Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
..a powerful case against
![]() ![]() http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/22...biden-and-bain They're making a mistake here.. Obama track record is failure squared... Yet they're attacking ![]() And, compared to a hapless community organizer with no experience doing absolutely anything relevant to the private sector.. A lot of people are going to see this as a plus. They're scared.. People lost their jobs, homes and savings and NOW they're finally paying attention. So, the "powerful argument" is to present them with a contrast between Obama/Carter/Maliase Guy and ![]() I say people are going to want that vulture working for them.. Also: Why not? What do they have to lose at this point? Are things going so well that anyone will fear ![]() I doubt it.. This looks like a case of your enemy destroying himself. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. Will That was always my problem with him.. He has words. Somebody like Newt? He has deeds. Perry - Deeds. Cain - experience, deeds. Paul? A record, convictions.. But, still.. if the contest is a contrast between Mr. Win and More of the Same.. I'd hand the edge to ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
The only way we'll know is if he gets elected. ![]() He stakes out some very conservative positions, and none of them seem to be hurting him. He has a plan that reads will, but does he believe it? An Obama like failure that throws dems into Congress in 14 will just about cripple any hope for serious reform.. Including SC nominees. All of it goes up in the air (again) if Mittens fails.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
And that's the downside of a candidate like All I know is he's much much more qualified to be POTUS than Obama. I will vote for ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
The worst thing about Obama [job creation] is the best thing about |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Not a chance in hell of that happening. He wouldn't gain anything by picking "The Donald" for his VEEP choice. That would be like McCain picking Lieberman as his VEEP choice. Two mushy middle of the road independents. In the case of Trump & Mitt, it would be 2 rich white businessmen. Mitt will pick someone very conservative, like Rubio or Portman or Daniels. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
The Donald is very popular. And I can't imagine he isn't trying to get something out of this. And let's be realistic, Trump knows a lot about the economy, he understands what's going on with China and he would be a great running mate because he will say all the blunt stuff against Obama so |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
I agree with that. I just don't see it happening. He needs some balance and Trump isn't it. Besides, I think most independents (foolishly) aren't interested in the impact of China. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
![]() http://youtu.be/uhtabJn7ilg http://youtu.be/RdVMQbZwP-0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FIRE THEM ALL.... OR GO MAKE TURD PIES. SAME RESULT. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|