Reply to Thread New Thread |
07-09-2010, 12:09 AM | #1 |
|
This goes under the category of "Better Late Than Never!"
http://www.boston.com/news/local/bre...eclares_3.html I know this is just the first step, and that this will end up before SCOTUS, but it's a major step in the right direction. Paulie |
|
07-09-2010, 11:19 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
07-10-2010, 02:07 AM | #5 |
|
Opponents of same-sex marriage condemned the ruling. Kris Mineau, president of Massachusetts Family Institute called it “another blatant example of a judge playing legislator.” Of course; anyone who disagrees with the conservative stance, regardless of judicial precedent, is "playing legislator," but judges who completely disregard judicial precedent for the whim of the conservative constituency is "standing up for American values."
Just out of curiosity, what do you all think are the chances of SCOTUS finding this act unconstitutional, given their recent rulings? |
|
07-10-2010, 02:49 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
07-11-2010, 02:36 AM | #7 |
|
|
|
07-11-2010, 10:38 AM | #8 |
|
Too late. A federal judge has already declared a part of DOMA unconstitutional. There will be other equal protection challenges from states which now allow gay marriages and it will end up in the Supreme Court. The question for this Court might be one of states' rights. When it comes to the area of family law, this conservative court has ruled fairly consistently for state sovereignty under the protection of the 10th Amendment.
Next up will be the California Prop 8 challenge, a much broader Constitutional challenge. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|