[weaddercaps]

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

Follow that link and take a look at the smirking face.

How come police and military are exempt from these gun control measures?
Why is it always just aimed at just The People.

Well...well...lookie here...
I just found this over at the Chiefs of Police website:

http://www.theiacp.org/Portals/0/pdfs/DOTH-Critical-Issues.pdf

Page 4 under the heading, REDUCE FIREARMS VIOLENCE AND TARGET ILLEGAL GUNS

ACTION STEPS:
Support S. 32, the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act, introduced by Sen.
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).

There's a troubling list of gun control initiatives posted there.
Now why would the Chiefs of Police want to limit the public's ability to defend themselves equal to the police?
Shouldn't the police live by the same rules we do?
Is some group of government employees working towards a monopoly of force in the hands of government?

[Arrectiff]

The kikes and libtards are at it again.

[JesexhiSeeces]

Damn man, the Marxists never let up!

[wrefrinny]

It may be a blessing in disguise. If they keep up with this, it makes it more likely they'll be voted out next time, right?

[anderriter]

What about black powder? A black powder rifle is single shot and takes a couple minutes to reload. However the powder can be used to make a pipe bomb should they be restricted?

How about we just all bend over grab our ankles and invite the loony left to have their way with us?

[Thydaysuh]

Progressive DIRTBAGS Try SNEAKING Gun Control Amendment Into Cybersecurity Bill
I’m beyond tired of this sneaking legislation in a bill for one thing to undermine something completely different or the Constitution. How many bills have been passed for X that have amendments or sections for Y. Bills for Apples that apply to Oranges if you will. And it’s ALWAYS the DESTRUCTIVE DEGENERATE PROGRESSIVES (aka COMMUNISTS) that do this!

[Nidsstese]

Cybersecurity: There's going to be a shootin' someday online!

And our jewish politicians are wanting to protect us! And yeah, I just feel so much safer! None of you DLP people are ever going to shoot me as I post!

The one I am worried about the most is Moss - Take her cyber guns first! Please!!!!

[proslaviy]

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

Follow that link and take a look at the smirking face.

How come police and military are exempt from these gun control measures?
Why is it always just aimed at just The People.

Well...well...lookie here...
I just found this over at the Chiefs of Police website:

http://www.theiacp.org/Portals/0/pdfs/DOTH-Critical-Issues.pdf

Page 4 under the heading, REDUCE FIREARMS VIOLENCE AND TARGET ILLEGAL GUNS

ACTION STEPS:
Support S. 32, the Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act, introduced by Sen.
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ).

There's a troubling list of gun control initiatives posted there.
Now why would the Chiefs of Police want to limit the public's ability to defend themselves equal to the police?
Shouldn't the police live by the same rules we do?
Is some group of government employees working towards a monopoly of force in the hands of government?

Why do the police not want to be out gunned? Gee...I wonder?

[gvataler]

Time for the goy to give up their guns ! , they are just an extension of your penis anyway . You should trust the jews and your goverment .

[pageup85]

Why do the police not want to be out gunned? Gee...I wonder?

The thing is, CS, the citizenry are SUPPOSED to be able to protect THEMSELVES,

with HELP from the the police,

the Big Idea being that the police are BACKUP

TO THE CITIZENRY

for emergency situations.

[BoarmomorurrY]

The thing is, CS, the citizenry are SUPPOSED to be able to protect THEMSELVES,

with HELP from the the police,

the Big Idea being that the police are BACKUP

TO THE CITIZENRY

for emergency situations.

That's a little naive.

The police exist to maintain order.

[attanilifardy]

It IS supposed to work BOTH ways, though ~

that's why a sheriff can appoint a posse and the citizens are responsible to appoint a sheriff.

Rest assured, when push comes to shove, it's going to be YOUR ass on the first line of defence,

for the simple fact that until the "order" is disrupted,

it's sort of "maintain"ing itself...

[sposicke]

It IS supposed to work BOTH ways, though ~

that's why a sheriff can appoint a posse and the citizens are responsible to appoint a sheriff.

Rest assured, when push comes to shove, it's going to be YOUR ass on the first line of defence,

for the simple fact that until the "order" is disrupted,

it's sort of "maintain"ing itself...

You're right, and I'm sure your knees are very pretty.

I would add that, while order is maintained, as you say, the police would feel no particular obligation to pick a side. They're as in love with their friendly, kitten-rescuing image as everyone else.

Until of course, they must pick a side.

And it won't be yours.

[ancexttew]

It IS supposed to work BOTH ways, though ~

that's why a sheriff can appoint a posse and the citizens are responsible to appoint a sheriff.

Rest assured, when push comes to shove, it's going to be YOUR ass on the first line of defence,

for the simple fact that until the "order" is disrupted,

it's sort of "maintain"ing itself...

I've been kind of hard on you lately, so I want to make sure to give you credit when it is due. You nailed this one. Nice work.

[Lvnufcdc]

Mini-bots and Micro-bots are the future. You slip into Facilities with something small and undetectable then plug into the Network and infect with a backdoor. Then at the right time you shut down their Command and Control. Remember they don't have enough boots on the ground to squash a large rebellion. Once you tie up the military then you take the capital. Then you re-organize the Government. Get rid of all the Foreign entities and private interests influence. Direct Democracy is now available. The technology is there. Get rid of all the stupid laws that no one wants.

[JanetMorris]

WASHINGTON (AP) — On a trip to Israel, Mitt is trying to win over a tiny sliver of a small — but powerful — section of the American electorate. President Barack Obama is doing the same at home.

[CindyLavender]

Why do the police not want to be out gunned? Gee...I wonder?

Why does the citizenry not want to be out gunned? Gee... I wonder?

[Cucoulkrory]

Why does the citizenry not want to be out gunned? Gee... I wonder?

LMAO......

[nikolapegayyyaasss]

Sheesh...These liberals who have total trust in our gov.

The 2nd amendment is there to protect US from THEM, police included.