LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-29-2012, 05:18 AM   #1
Buildityrit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default List of the 21 Tax Hikes in Obamacare.
http://www.atr.org/full-list-obamacare-tax-hikes-a6996

Pretty big list..
Buildityrit is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:23 AM   #2
TheBestCheapestOEM

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
Why in the hell are tax hikes that have nothing to do with healthcare in that bill?
Did you notice the surtax on investment income?
WOW, those sly bastards.
TheBestCheapestOEM is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:27 AM   #3
Kk21pwa9

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
Because THEY can?
Kk21pwa9 is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:29 AM   #4
bestworkother

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
bestworkother is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:33 AM   #5
bridsanaeds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Why in the hell are tax hikes that have nothing to do with healthcare in that bill?
Did you notice the surtax on investment income?
WOW, those sly bastards.
Because the 46% that are paying taxes, can't cover the long term costs. Also, that 46% will begin to dwindle.

And as Archaeus stated, THEY can?

Apparently, they can do anything they want.
bridsanaeds is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:35 AM   #6
hLabXZlK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
545
Senior Member
Default
Because the 46% that are paying taxes, can't cover the long term costs. Also, that 46% will begin to dwindle.

And as Archaeus stated, THEY can?

Apparently, they can do anything they want.
Guess so. They cound not get the tax hikes through a bill in congress so they simply added it to OblamerCare.

I HATE this government.
hLabXZlK is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:43 AM   #7
rolex-buy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Did you see the Surtax on Investment Income?

OMG.. Over 40% for the "rich" from 15!!!
rolex-buy is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:43 AM   #8
Soypopetype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
The economy is going to do a fucking headstand.
Soypopetype is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:48 AM   #9
lollypopz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
2. Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Tax hike of $4.5 billion). This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed.
lollypopz is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:50 AM   #10
SobiquYo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
4. Tax on Innovator Drug Companies ($22.2 bil/Jan 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

Read more: http://www.atr.org/full-list-obamaca...#ixzz1z99ozAbu

These companies already charge and arm and a leg as it is. So, we already know who's going to foot this bill. I'm assuming this will be on all new drugs before their patents expire?
SobiquYo is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 05:51 AM   #11
Wrencytet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
1. Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals (Min$/immediate): $50,000 per hospital if they fail to meet new "community health assessment needs," "financial assistance," and "billing and collection" rules set by HHS

Abortion and niggers!
Wrencytet is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 06:22 AM   #12
AricGoffgog

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
While spending on the food stamp program has increased 100 percent under President Barack Obama, the government continues to push more Americans to enroll in the welfare program.The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has embraced entire promotional campaigns designed to encourage eligible Americans to participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/27/us...#ixzz1z9IVFGEM
AricGoffgog is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 06:23 AM   #13
ycMC0PLg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
So if Catholic Hospitals refuse to perform abortions and hand out Birth Control they'll be fined!!
I'm sure that's the goal..
ycMC0PLg is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 06:25 AM   #14
Jannet.K

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/_LBmUwi6mEo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FIRE THEM ALL.
Jannet.K is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 06:34 AM   #15
fiettariaps

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
ITS TIME FOR A BLACK MAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE !
fiettariaps is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 03:22 PM   #16
CoallyPax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
357
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/_LBmUwi6mEo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


THAT HICK FROM HOT SPRINGS HAD SOME NIGGER IN HIM...
CoallyPax is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 03:30 PM   #17
BadbarmrapBef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
514
Senior Member
Default
4. Tax on Innovator Drug Companies ($22.2 bil/Jan 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

Read more: http://www.atr.org/full-list-obamaca...#ixzz1z99ozAbu

These companies already charge and arm and a leg as it is. So, we already know who's going to foot this bill. I'm assuming this will be on all new drugs before their patents expire?
Obama and the other goons on the left seem to forget how many lives are saved annually by those "Innovator Drug Companies". So if a company spends zillions of hours creating a drug that will help people, they will be penalized for it via another tax on top of what they already pay. Yes, there's motivation right there.
BadbarmrapBef is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 03:36 PM   #18
polleroy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
2. Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Tax hike of $4.5 billion). This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed.
Is that not what those deductions are for? Am I missing something here?
polleroy is offline


Old 06-29-2012, 04:51 PM   #19
ddxbovMQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
342
Senior Member
Default
These 2 appear to be designed to eliminate private insurance companies and penalize people who actually want to have their own Health Insurance policies.



19. Tax on Health Insurers ($60.1 bil/Jan 2014): Annual tax on the industry imposed relative to health insurance premiums collected that year. Phases in gradually until 2018. Fully-imposed on firms with $50 million in profits. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,986-1,993

Taxes that take effect in 2018:
20. Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans ($32 bil/Jan 2018): Starting in 2018, new 40 percent excise tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans ($10,200 single/$27,500 family). Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,941-1,956


Read more: http://www.atr.org/full-list-obamaca...#ixzz1zBqUlmZ0
ddxbovMQ is offline


Old 06-30-2012, 04:08 AM   #20
Phighicle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
482
Senior Member
Default
All this shit will just get passed down to the end user.
Phighicle is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:34 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity