LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 05-19-2012, 07:02 PM   #1
cigsstorenick

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default Where does the Republican party go too far?
Now, this isn't to say that you don't support these things at all.. It's not an either/or thing.. It's relative.

Just select areas where you think it MIGHT be better if GOP would dial it back a notch or two?

Choose all that apply.
cigsstorenick is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 07:17 PM   #2
Derrida

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
Military spending is consuming far too much of our resources.
Derrida is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 07:25 PM   #3
indianstory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
532
Senior Member
Default

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


MILITARY SPENDING SHOULD BE 70-80% OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET.
indianstory is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 07:33 PM   #4
MaickiP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
641
Senior Member
Default
I simply believe that we should have clear well understood lines drawn in the sand with enemies of America. Let it be known that if those lines are crossed that you and your country will be destroyed.
MaickiP is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 08:56 PM   #5
dayclaccikere

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Military spending is consuming far too much of our resources.
Government procurement is not efficient. much of what is spent on the military is wasted by the beaurocracy and needless regulations.

But, we should demand that the host country pay 100% of the cost of any base in that country, if they won't or can't pay, close the base.
dayclaccikere is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 09:19 PM   #6
Pataacculako

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
371
Senior Member
Default

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


MILITARY SPENDING SHOULD BE 70-80% OF THE FEDERAL BUDGET.
Yeah, and the budget should be 20% of what it is today..
Pataacculako is offline


Old 05-19-2012, 09:28 PM   #7
AlexBrith

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/car...r_05172012.gif
AlexBrith is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 01:26 AM   #8
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Military spending is consuming far too much of our resources.
.
this i s because politicens support Israel and give money for militaire defence
.
.
.
.
.
softy54534 is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 02:04 AM   #9
pkxlugbsbv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
Send the kikes back to Israel, send the spics back to Mexico.
pkxlugbsbv is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 02:31 AM   #10
Emunsesoxmete

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
Send the kikes back to Israel, send the spics back to Mexico.
Or send the spics to Israel, and the kikes to mexico..........

Then nuke both of them.
Emunsesoxmete is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 02:34 AM   #11
FinanseMikky

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Let's face it.

The Republican Party is a shitshow, at this point.
FinanseMikky is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 04:44 AM   #12
casinobonuscxz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Let's face it.

The Republican Party is a shitshow, at this point.
You're going to upset Rocat with posts like that.
casinobonuscxz is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 05:22 AM   #13
Veveseinlep

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
Rocat only wants to save the country from assured destruction. Why so harsh?
Veveseinlep is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 05:33 AM   #14
Veronnisa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
342
Senior Member
Default
I do not mind legal immigration, but it should not be made a pawn to get votes. Just enforce the laws already on the books (illegal to enter without permission, illegal to hire someone not authorized to work in this nation, etc.) If some one is caught who has entered illegally place him/her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for Cancellation of Removal for Non-Permanent residents. If it is a green card holder who has violated the law put him or her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for cancellation of removal for permanent residents.

We do not need new laws, or new forms of relief. We just need to enforce the current laws and allow those facing removal to apply for the forms of relief currently available.

Oh that's right if we go with what we have we may not get the Hispanic vote. Well ask the average Hispanic waiting to come into this country legally, or those that have waited, if they want fence jumpers to get special treatment they did not.
Veronnisa is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 06:37 AM   #15
EjPWyPm4

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
540
Senior Member
Default
I do not mind legal immigration, but it should not be made a pawn to get votes. Just enforce the laws already on the books (illegal to enter without permission, illegal to hire someone not authorized to work in this nation, etc.) If some one is caught who has entered illegally place him/her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for Cancellation of Removal for Non-Permanent residents. If it is a green card holder who has violated the law put him or her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for cancellation of removal for permanent residents.

We do not need new laws, or new forms of relief. We just need to enforce the current laws and allow those facing removal to apply for the forms of relief currently available.

Oh that's right if we go with what we have we may not get the Hispanic vote. Well ask the average Hispanic waiting to come into this country legally, or those that have waited, if they want fence jumpers to get special treatment they did not.
Any idea how long and expensive that would be?
EjPWyPm4 is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 06:38 AM   #16
f29sXS07

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
Any idea how long and expensive that would be?
...and I don't mean for them.
f29sXS07 is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 06:44 AM   #17
enactolaelant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
I do not mind legal immigration, but it should not be made a pawn to get votes. Just enforce the laws already on the books (illegal to enter without permission, illegal to hire someone not authorized to work in this nation, etc.) If some one is caught who has entered illegally place him/her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for Cancellation of Removal for Non-Permanent residents. If it is a green card holder who has violated the law put him or her in removal proceedings and allow them to apply for cancellation of removal for permanent residents.

We do not need new laws, or new forms of relief. We just need to enforce the current laws and allow those facing removal to apply for the forms of relief currently available.

Oh that's right if we go with what we have we may not get the Hispanic vote. Well ask the average Hispanic waiting to come into this country legally, or those that have waited, if they want fence jumpers to get special treatment they did not.
Legal immigrants and naturalized citizens don't hate illegals. They hate their citizen action groups. A particularly noticeable tendency amongst Hispanic citizens. The idea that there's only a river to cross as opposed to an ocean should give carte blanche without obeying the law is arrogant at best. The idea that educated or highly skilled labor should be given preference in the immigration process is simply good sense.


...and how many immigration attorneys in the South-west aren't of Hispanic heritage? I'd guess not many.
enactolaelant is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 06:44 AM   #18
ZZChristopher

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
337
Senior Member
Default
Sterilize illegals then release them.
ZZChristopher is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 06:46 AM   #19
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Sterilize illegals then release them.
Who's going to pay for that?
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 05-20-2012, 04:53 PM   #20
UTHZzJ6f

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Legal immigrants and naturalized citizens don't hate illegals. They hate their citizen action groups. A particularly noticeable tendency amongst Hispanic citizens. The idea that there's only a river to cross as opposed to an ocean should give carte blanche without obeying the law is arrogant at best. The idea that educated or highly skilled labor should be given preference in the immigration process is simply good sense.


...and how many immigration attorneys in the South-west aren't of Hispanic heritage? I'd guess not many.
I didn't say legal permanent residents or those waiting for their applications to be approved hate illegals. I merely put forth that they should be asked if they want fence jumpers to get special treatment.

In other words ask the people that obeyed the law if they want to see those who have violated the law rewarded or if they want them to go to the back of the line.
UTHZzJ6f is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity