LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-27-2012, 03:36 AM   #21
CULTDIAMONDS

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Pointless wars with no end in sight and serving no real purpose except to feed the business of the war machine.
Pretty much.. We're making the world "safe for investment'
CULTDIAMONDS is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 03:38 AM   #22
craditc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
I was referring to our military footprint and the many "crusades" of our own..

Iran is an excellent example.
islam is communism for sand niggers. 'Infidels' are the convenient oppressor/strawman. What the west does isn't the catalyst...it's the excuse.
craditc is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 03:42 AM   #23
HotboTgameR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
islam is communism for sand niggers. 'Infidels' are the convenient oppressor/strawman. What the west does isn't the catalyst...it's the excuse.
There's been many examples of US intervention to fuel these Muslims.. It's a recruitment tool.

I have to say, if generations of Iranians wanted us dead for our actions there, alone.. They wouldn't be angry for nothing.
HotboTgameR is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 03:45 AM   #24
Ad0i89Od

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
I'm just not interested in running around the world, being dicks..

I think it's counter productive. I think it hurts American morale. I think it's expensive. I think it hurts our credibility on moral issues at large and compromises the US as a legitimate global leader and beacon of democracy.

I think it fuels wild eyed types to come after us and our interests.. And, I think it's a strategy that is failing us besides.

I mean, if it worked.. AT LEAST you could say something for it.

You could say it worked.. Now?

Even that is in question.. Making it a universal failure.
Ad0i89Od is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 03:48 AM   #25
JohnTruels

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
There's been many examples of US intervention to fuel these Muslims.. It's a recruitment tool.

I have to say, if generations of Iranians wanted us dead for our actions there, alone.. They wouldn't be angry for nothing.
I fail to see your point...




Iranians don't hate America...the mullahs do.
JohnTruels is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 03:56 AM   #26
BriKevin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
I fail to see your point...




Iranians don't hate America...the mullahs do.
The Muslim revolution in Iran happens to be our fault..
BriKevin is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:03 AM   #27
xresultsearch

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
The Muslim revolution in Iran happens to be our fault..
There is no fault to be given...US companies were trying to secure a stable oil supply...the natives wanted it for themselves. Shit happened, and here we are. That's it.
Well, that should have been it...but the sandniggers have gone a little overboard and are now a danger to human safety all over the world. They're fucking savagery isn't "OUR' fault, my friend.
THAT comes from within.
xresultsearch is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:08 AM   #28
BoomBully

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
We'll have to disagree on that.. I can't imagine that an Iranian national oil company is somehow less preferable to the situation in which we now find ourselves.

I'm just tired of all of it.. China has made great inroads, and they've done it without the ability, or even the need, to project global force.

I'd prefer to go that direction.
BoomBully is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:11 AM   #29
Innoloinarp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
I'm just tired of all of it.. China has made great inroads, and they've done it without the ability, or even the need, to project global force.
Precisely.
Innoloinarp is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:13 AM   #30
OccabsLam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Precisely.
Well, I'm glad someone else sees it that way..

This empire business is going to break us if we keep it up. And even if it didn't, it's immoral.

I just can't support it.
OccabsLam is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:14 AM   #31
everlastinge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
We'll have to disagree on that.. I can't imagine that an Iranian national oil company is somehow less preferable to the situation in which we now find ourselves.

I'm just tired of all of it.. China has made great inroads, and they've done it without the ability, or even the need, to project global force.

I'd prefer to go that direction.
Nonsense. Without the US experiences to learn from.. the Chinese would have stepped right the fuck in it had the shoe been on the other foot. They enjoy their relationships as a direct result of American influence. My point is that the resurgence of muslim fundamentalism was a go no matter what.
everlastinge is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:17 AM   #32
Evoncalabbalo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
I don't agree.. I think it's a fire and we're fueling it with an ever expanding series of foreign policy errors.

And even if that were not the case, I don't want to be a global bully anyway... Regardless.
Evoncalabbalo is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:23 AM   #33
Shemker394

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
China has made great inroads, and they've done it without the ability, or even the need, to project global force.
.
Well china has the enviable position of possessing millions upon millions of slave labor donors. Giving them a bit of competitive edge. WE DON'T... your reasoning left out a big factor.
Shemker394 is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:25 AM   #34
klubneras

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
Well china has the enviable position of possessing millions upon millions of slave labor donors. WE DON'T...your logic is highly flawed.
lol.. So.. In the absence of low wage workers, we need to deploy the US military in order to do global trade?

I see.. That's a novel concept.
klubneras is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:30 AM   #35
lomonel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
648
Senior Member
Default
lol.. So.. In the absence of low wage workers, we need to deploy the US military in order to do global trade?

I see.. That's a novel concept.
I don't honestly know what china is doing or why you think it's so much better than what everybody else is doing...so I can't really comment further.

As far as I know, though...there's only one chinese company (The Central Government) for any given foreign venture which really tends to tidy things up as far as competition goes...gnome sayin'?
lomonel is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:40 AM   #36
Pmeidstc

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Last I heard, china is massively increasing their naval fleet. Whadayathink they plan on doing with it?

















...project FOOOORCE!!?
Pmeidstc is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:41 AM   #37
new-nickname-zanovo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
Well, I'm glad someone else sees it that way..

This empire business is going to break us if we keep it up. And even if it didn't, it's immoral.

I just can't support it.
And for what? Momentary leverage, that could well change drastically within the next decade. There's nothing of any lasting substance to be gained here. Even your enemies secretly welcome your over-extending yourself this way. All the while, China sits back and waits to reap the very advantage you were looking for. And whilst never having to lift a finger in the meantime, to acquire it. When the US finally exhausts itself, China gains the upper hand by default. As an added bonus, the same reasons that made outsourcing so attractive to US firms, are compounded, as China becomes ever more enticing, and conditions at home become increasingly hostile to domestic investment. It all adds up to America's eventual reputation as a corporate pariah.

There's no upshot here.

Were I the conspinkey type, I could almost believe the WOT was a plot to undermine the US forever, via aggressive economic strategy. To make it fight itself, by fighting an enemy with limitless resources.

For America to win the war, only to discover you'd already been defeated, by going to war at all.
new-nickname-zanovo is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:44 AM   #38
disappointment2

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
When the US finally exhausts itself, China gains the upper hand by default. As an added bonus, the same reasons that made outsourcing so attractive to US firms, are compounded, as China becomes ever more enticing, and conditions at home become increasingly hostile to domestic investment. It all adds up to America's eventual reputation as a corporate pariah.

There's no upshot here.

Were I the conspinkey type, I could almost believe the WOT was a plot to undermine the US forever, via aggressive economic strategy. To make it fight itself.

For America to win the war, only to discover they'd already been defeated, by going to war at all. That's exactly how it looks from here.. A series of unforced errors and compound math.

The winner isn't us... But many will benefit from the greatest markets in the history of the world coming on line, and being at ground zero when they do.

It's an excellent conspiracy theory.. Almost too good.
disappointment2 is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 04:53 AM   #39
PoideAdelereX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
314
Senior Member
Default
Last I heard, china is massively increasing their naval fleet. Whadayathink they plan on doing with it?

















...project FOOOORCE!!?
Yeah, it's blue water.. Not coastal defense.

And there's only one thing you do with a blue water navy, project force abroad.

Some of that could have legitimate, defensive aims.. But that's what you do with it.
PoideAdelereX is offline


Old 08-27-2012, 05:02 AM   #40
arindiruppyr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
That's exactly how it looks from here.. A series of unforced errors and compound math.

The winner isn't us... But many will benefit from the greatest markets in the history of the world coming on line, and being at ground zero when they do.

It's an excellent conspiracy theory.. Almost too good.
Absolutely. There are future economic players we haven't heard from yet. It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest, if other currently languishing Asian nations, were to follow China's example. Perhaps not with the same economic clout, individually, but collectively, in a position to rival it. Because it's not too far-fetched an idea, to expect the emergence of new trading blocs.

The WOT is a fucking scam. They have no shortage of martyrs to recruit; even unto future generations of equally fanatical individuals. Most importantly, individuals with nothing to lose. Terrorism can't be beaten militarily. It's a pointless waste. Throwing good money after bad.

The mother of all guerrilla wars.
arindiruppyr is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity