LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-19-2010, 03:38 AM   #1
JohnfAclambrJA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default Bush Tax Cuts Ushered in Slowest Economic Growth In 50 Years
NY Times:
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/20...od-for-growth/

Those tax cuts passed in 2001 amid big promises about what they would do for the economy. What followed? The decade with the slowest average annual growth since World War II. Amazingly, that statement is true even if you forget about the Great Recession and simply look at 2001-7.

The competition for slowest growth is not even close, either. Growth from 2001 to 2007 averaged 2.39 percent a year (and growth from 2001 through the third quarter of 2010 averaged 1.66 percent). The decade with the second-worst showing for growth was 1971 to 1980 — the dreaded 1970s — but it still had 3.21 percent average growth.

The picture does not change if you instead look at five-year periods. Here’s a chart ranking five-year periods over the past 50 years, in descending order of average annual growth:



Bureau of Economic Analysis, via Haver Analytics

I mean this as a serious question, not a rhetorical one: Given this history, why should we believe that the Bush tax cuts were pro-growth?

Is there good evidence the tax cuts persuaded more people to join the work force (because they would be able to keep more of their income)? Not really. The labor-force participation rate fell in the years after 2001 and has never again approached its record in the year 2000.

Is there evidence that the tax cuts led to a lot of entrepreneurship and innovation? Again, no. The rate at which start-up businesses created jobs fell during the past decade.

Every available piece of evidence seems to suggest that the Bush tax cuts did little to lift growth. I have yet to hear a good argument to the contrary, but I’d be fascinated to see another blogger or an economist take a crack at it.
JohnfAclambrJA is offline


Old 11-22-2010, 05:35 PM   #2
Teareerah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
There's tons of hard evidence out there which demonstrates that Republican economic policies are a massive drag on the economy; the only people who benefit are those already on the very tip-top of the wealth scale, and everyone else sees their disposable income decline, more dramatically the longer Repubs are in power. I just can't decide if those advocating that tax cuts=good! are really misinformed and believe their own lies, or if it's a scam to get everyday people to keep voting for economic policies that are against their own interests. Fascinating, really.
Teareerah is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity