Reply to Thread New Thread |
08-12-2012, 09:07 PM | #1 |
|
Rommney has picked the perfect man to be his running mate Paul Ryan the smartest man in the US House of Reps. We will now have 8 years of Rom/Ryan and then Ryan will be Elected in 2020 picking Rubio as his running mate, after that glorious 8 years of Conservative values, we'll get another 8 years of Rubio in 2028 and if he picks well for a VP maybe another 8 years after that!!
|
|
08-12-2012, 09:11 PM | #2 |
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 09:17 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 09:21 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 10:19 PM | #7 |
|
There's no such thing as a Republican in this country, not one that holds an office anyway. What is called a Republican now days is nothing more than a shill for the "Jews" (Khazar/Ashkenazim) otherwise know as NEO-CONSERVATIVES.
Let's hear it from a "Jew", the only people who's opinions are counted are considered worth anything on this Kosher forum. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel..._b_115999.html There is a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who unsuccessfully tried to get Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Saddam Hussein in the 1990s, and then successfully helped provide the intellectual rationale for George Bush to do it in 2003... Happily, these people represent a very small sliver of the Jewish population in this country...I remain proud of my Jewish heritage, a strong supporter of Israel...But I am not willing to grant these ideologues the anonymity they seek...I believe there are a small group of Jewish neoconservatives who are pushing for war with Iran because they believe it is in America's long-term interests and because they believe Israel's existence is at stake. They are wrong and recent history tells us they are dangerous. They are also bullies and I'm not going to be intimidated by them. I disagree with a couple of points here. First I don't think the Neo-conservatives ever pushed Netanyahu to do anything. If anything it was the other way around. If anyone was pushed it was George Bush. Those "ideologues" are not really anonymous to anyone who watches this kind of stuff themselves and has a half functional brain. They NEVER thought that attacking Iraq or Iran would be in America's interest. They KNOW it isn't, but they don't care because all these "Jews" care about is themselves. They only care about the US inasmuch as it is the cash cow that they have milked for so long and it also provides them with an abundant supply of goy cannon fodder. All the shucking and jiving in the world done by the Jewish community will never convince me it is anything more than an act put on for the benefit of gullible goyim who are naive enough to believe their is an ounce of loyalty to the US among them. |
|
08-12-2012, 10:34 PM | #8 |
|
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/lind1.html
Most neoconservative defense intellectuals have their roots on the left, not the right. They are products of the influential Jewish-American sector of the Trotskyist movement of the 1930s and 1940s, which morphed into anti-communist liberalism between the 1950s and 1970s and finally into a kind of militaristic and imperial right with no precedents in American culture or political history. Their admiration for the Israeli Likud party's tactics, including preventive warfare such as Israel's 1981 raid on Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor, is mixed with odd bursts of ideological enthusiasm for "democracy." They call their revolutionary ideology "Wilsonianism" (after President Woodrow Wilson), but it is really Trotsky's theory of the permanent revolution mingled with the far-right Likud strain of Zionism. Genuine American Wilsonians believe in self-determination for people such as the Palestinians. |
|
08-12-2012, 10:35 PM | #9 |
|
|
|
08-12-2012, 10:58 PM | #11 |
|
It's to bad for the former Constitutional United States that there are no Patriots alive who have the courage to place everything on the line to restore it, their livelihoods, and even their lives if necessary.
They are either too afraid to fight the Jewish usurpers and their brown and black hoards of helpers or are too willing to accept their bribes in exchange for selling the future of a once great nation. The rest are too ignorant, too lazy, or just blind. |
|
08-13-2012, 12:03 AM | #12 |
|
There's no such thing as a Republican in this country, not one that holds an office anyway. What is called a Republican now days is nothing more than a shill for the "Jews" (Khazar/Ashkenazim) otherwise know as NEO-CONSERVATIVES. |
|
08-13-2012, 12:07 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
08-13-2012, 12:15 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
08-13-2012, 01:32 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
08-13-2012, 08:25 PM | #18 |
|
Paul Ryan on Bailouts and Government Stimuli
Voted YES on TARP (2008) Voted YES on Economic Stimulus HR 5140 (2008) Voted YES on $15B bailout for GM and Chrysler. (Dec 2008) Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009) Paul Ryan on Entitlement Programs Voted YES on limited prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients. (Nov 2003) Voted YES on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers. (Jun 2006) Voted YES on extending unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks. (Oct 2008) Voted YES on Head Start Act (2007) Paul Ryan on Education Rep. Ryan went along with the Bush Administration in supporting more federal involvement in education. This is contrary to the traditional Republican position, which included support for abolition of the Department of Education and decreasing federal involvement in education. Voted YES on No Child Left Behind Act (2001) Paul Ryan on Civil Liberties Voted YES on federalizing rules for driver licenses to hinder terrorists. (Feb 2005) Voted YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005) Voted YES on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant. (Sep 2006) Paul Ryan on War and Intervention Abroad Voted YES on authorizing military force in Iraq. (Oct 2002) Voted YES on emergency $78B for war in Iraq & Afghanistan. (Apr 2003) Voted YES on declaring Iraq part of War on Terror with no exit date. (Jun 2006) Voted NO on redeploying US troops out of Iraq starting in 90 days. (May 2007) Congressman Ryan supports the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, federal bailouts, increased federal involvement in education, unconstitutional and undeclared wars, Medicare Part D (a multi-trillion dollar unfunded liability), stimulus spending, and foreign aid. According to Michelle Malkin in 2009, “[Paul Ryan]"... "hyped as a conservative rock-star" .... "gave one of the most hysterical speeches in the rush to pass TARP last fall; voted for the auto bailout; and voted with the Barney Frank-Nancy Pelosi AIG bonus-bashing stampede." |
|
08-13-2012, 08:26 PM | #19 |
|
|
|
08-13-2012, 08:40 PM | #20 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|