Reply to Thread New Thread |
03-23-2011, 05:17 PM | #21 |
|
That's assuming the Dems only wanted to spend as much this year as they did last year; a pretty faulty assumption IMO. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:18 PM | #22 |
|
Well they wouldn't be a good solution, but if you look at from 2008 to 2010, where Democrats did control everything, ANYTHING would be better. wouldn't it be fair to say that the Democrats controlled both houses 'o congress and the white house durin' the peak 'o the recession, just as the mighty waves 'o fiscal catastrophe smashed into the hull 'o our nation? 'twas all they could do to ride out the storm, make sure wall street was stabilized, and the rich remained protected from the worst 'o the weather. taxes remained low....the President authorized further tax cuts through the stimulus, i mean, wouldn't that be at least a more honest view 'o the time the left controlled the levers 'o power, matey? 'tis a miracle that unemployment didn't reach 25%. - MeadHallPirate |
|
03-23-2011, 05:18 PM | #23 |
|
Fine, give them the Senate and the White House so they actually do control things, then you get to complain it's their fault. Of course, they made their owners, the super rich, a lot of money taken from the lower and middle clase. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:19 PM | #24 |
|
Is the one the GOP has better than what the Democrats have? |
|
03-23-2011, 05:22 PM | #25 |
|
Extended the Bush tax cuts, allowed busienss owners to not worry about the over regulation that was about to happen with Obama case... When President Obama had to forgo much of the ACA, so that the GOP, led by a ring in it's nose by the upper 2%, kept everyone from passing through 'secret holds' and filibusters. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:24 PM | #26 |
|
Well they wouldn't be a good solution, but if you look at from 2008 to 2010, where Democrats did control everything, ANYTHING would be better. President Obama and the Dems did quite a good job in saving and then creating jobs and keeping the recession from being worse and to start turning it around. Even though the GOP slowed it down as much as possible with a record number of Senate filibusters and secret holds. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:43 PM | #27 |
|
Yep, when the GOP held lower and middle Americans hostage, so that President Obama had to agree to letting the tax breaks for the super rich continue. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:47 PM | #28 |
|
All of you republicans are so jaded. Do you actually think these people give a rat's ass about you or the average working American? They don't. They care about one thing, gaining total control over the legislature. They will say whatever they have to. Play into your hate and intolerance by pushing petty social issues that have no impact whatsoever on our society as a whole. All in the name of gaining power.
The Democrats are no better really. Part of me thinks many of them are republicans who infiltrated the party to make sure they never get anything worthwhile done. At the end of the day even the democrats along with their President are really in this for themselves and the rewards that come with gaming the system for their masters in the business world looking to corner the market on world energy and usher in an era of Corporate Oligarchy where will have have no rights. More and more I feel like this. As much as I want to believe in the left, I do not think they will ever come through and the right are nothing more than greedy warmongers looking to profit off the suffering of others and they do well because they play right into prejudices and do a great job of driving wedges between the American people. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:49 PM | #29 |
|
hail 9aces, 'tis a miracle that unemployment didn't reach 25%. Yes I know you think Obama is the Anointed One, as he promised unemployment would not exceed 8%. He and you liberals think he is the miracle worker. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:57 PM | #30 |
|
I know I am the only one here who thinks any recovery for our workers is a pipe dream, given the current economic model the US has embraced. But, I just cannot ignore what common sense tells me. We not only have millions unemployed, but we have millions under employed. And we had those under employers folks in vast numbers prior to the crash of 08. I know many of those people here in my area personally. In all age groups, but especially in the over 50 age group.
While the offshoring has slowed a little, it is still alive and well, and leaving for China and other slave labor areas steadily, slowing bleeding the host that I call America's Workers to death. When you are bleeding jobs, this makes it difficult for any strong job growth into the future. So, when the unemployment numbers do get better, it will be a snail creep, instead of the manner we saw it BEFORE offshoring so much of America's industry. And this means over the next decade or so, we will have an increase in America's poor. And even a loss in middle class, with wage stagnation the status quo. And that is the only place our current model can lead. There is nothing wrong with fair trade. I believe in trade. I think it's the best thing since sliced bread. But we don't have anything close to fair trade when it comes to China, or any slave labor developing nation. Instead, we have a model that guts American industry, certain segments of it, and in the process displaces American jobs that some Americans cannot replace as they just are intellectually, average people. To say that some folks are not as smart as others, is not PC, but its the TRUTH. And American industry could and did use these people for decades. And there are a helluva more of those sorts of people than you would ever admit. I know scores of them just in my own area. These folks have been joining the poor ever since the Repub yielded to corporations and gave em tax breaks to relocate to China and Mexico and other diverse places. So, you want jobs? Don't look to the Repubs to help out, unless you want to employ some Chinese. And don't look to the Dems either for that matter. But I will say this, and it's a fact. There are still a few Dems who actually "get it" in regards to the destructiveness of corporate globalization, and while they recognize it will not go away, they do seek to hogtie that fucker, so that it doesn't destroy our working and middle class folks. You indulge in globalization, you just don't give away the whole damn store in the process. And you don't do actions that destroys our own People, the folks these dirty politicians are SUPPOSED to be representing, instead of selling the People out to special interests with deep pockets. You really want to get the gov't back working for the majority of the People? Public finance all elections for Congress and the Presidency. Making accepting contributions a jailable offense, because dirty money is ruling today. I heard yesterday with Pawlinty, that if he won the primary to challenge Obama, it would cost him 1 BILLION bucks to win! 1 BILLION dollars for god's sake. There will be not strings attached to those donations, but ROPES. How in the hell can you expect these jackwags to represent the American People? You can't. And it is obvious, this money and politics has created a beast, that feeds on not green grass but green currency. We gotta have real, and effective reforms in the election process. Give the media some tax breaks in exchange for them allowing equal time for each canidate, once a week 3 months prior to Nov of that election year. It't the public airwaves afterall! We own em. The People owns them. Allow each canidate a few million bucks financed by taxes, and limit these fuckers. And pay extra attention, using the brightest lawyers, to alleviate the inevitable loopholes that always find their way in previous campaign reforms. Only Draconian methods will put an end to this Oligarchy we have morphed into. Then we will have perhaps the first real representation of the American People in a long time, if ever. |
|
03-23-2011, 05:59 PM | #31 |
|
Yep, when America was reeling from the bad recession that started when the GOP had complete control of the federal government. |
|
03-23-2011, 06:12 PM | #32 |
|
Yep, when America was reeling from the bad recession that started when the GOP had complete control of the federal government. Might wanna look at this United States GDP Growth Rate and go from 2000 to present. Lots of things there, jobless rate, GDP, others. Sadly for you, the data seems to disagree with your stance. Good thing those pesky Republicans did slow things down a bit. |
|
03-23-2011, 06:13 PM | #33 |
|
Well for what Republican'ts are doing from coast to coast I can yell directly at THEM for. As it is they who are waging the war on the middle class, women, and children! This is all about a certain party getting and keeping power and position, and of course the personal ambitions of remaining a ruling elite. Royalty by any other name stinks as badly. This explains how the Repubs during Bush Jr. could be hardly distinquishable from Liberal Dems on spending. They just refused to tax the rich enough to pay for their spending. And of course even that, lowering taxes and increasing spending, could have been a move to insure Obama would have a helluva fiscal mess on this hands, which eventually he would be blamed for all of it, which would help the Repubs in 2010 and 2012. It's not like I can trust the Repubs NOT to pull something like this, as they are known for dirty pool and questionable tactics. That always comes with the territory when power and personal ambition corrupts. |
|
03-23-2011, 06:25 PM | #34 |
|
Lets be really fair and say the Senate and the House was controlled by the Dem's from January 2008, the recession started under Democrat control of both houses and have been in control for now over 4 yrs. A great start to another fiscal mess is to wage at least two more very costly wars, and again, do not fund it with higher tax rates especially on the rich fuckers. And don't even put it in the budget this next time either! When you stop funding your wars with tax increases, you are not only not fiscially irresponsible, you are the worlds village idiot. And village idiots don't need to be doing shit that affects me. It ain't never good and I generally lose. |
|
03-23-2011, 06:26 PM | #35 |
|
|
|
03-23-2011, 07:22 PM | #36 |
|
I know I am the only one here who thinks any recovery for our workers is a pipe dream, given the current economic model the US has embraced. But, I just cannot ignore what common sense tells me. We not only have millions unemployed, but we have millions under employed. And we had those under employers folks in vast numbers prior to the crash of 08. I know many of those people here in my area personally. In all age groups, but especially in the over 50 age group. One more thing the Democrats will not do is close our border, because again they don't care about jobs. Their fine outsourcing 20 million good American jobs right here at home, because they pander to the Mexican vote and throw the American worker under the bus. Democrats have never been about jobs. You want jobs close the border and bring our oil jobs back home. |
|
03-23-2011, 07:27 PM | #37 |
|
And of course it took from Jan 08 to Fall of 08 for the the ENTIRE REASON for the crash to occur! NOPE. It took damn near 8 years, under Bush and the Repubs for this shit to happen. The Dems were in control in Congress for 7 months before the crash came down. They are miracle workers, but even they could not FIX what your team created. And the mess was so huge that it will take another 8 years to fix their fuckups. If not longer. Yeah I know you liberals all hate the rich, and Obama started a third war that you failed to mention and he escalated the war in Afghanistan and did nothing to pay for any of it. |
|
03-23-2011, 07:34 PM | #38 |
|
Why did you Dem's not bring our oil jobs back home, and close our border? |
|
03-23-2011, 07:38 PM | #39 |
|
You really want to get the gov't back working for the majority of the People? Public finance all elections for Congress and the Presidency. Making accepting contributions a jailable offense, because dirty money is ruling today. Of course campaign finance is going to take those same greedy politicians who benefit the most from it to limit themselves. Think that's going to happen? Nope, until it all collapses around their heads they'll go right on as is. |
|
03-23-2011, 07:57 PM | #40 |
|
I think it would be hard to say that either party's bill is more than 2% better than the other party's bill. Its like buttered popcorn. If one person puts 98 sticks worth of butter on their popcorn and the other person puts 100 sticks worth of butter on their popcorn, can you really say the one who used only 98 sticks made "better popcorn" than the other one? Either way sounds pretty damn disgusting to me. Your inability to admit that the GOP's plan is better than the Dem's plan is fucking stunning... |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|