LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-26-2011, 06:56 PM   #1
occurrini

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default Supreme Court Supports AZ Law Punishing Illegal Hiring
Honestly, I'm okay with this. I think it's appropriate to punish companies which hire illegally, and is a good course of action if somebody is going to be held accountable for not hiring legal workers.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/05/26/sco...ex.html?hpt=T1

Washington (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has backed an Arizona law that punishes businesses hiring illegal immigrants, a law that opponents, including the Obama administration, say steps on traditional federal oversight over immigration matters.

The 5-3 ruling Thursday is a victory for supporters of immigration reform on the state level.

It was the first high court challenge to a variety of recent state laws cracking down on illegal immigrants, an issue that has become a political lightning rod.

The outcome could serve as a judicial warmup for a separate high-profile challenge to a more controversial Arizona immigration reform law working its way through lower courts. That statute would, among other things, give local police a greater role in arresting suspected illegal immigrants.

The hiring case turned on whether state law tramples on federal authority.

"Arizona has taken the route least likely to cause tension with federal law," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts. "It relies solely on the federal government's own determination of who is an unauthorized alien, and it requires Arizona employers to use the federal government's own system for checking employee status."

Arizona passed the Legal Arizona Workers Act in 2007, allowing the state to suspend the licenses of businesses that "intentionally or knowingly" violate work-eligibility verification requirements. Companies would be required under that law to use E-Verify, a federal database to check the documentation of current and prospective employees. That database had been created by Congress as a voluntary, discretionary resource.
occurrini is offline


Old 05-26-2011, 07:32 PM   #2
JaK_MarkoV_Pi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
I'm for that. The only downside I can foresee is the jobs that most if not all born U.S. citizens won't lower themselves to do may suffer (i.e., farmworkers).
JaK_MarkoV_Pi is offline


Old 05-26-2011, 11:22 PM   #3
Innockcroff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
And hotel workers and restaurant workers.
Innockcroff is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity