes far more strong with governments of oil producing countries. We can then say "Lower your prices, or we'll just get our own, and you know we have it".

We could fortify our bargaining position and, at the same time, get lower prices on oil. Sadly, though, libs don't want to see either...
eskimosik is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 07:38 PM   #19
Bondjrno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
What species became extinct because of the Gulf spill?

Those who don't want us using our own resources are those who are far to comfortable with us being dependent on other countries. They don't want the United States to be truly independent.

We should drill for oil here. When (and it will be a case of "when" as opposed to "if") we find it, our bargaining power becomes far more strong with governments of oil producing countries. We can then say "Lower your prices, or we'll just get our own, and you know we have it".

We could fortify our bargaining position and, at the same time, get lower prices on oil. Sadly, though, libs don't want to see either...
There isn't enough oil here to make much of a difference, we just had a huge discovery talked about in these forums, there was enough oil to last us a couple of weeks, that's a huge amount of oil, but we burn a lot of oil.
Now if we reduce our use of oil, down to what we actually produce, we are independent, if we had kept the energy independence programs that Carter put in place, we would be using significantly less oil, and we would be producing energy efficient products that would be in demand.
But we didn't do that.

The only way to make a dent in our dependence is to use less.
Which is a lot easier than producing more.
Bondjrno is offline


Old 06-23-2011, 07:48 PM   #20
eskimosik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Blahblahblah.

You don't want us drilling. I get that. You want us to be dependent on foreign oil. I get that, too.

Reducing our oil consumption to what we produce is a fucking pipe dream, and it'll never happen. Ever.

But, hey, if we could do it in 30 years, why not use our own oil now while we're getting to that point?
eskimosik is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity