LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-06-2011, 03:47 PM   #1
WordofViagra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
439
Senior Member
Default Texas fires claim 1,000 homes; Perry to see Federal Disaster help, FEMA en route
Austin American-Stateman: http://www.statesman.com/news/local/...45.html?page=2

Perry said he also would seek a major disaster declaration from the federal government. A spokesman for Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Austin, said that Federal Emergency Management Agency officials will be on the ground in Central Texas this morning.

As Perry returned to his home state from the presidential campaign trail, fires that had started a day earlier continued burning in at least two Central Texas counties.

...

Retired Austin Assistant Fire Chief Kevin Baum, who studied the city's wildfire risk about eight years ago, likened the danger to "sleeping with a stick of wet dynamite."

"We've had some pretty epic wildfires over the years, but what is different today is that we have urban sprawl that is intermingled with wildland vegetation," he said.

Lake Travis Fire Rescue Chief Jim Linardos added: "The entire state, especially Central Texas, is under siege right now. We are going to do the best we can. That's the only promise I can make.
WordofViagra is offline


Old 09-06-2011, 04:15 PM   #2
EscaCsamas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Kill FEMA, but ask for its help... Maybe God is demonstrating how important disaster relief is. [/sarcasm]
EscaCsamas is offline


Old 09-06-2011, 10:13 PM   #3
brurdefdoro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
528
Senior Member
Default
With the explosive population growth in Texas over the past several years, it would seem that increased building density would dictate new building standards to minimize the spread of fires.

I've not seen any indication that standards have evolved, just lots of political grandstanding on Perry's part about how he's actualy done way with lots of regulations and made it a lot harder to sue businesses when a consumer has a problem. Businesses certainly welcome that, but sometimes regulations and legal recourse have their place.

If some of the homes that burned were promised to be resistant to things like embers hitting the roof but instead lit up like matchsticks, should the builder and materials-makers bear any responsibility?

In California, many areas have instituted things like bans on certain roofing materials that look pretty but burn too easily, standards on wall materials, etc. Then again, we implement home standards to accommodate the possibility of earthquakes as well as fires.

But as a result, we see a lot fewer homes destroyed in fires and a lot fewer homes destroyed in earthquakes. Other states point at us as an example of "job-killing regulations" run amok in home building standards, but this is precisely why those regulations exist.
brurdefdoro is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity