LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-03-2012, 04:14 PM   #1
TOPERink

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default Obama's Plan to Eliminate Suburbs
But Kurtz writes here that "Obama is not a fan of America’s suburbs. Indeed, he intends to abolish them. With suburban voters set to be the swing constituency of the 2012 election, the administration’s plans for this segment of the electorate deserve scrutiny. Obama is a longtime supporter of 'regionalism,' the idea that the suburbs should be folded into the cities, merging schools, housing, transportation, and above all taxation. To this end, the president has already put programs in place designed to push the country toward a sweeping social transformation in a possible second term. The goal: income equalization via a massive redistribution of suburban tax money to the cities."

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...minate_suburbs

Could it be true? Perhaps..

It would certainly explain his anti-growth agenda.. The guy is a zero growther for some reason. This could easily be it.
TOPERink is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:18 PM   #2
ebBPxIai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't such a process require the complicity of elements outside the government?

Such as schools, housing and transport are often private concerns. They're not obligated to comply.
ebBPxIai is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:19 PM   #3
MrsGoo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
569
Senior Member
Default
Fuck Obama.

He's not even my leader, and I'm beginning to hate the cunt.

Fucking fascist.
MrsGoo is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:19 PM   #4
EnubreBense

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default
Wouldn't such a process require the complicity of elements outside the government?

Such as schools, housing and transport are often private concerns. They're not obligated to comply.
No, it's more about increasing expenses and diverting revenue from suburbs to urban areas than, like, an outright abolition..

Like stealth taxing them, in an effort to make them less attractive.
EnubreBense is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:20 PM   #5
Duaceanceksm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
I know he's practicing steady state economics for some reason.. This article is based on a book on the subject, btw..

Perhaps that explains it?
Duaceanceksm is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:25 PM   #6
zdoppiklonikaa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Fuck Obama.

He's not even my leader, and I'm beginning to hate the cunt.

Fucking fascist.
Yeah.. When he was elected, I thought.. "Well, at least the abuses of the bush years will be behind us."

He's doubled down on the worst of it and added his own mess on top..

I hate these people. I don't know what they are, but they aren't Americans.
zdoppiklonikaa is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:26 PM   #7
zabiqapara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
No, it's more about increasing expenses and diverting revenue from suburbs to urban areas than, like, an outright abolition..

Like stealth taxing them, in an effort to make them less attractive.
He may be fucking himself. The more affluent members of society tend to live further afield than the inner cities. That's a hell of a lot of votes and influence. We're talking about alienating the very people he works alongside, after all. Not only them, but their families and friends. I'd wager there isn't a single member of Congress who doesn't live in suburbia.
zabiqapara is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:27 PM   #8
DoctorWeryDolt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
He may be fucking himself. The more affluent members of society tend to live further afield than the inner cities. That's a hell of a lot of votes and influence. We're talking about alienating the very people he works alongside, after all. Not only them, but their families and friends. I'd wager there isn't a single memebr of Congress who doesn't live in suburbia.
The truly affluent have enclaves like Jupiter Island.. They'll always be able to live wherever they want.

The middle class, however? They're the ones who are going to get squeezed the worst.

And who wouldn't want out of a terrible urban cesspool? Nobody in their right mind wants to raise children in an environment like that..
DoctorWeryDolt is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:33 PM   #9
Scukonahuy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
I also know that "Urban Sprawl" REALLY concerns liberals.. They view it as people taking their money and escaping.. Leaving the poor city with no revenue to provide for the least among us!!!!

Al Gore made mention of this numerous times and I never really understood the concern.. It's beginning to become more clear.

Their coalitions center in and around major population centers. They would lose much of their influence without them.

For example, a few heavily populated areas drag Illinois around by the nose..
Scukonahuy is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:34 PM   #10
twinaircant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
The concerns of the individual are always secondary..
twinaircant is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:35 PM   #11
codecouponqw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
547
Senior Member
Default
Washington spoke of a brewing conflict here.. So long ago..
codecouponqw is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 04:40 PM   #12
KJnbceja

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
The truly affluent have enclaves like Jupiter Island.. They'll always be able to live wherever they want.

The middle class, however? They're the ones who are going to get squeezed the worst.

And who wouldn't want out of a terrible urban cesspool? Nobody in their right mind wants to raise children in an environment like that..
Fucking A. The cities are jungles. If I had kids, I'd be loath to expose them to inner-city schooling.

Historically, the middle class have represented the centrist portion of most societies. It's a mistake to destroy that. To a large extent, they act to prevent polarisation. You do away with that at your peril. From another perspective, anyone who ever made any fundamental power grab, had to undermine the middle class first. At first glance, this doesn't look very good to me.

To me, it seems as though Obama is making all the right moves, if his intention is to institute an immovable oligarchy. I could be wrong, but his every gesture is aimed towards fostering imbalance. Hence this latest move. It all runs true to form.
KJnbceja is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 05:10 PM   #13
Brewpralgar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
Jettison the ballast, and the whole thing may capsize.

But then, perhaps that's the objective.
Brewpralgar is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 06:41 PM   #14
Grizli

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
451
Senior Member
Default

http://youtu.be/uhtabJn7ilg

http://youtu.be/ML8IH7F8P-k

http://youtu.be/RdVMQbZwP-0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'D LIKE TO SEE LAW AND ORDER RESTORED IN OUR URBAN CENTERS.

I'D LIKE TO SEE PEOPLE MOVE BACK TO TOWN... RIGHT DOWNTOWN.






OBAMA AND THE CONGRESS...AND "PROGRESSIVES" GENERALLY, ARE

THE PRIMARY OBSTACLE TO THAT.
Grizli is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 06:42 PM   #15
strongjannabiz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default

http://youtu.be/uhtabJn7ilg

http://youtu.be/ML8IH7F8P-k

http://youtu.be/RdVMQbZwP-0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



KIDS LOVE URBAN LIFE....


WE HAVE NO MORE CITIES.... WE HAVE BATTLE ZONES.
strongjannabiz is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 07:17 PM   #16
Skete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
I also know that "Urban Sprawl" REALLY concerns liberals.. They view it as people taking their money and escaping.. Leaving the poor city with no revenue to provide for the least among us!!!!

Al Gore made mention of this numerous times and I never really understood the concern.. It's beginning to become more clear.

Their coalitions center in and around major population centers. They would lose much of their influence without them.

For example, a few heavily populated areas drag Illinois around by the nose..
exactly.

revenue AND control.
Skete is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 07:47 PM   #17
Endatrybeeddy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
354
Senior Member
Default
LAWLESSNESS AND IDIOT BUREAUCRACY IN CITIES DRIVES SPRAWL.


I HATE BOTH.
Endatrybeeddy is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 07:48 PM   #18
bomondus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
PAY THE PERP....


TAX THE VICTIM.
bomondus is offline


Old 08-03-2012, 08:56 PM   #19
shinesw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
Fuck Obama.

He's not even my leader, and I'm beginning to hate the cunt.

Fucking fascist.
No, he's a damned marxist communist.
shinesw is offline


Old 08-04-2012, 12:44 AM   #20
FloareTraurne

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
553
Senior Member
Default
No, he's a damned marxist communist.
Exactly! But no one wants to believe it.
FloareTraurne is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity