LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-18-2012, 03:51 AM   #1
PRengin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
421
Senior Member
Default Romney, Spics, Trends and the Electoral Vote.
Mitt-Bama doesn't even officially have the Republican Nomination yet and he's already changing his stripes on Immigration.

Remember, this is the guy who staked out the most Conservative position on Immigration in the entire field.. ZERO Amnesty from . Ever.. That's what he said.

Here's an example:



Now we get this:

Predicting that immigration would become a much larger issue in the fall campaign, told his audience, "We have to get Hispanic voters to vote for our party," warning that recent polling showing Hispanics breaking in huge percentages for President Obama "spells doom for us."

said the GOP must offer its own policies to woo Hispanics, including a "Republican DREAM Act," referring to the legislative proposal favored by Democrats that would offer illegal immigrants a limited path to citizenship, to give Hispanic voters a real choice between parties.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...undraiser?lite 's libtard "Church" of the LDS oppose immigration controls, btw.. and actively lobby against them.

’s Tough Immigration View Is at Odds With His Church

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us...pagewanted=all Why the & the GOP are shitting themselves over spics..

Consider this: Obama can get to 270 electoral votes (275 to be specific) by winning the following battleground states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Virginia. Under the scenario of this Hispanic path (CO, NM, NV, and VA), Obama doesn’t need to win Florida, Ohio, Iowa, or New Hampshire. That’s right -- this is a viable path to 270 that does not include EITHER Florida or Ohio. It’s pretty stunning.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...ic-moment?lite Obama currently holds a lead in all of these states.. The spic factor is cited as especially important in CO, NM, NV..

Here's an Electoral Map:

http://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/...llege_map.html

A quick look at the spic population in these states revels why they are important..

A list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispani...e_or_territory

Map:

http://www.censusscope.org/us/map_hispanicpop.html

One of the things I always hear is "ZOMG Texas!" "Why, all the spics here are Conservative! And they, ZOMG! WORK HARD!!! They're RELIABLE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES! CATHOLICS EVEN!!! So, they'll always vote for the Republican! That's the model for us, right there! Conservative Spics in Texas!"

This sounds good, and Republicans want to believe that.. but it's wrong.

Exit polls in Texas show that Obama got the spic vote, in Texas, to the tune of 2 to 1 over McCain.. For a total of 63%.

Here's a sortable list of exit polls from CNN. (Choose Texas from the drop down menu)

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/res...s/#val=TXP00p1

Graphic from Pew Research.



So, IOW, if the spics had their way, Texas would have become a Blue State in 08. Along with all these others, and more..

And these are allegedly the most "Conservative" spics in the nation..

Further examination of exit polls shows why this is such a significant factor in this race..

Nationally, all Latino demographic sub-groups voted for Obama by heavy margins. According to the national exit poll, 64% of Hispanic males and 68% of Hispanic females supported Obama. Latino youth, just as all youth nationwide, supported Obama over McCain by a lopsided margin -- 76% versus 19%.

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1024/exi...ysis-hispanics But that was 08, right? And McCain sucked, etc, etc.. So.. Maybe things are different now?

I don't have any reason to think so.. Pew Research tracks these trends and they say:

Spic support for Democrats/Republicans by year..

1999 58/25

2002 56/25

2004 55/28

2006 49/28

2007 57/23

2008 65/26


And it gets worse.. Back to the 08 trends survey.

65% of Latino registered voters identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, compared with just 26% who identify with or lean toward the GOP.

Over half of the registered spics vote.. 78% say they followed the 08 election closely. 72% in 04.

More than three-quarters (76%) of Hispanic registered voters have a favorable opinion of Obama, and 73% have a favorable opinion of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Family and pocketbook issues, such as education (93%), the cost of living (92%), jobs (91%) and health care (90%), are most important to Hispanic registered voters. Fewer Hispanics say that crime (82%), the war in Iraq (75%) or immigration (75%) is an extremely important or very important issue to them personally.

Half of all Latino voters (50%) believe Obama is better for immigrants, 12% believe McCain is better and 32% say there is no difference between the candidates.

More than half of Latino voters (55%) say that the Democratic Party is better for Latinos while just 6% say the Republican Party is better for Latinos.

Source: (PDF)

http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/90.pdf

As a result, spics cast a dark shadow over the future of Conservatism.. Not Republicanism, because most Republicans are happy to pander to them and try to buy them off.

But Conservatism can't abide this.. And Conservatives realize that attempting to out pander the liberals spells the death of the movement.

So, my analysis of the future is that it's much like being a Conservative in Illinois or California.. Utterly pointless.

Although there are deep Red pockets in these places, they're drug around by the major population centers and, frankly, are wasting their time voting for President.. They may as well leave the spot blank for all the good it will do them... Spics are natural Democrat votes and that's all there is to it.

If you look at Mexico, it's easy to see why this is.. They love subsidies there. They're "good" for the "poor"

They subsidize apartments, gasoline, diesel, gas, residential electricity and (Till recently, when a budget shortfall forced them to drop it.) even tortillas..

They'll be EASY for the democrats to pick off.. and hold.. Because, like with the niggers, they'll always be willing to go the extra mile and pander to them.

What you're seeing with Eric Holder pandering to the voter intimidating, bounty levying, New Black Panthers is nothing.. There's nothing that's too low for them in their quest for power.

And they're going to get it.. Unless something changes, it's a demographic certainty.

They stand a good chance now of helping to sweep Obama back into office for 4 more years.
PRengin is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:54 AM   #2
Rurcextedutty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/9ACgx2oDHAE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HE'S THE LEFT'S FIXER.


THEIR DELIVERANCE FROM OBAMA.... WHILE

RETAINING, EXPANDING, AND SETTING IN LAW THE OBAMA

AGENDA AND MORE.
Rurcextedutty is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:54 AM   #3
Squeernemergo

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
Mitt who?
Squeernemergo is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:55 AM   #4
occafeVes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
Death leads to birth.

We must die quicker.
occafeVes is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:56 AM   #5
sportbos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
MITT RAHMBAMA......

THAT'S WHO.
sportbos is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:56 AM   #6
desmond001

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
584
Senior Member
Default



FUCK DEATH IN THE ASS.


USE YOUR BRAIN, FOR ONCE.


RESTRAIN YOUR BREEDING, JUST A LITTLE.

THINGS WILL QUICKLY GET BETTER.
desmond001 is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:57 AM   #7
Itrtuawh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
MITT RAHMBAMA......

THAT'S WHO.
Ok.
Itrtuawh is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:58 AM   #8
gZAhTyWY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default



FUCK DEATH IN THE ASS.


USE YOUR BRAIN, FOR ONCE.


RESTRAIN YOUR BREEDING, JUST A LITTLE.

THINGS WILL QUICKLY GET BETTER.
Your kids are probably commies, you boomer cocksucker!
gZAhTyWY is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:58 AM   #9
DongoSab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
325
Senior Member
Default
Looks like the US will become part of Mexico in the future.
DongoSab is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:59 AM   #10
dahlilaninfo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Boomers: The gift that keeps on giving...

dahlilaninfo is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 03:59 AM   #11
Accor$314

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Looks like the US will become part of Mexico in the future.
It was in the past.
Accor$314 is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:00 AM   #12
Zvssxstw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
You'd want me to breed like a rabbit, Carl. But I like living within my means.
Zvssxstw is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:00 AM   #13
ElcinBoris

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Note:

Re-edited..
ElcinBoris is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:01 AM   #14
attishina

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
823
Senior Member
Default
Note:

Re-edited..
Edited, or re-edited?
attishina is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:02 AM   #15
sDePrx59

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Added electoral map.. and the libs are correct when they say Obama doesn't need OH or FL to win..
sDePrx59 is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:02 AM   #16
Nurba

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
Edited, or re-edited?
Both..
Nurba is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:03 AM   #17
Unlopssesuj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/9ACgx2oDHAE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


LOS ANGELES NEEDS MORE WATER...

WE'LL CHANNELIZE THESE TROUT STREAMS TO

GET WATER DOWN TO THE COAST MORE EFFICIENTLY.
Unlopssesuj is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:04 AM   #18
GitaraMoya

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/9ACgx2oDHAE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


WE MUST MAKE SACRIFICES TO ACCOMODATE OUR

RAPIDLY-EXPANDING POPULATION.
GitaraMoya is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:04 AM   #19
JewJoleSole

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
You'll leave the trout alone, thank you.

You had your chance. But you were too drunk to care. My turn, fucker.
JewJoleSole is offline


Old 04-18-2012, 04:05 AM   #20
xochex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
It was in the past.
When it was New Spain. Can't call it New Mexico or maybe they can.
xochex is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity