[PRengin]

Mitt-Bama doesn't even officially have the Republican Nomination yet and he's already changing his stripes on Immigration.

Remember, this is the guy who staked out the most Conservative position on Immigration in the entire field.. ZERO Amnesty from . Ever.. That's what he said.

Here's an example:



Now we get this:

Predicting that immigration would become a much larger issue in the fall campaign, told his audience, "We have to get Hispanic voters to vote for our party," warning that recent polling showing Hispanics breaking in huge percentages for President Obama "spells doom for us."

said the GOP must offer its own policies to woo Hispanics, including a "Republican DREAM Act," referring to the legislative proposal favored by Democrats that would offer illegal immigrants a limited path to citizenship, to give Hispanic voters a real choice between parties.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...undraiser?lite 's libtard "Church" of the LDS oppose immigration controls, btw.. and actively lobby against them.

’s Tough Immigration View Is at Odds With His Church

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/03/us...pagewanted=all Why the & the GOP are shitting themselves over spics..

Consider this: Obama can get to 270 electoral votes (275 to be specific) by winning the following battleground states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Virginia. Under the scenario of this Hispanic path (CO, NM, NV, and VA), Obama doesn’t need to win Florida, Ohio, Iowa, or New Hampshire. That’s right -- this is a viable path to 270 that does not include EITHER Florida or Ohio. It’s pretty stunning.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news...ic-moment?lite Obama currently holds a lead in all of these states.. The spic factor is cited as especially important in CO, NM, NV..

Here's an Electoral Map:

http://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/...llege_map.html

A quick look at the spic population in these states revels why they are important..

A list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispani...e_or_territory

Map:

http://www.censusscope.org/us/map_hispanicpop.html

One of the things I always hear is "ZOMG Texas!" "Why, all the spics here are Conservative! And they, ZOMG! WORK HARD!!! They're RELIABLE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES! CATHOLICS EVEN!!! So, they'll always vote for the Republican! That's the model for us, right there! Conservative Spics in Texas!"

This sounds good, and Republicans want to believe that.. but it's wrong.

Exit polls in Texas show that Obama got the spic vote, in Texas, to the tune of 2 to 1 over McCain.. For a total of 63%.

Here's a sortable list of exit polls from CNN. (Choose Texas from the drop down menu)

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/res...s/#val=TXP00p1

Graphic from Pew Research.



So, IOW, if the spics had their way, Texas would have become a Blue State in 08. Along with all these others, and more..

And these are allegedly the most "Conservative" spics in the nation..

Further examination of exit polls shows why this is such a significant factor in this race..

Nationally, all Latino demographic sub-groups voted for Obama by heavy margins. According to the national exit poll, 64% of Hispanic males and 68% of Hispanic females supported Obama. Latino youth, just as all youth nationwide, supported Obama over McCain by a lopsided margin -- 76% versus 19%.

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1024/exi...ysis-hispanics But that was 08, right? And McCain sucked, etc, etc.. So.. Maybe things are different now?

I don't have any reason to think so.. Pew Research tracks these trends and they say:

Spic support for Democrats/Republicans by year..

1999 58/25

2002 56/25

2004 55/28

2006 49/28

2007 57/23

2008 65/26

And it gets worse.. Back to the 08 trends survey.

65% of Latino registered voters identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, compared with just 26% who identify with or lean toward the GOP.

Over half of the registered spics vote.. 78% say they followed the 08 election closely. 72% in 04.

More than three-quarters (76%) of Hispanic registered voters have a favorable opinion of Obama, and 73% have a favorable opinion of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Family and pocketbook issues, such as education (93%), the cost of living (92%), jobs (91%) and health care (90%), are most important to Hispanic registered voters. Fewer Hispanics say that crime (82%), the war in Iraq (75%) or immigration (75%) is an extremely important or very important issue to them personally.

Half of all Latino voters (50%) believe Obama is better for immigrants, 12% believe McCain is better and 32% say there is no difference between the candidates.

More than half of Latino voters (55%) say that the Democratic Party is better for Latinos while just 6% say the Republican Party is better for Latinos.

Source: (PDF)

http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/90.pdf

As a result, spics cast a dark shadow over the future of Conservatism.. Not Republicanism, because most Republicans are happy to pander to them and try to buy them off.

But Conservatism can't abide this.. And Conservatives realize that attempting to out pander the liberals spells the death of the movement.

So, my analysis of the future is that it's much like being a Conservative in Illinois or California.. Utterly pointless.

Although there are deep Red pockets in these places, they're drug around by the major population centers and, frankly, are wasting their time voting for President.. They may as well leave the spot blank for all the good it will do them... Spics are natural Democrat votes and that's all there is to it.

If you look at Mexico, it's easy to see why this is.. They love subsidies there. They're "good" for the "poor"

They subsidize apartments, gasoline, diesel, gas, residential electricity and (Till recently, when a budget shortfall forced them to drop it.) even tortillas..

They'll be EASY for the democrats to pick off.. and hold.. Because, like with the niggers, they'll always be willing to go the extra mile and pander to them.

What you're seeing with Eric Holder pandering to the voter intimidating, bounty levying, New Black Panthers is nothing.. There's nothing that's too low for them in their quest for power.

And they're going to get it.. Unless something changes, it's a demographic certainty.

They stand a good chance now of helping to sweep Obama back into office for 4 more years.