LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-05-2012, 06:14 PM   #1
bxxasxxa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default I Can't Wait For Martial Law: I Love The Idea
http://www.westernjournalism.com/wil...mber-election/

Red Froman mentioned this I believe but I would thrive under Martial Law. I would make Soooo much money..... Damn I'm Good
bxxasxxa is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:07 PM   #2
CialisBestPrice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
576
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/8POwDE2WP48
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


YOU'RE AN IDIOT.
CialisBestPrice is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:09 PM   #3
WeightWatchyshow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Careful what you wish for. You would be among the first into the boxcars.
WeightWatchyshow is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:10 PM   #4
viepedorlella

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Well, a strongman could certainly fix things in a hurry..

But it won't work because no one can be trusted with such power. They'd quickly become a corrupt tyrant.
viepedorlella is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:13 PM   #5
Gvadelunar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/8POwDE2WP48
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


LIKE OUR CURRENT STRONGMAN, HARRY REID.
Gvadelunar is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:13 PM   #6
HonjUopu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
GET THAT OLD SON OF A BITCH OUT OF THERE!!!! GET THYEM ALL OUT
OF THERE!!!!!!!
HonjUopu is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:27 PM   #7
yxn2dC07

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
548
Senior Member
Default
If martial law became a reality there would be no death camps. Liberals hate capital punishment.
yxn2dC07 is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:32 PM   #8
ahagotyou

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
571
Senior Member
Default
If martial law were imposed prior to the election, couldn't the "electoral college" give the presidency to Shitt ?

Obama could not detain members of the House and Senate because that would be unconstitutional regardless if martial law were imposed or not. We all know Obama would never do anything unconstitutional.

STOP LAUGHING DAMNIT!
ahagotyou is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:34 PM   #9
Emunsesoxmete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
For three years, the Administration has worked to destroy the private sector and destabilize the value of the dollar. It has injected race and class into every argument, setting the stage for “summer riots” organized by Regime operatives. And when economic calamity and civil unrest are at their zenith, “…a false flag event against Obama or his family, something that will outrage ‘black America’ ” will be crafted, its purpose, to “…evoke the ugliest of reactions and create racial chaos in this country that will make the Watts riots, 1968 and the Rodney King riots pale in comparison.” And people wonder why many don't like "multiculturalism" shoved down our throats? It has opened up an opportunity for the Oblamer camp to take complete and absolute control of this once great nation.

Will they actually do this? I doubt it, there were many on the looney left who were positive that Bush would do this.
Emunsesoxmete is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:45 PM   #10
Trercakaressy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
If martial law became a reality there would be no death camps. Liberals hate capital punishment.
Only the allies ever ran death camps. A Jewish idea, first used through the British against the Boers. Then anywhere the Jews got the drop on the goyim. Go look at what they had the Brits do to the Bengalese. In the name of their East India co. To the chinese to sell Opium. Sasson.




Trercakaressy is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:49 PM   #11
Snuddyentaine

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
287
Senior Member
Default
Well, a strongman could certainly fix things in a hurry..

But it won't work because no one can be trusted with such power. They'd quickly become a corrupt tyrant.
Do you believe in the possibility of a benevolent dictator, J_X? I realise it's kinda contradictory, but do you accept it in theory?
Snuddyentaine is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:54 PM   #12
maxtp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
If martial law were imposed prior to the election, couldn't the "electoral college" give the presidency to Shitt ?

Obama could not detain members of the House and Senate because that would be unconstitutional regardless if martial law were imposed or not. We all know Obama would never do anything unconstitutional.

STOP LAUGHING DAMNIT!
Lincoln locked up the entire Maryland Legislature, if I remember correctly...
maxtp is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 08:58 PM   #13
Tainlyferfara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Do you believe in the possibility of a benevolent dictator, J_X? I realise it's kinda contradictory, but do you accept it in theory?
Wouldn't it be quite likely that the process of establishing a benevolent dictatorship would be exceedingly malevolent?
Tainlyferfara is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:00 PM   #14
preptarra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/8POwDE2WP48
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




FIRE THE CONGRESS.
preptarra is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:09 PM   #15
idertedype

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't it be quite likely that the process of establishing a benevolent dictatorship would be exceedingly malevolent?
One would think. Or the usual course is pursued right up to the point one takes power, before establishing a dictatorship.

Hitler springs to mind. Though of course he was less than benevolent.
idertedype is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:11 PM   #16
ceagsoosy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
They're all benevolent. Perspective is everything.
ceagsoosy is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:13 PM   #17
bumxumer

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Well, a strongman could certainly fix things in a hurry..

But it won't work because no one can be trusted with such power. They'd quickly become a corrupt tyrant.
You could trust me.
bumxumer is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:15 PM   #18
Buildityrit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
Only the allies ever ran death camps. A Jewish idea, first used through the British against the Boers. Then anywhere the Jews got the drop on the goyim. Go look at what they had the Brits do to the Bengalese. In the name of their East India co. To the chinese to sell Opium. Sasson.




good points
Buildityrit is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:42 PM   #19
bonyclayd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
671
Senior Member
Default
One would think. Or the usual course is pursued right up to the point one takes power, before establishing a dictatorship.

Hitler springs to mind. Though of course he was less than benevolent.
He was very benevolent to his own people, ethinic Germans.
bonyclayd is offline


Old 08-05-2012, 09:56 PM   #20
Shiplyopidomi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
He was very benevolent to his own people, ethinic Germans.
Dude, you're underlining a misspelling...
Shiplyopidomi is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity