[poispanna]

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/12/wh...witch-to-paul/

"Most Republicans who hold faith, family values and life as top priorities when selecting a candidate also want to seriously cut spending and reduce government. These folks accounted for most of Santorum’s support. Ron Paul is a conservative whose limited-government record is irrefutable — but who is also a devout Christian, 100% pro-life and has been married to the same woman for 50 years. In Paul, conservatives are rid of some of the things that made Santorum less attractive — big spending, government growth — but also have a candidate who has been a lifelong social conservative in more ways than many Republicans realize..."

[PRengin]

So they can vote for another guy who will never be president?

[NikkitaZ]

So they can vote for another guy who will never be president?

He most likely never will be the nexy president, but he should be. At least he's not that centrist phony or that mayonnaise-head Gingrich.

[ambientambien]

I'll never vote for .
I don't trust him.

[avodeinst]

Man, if it comes down to that GD nigger verse , I will have to vote for the white guy. And that hurts to say that because I hate the white guy. And that's the first time I will have voted against somebody verse for somebody. But I will make an exception for the nigger.

They cheated Paul so much, it just doesn't look good for him. But that's who I'd like to vote for.

[mikeydesignzinc]

ALL CULTURES IN ALL ERAS LOVE GOATS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU.

THE TROUT DON'T GIVE A DAMN.

[Patamuta]

[VodsNittats]

So they can vote for another guy who will never be president?

will never be President, ever.

[Info-phone]

will never be President, ever.

That's what us true conservatives are hoping for.

[DoctorDulitlBest]

That's what us true conservatives are hoping for.

It is a no win for the GOP. will take a beating in November. When that happens, history shows parties revert to the polar extreme, and the far right wing of the GOP can not win a national election 1 on 1 either. Future presidents will be elected from 3 party system by less than 40% of the vote, watch and see

[kimaddison]

Good post!

[ChyFDjfed]

ALL CULTURES IN ALL ERAS LOVE GOATS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


MONGO SANTAMARIA BAND

[Anypeny]

http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/12/wh...witch-to-paul/

"Most Republicans who hold faith, family values and life as top priorities when selecting a candidate also want to seriously cut spending and reduce government. These folks accounted for most of Santorum’s support. Ron Paul is a conservative whose limited-government record is irrefutable — but who is also a devout Christian, 100% pro-life and has been married to the same woman for 50 years. In Paul, conservatives are rid of some of the things that made Santorum less attractive — big spending, government growth — but also have a candidate who has been a lifelong social conservative in more ways than many Republicans realize..."

Logical fallacy... I don't give a fuck what ron paul has done to prove he's a pro-life, anti-gay, Christian warrior... his beliefs are retarded. "States rights" would make any moral attempt will fall apart. How far do you think "state's rights" will go? What's the point of being against homosexuality, against abortion, or against anything... if they can just vote differently in another state?

It's a delusion. Conservative libertarians are delusional fuckwits, living in an autistic dream world... where "it's not bad as long as it isn't in front of me". You want to live your lives, in denial... and that's why you've lost everything. You have no rights, your job sucks, your lives are worthless and without meaning, your kids are ugly and stupid, and you're going to die.

If something is good, then it should be spread outward... to everybody. A good system, and upstanding morals, should not be isolated. Nor if something is bad, should you keep it specified to your neck of the woods. If it's bad, it's bad everywhere. And you are only proving yourself to be a shortsighted, hypocritical, self-destructive moron... by not noticing this.

You want democracy? Fine. You want totalitarianism? Fine. You want anarchy? Fine.

But don't fucking tell me it's good for some, but not others. "Some animals are more equal then others..." Everyone should be treated equally good, or equally bad. Live by the same standards, that way we can at least say we have equality if not liberty. Those that undermine equality, never seem to give a fuck about liberty. Which is why I'm having to fight this battle against internet censorship alone... because everyone thinks they live inside a vacuum, where nothing effects them, it's perfectly fine someone, somewhere is being oppressed and bullied... so long as they don't have to know about it.

Einstein said evil prevails when good men do nothing. I'd go a step further in suggesting evil men do nothing... If you refuse to stand up for what is right, apply your morals universally, and take action. Then you are evil.

[Kemapreedasse]

HIS RADIANT SAGACIOUSNESS, SULTAN THE GOAT
http://youtu.be/nBKhqvam8Yg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://youtu.be/TdzMbaOcHS0

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~










FUCK SEXUAL POLITICS.

[ThzinChang]

Jim's usual drivel

How's that neck beard coming along, Jim?

[himecthekWiff]

Good post!

They got my vote! Both of em!

[TriammaMade]

Logical fallacy... I don't give a fuck what ron paul has done to prove he's a pro-life, anti-gay, Christian warrior... his beliefs are retarded. "States rights" would make any moral attempt will fall apart. How far do you think "state's rights" will go? What's the point of being against homosexuality, against abortion, or against anything... if they can just vote differently in another state?

It's a delusion. Conservative libertarians are delusional fuckwits, living in an autistic dream world... where "it's not bad as long as it isn't in front of me". You want to live your lives, in denial... and that's why you've lost everything. You have no rights, your job sucks, your lives are worthless and without meaning, your kids are ugly and stupid, and you're going to die.

If something is good, then it should be spread outward... to everybody. A good system, and upstanding morals, should not be isolated. Nor if something is bad, should you keep it specified to your neck of the woods. If it's bad, it's bad everywhere. And you are only proving yourself to be a shortsighted, hypocritical, self-destructive moron... by not noticing this.

You want democracy? Fine. You want totalitarianism? Fine. You want anarchy? Fine.

But don't fucking tell me it's good for some, but not others. "Some animals are more equal then others..." Everyone should be treated equally good, or equally bad. Live by the same standards, that way we can at least say we have equality if not liberty. Those that undermine equality, never seem to give a fuck about liberty. Which is why I'm having to fight this battle against internet censorship alone... because everyone thinks they live inside a vacuum, where nothing effects them, it's perfectly fine someone, somewhere is being oppressed and bullied... so long as they don't have to know about it.

Einstein said evil prevails when good men do nothing. I'd go a step further in suggesting evil men do nothing... If you refuse to stand up for what is right, apply your morals universally, and take action. Then you are evil.

Whoa, Jim. You're making a lot of mistakes, right there.

First of all, "might makes right" is not a very honorable position. It is generally a position held by cowards and misanthropes.

I honestly don't care if you do all kinds of things, so long as you don't do them in my community. I just don't give a fuck. And try as I might, I can't make myself give a fuck. It doesn't register. I only care about what and who I care about. And whether what you do affects us. That's just reality.

[Bill-Watson]

SOUNDS VERY CONTROLLING.

[viagradiscounttt]

It is a no win for the GOP. will take a beating in November. When that happens, history shows parties revert to the polar extreme, and the far right wing of the GOP can not win a national election 1 on 1 either. Future presidents will be elected from 3 party system by less than 40% of the vote, watch and see

What the fuck are you talking about? Are you going to follow this up with the obligatory "but I hate Obama" to pretend that you aren't donating to his campaign? There will be no "3 party system" for the foreseeable future. 3rd parties have no traction in this country. Everybody knows this.

LOL @ Sarah's transparency.

[toreesi]

Whoa, Jim. You're making a lot of mistakes, right there.

First of all, "might makes right" is not a very honorable position. It is generally a position held by cowards and misanthropes.

I honestly don't care if you do all kinds of things, so long as you don't do them in my community. I just don't give a fuck. And try as I might, I can't make myself give a fuck. It doesn't register. I only care about what and who I care about. And whether what you do affects us. That's just reality.

Don't give me that crap. Libertarians had every opportunity in the world to fight for freedom, and don't. They excuse every tyranny on a state level, and by "company policy". They just don't like federal government. Why do you think that is?

Maybe because federal government is fair?! Even if equally tyrannical. No bribery, knowing a guy who know's a guy, no racial profiling, no bullshit to get you out of it. If one of us gets screwed, we all get screwed. Which motivates everyone to take part in the process to insure that we don't.

It seems awfully suspicious that Christians and libertarians seem so different, yet go about the same method of politics. It's not a coincidence at all. Both rely on controlling their environment. Once people are recognized as one giant community, it's a lot harder to do that. Christians and libertarians need fences, races, sexuality, and other means to separate people from one another. To control, without risking getting controlled themselves.

You lie right to my face with "If it's not harming anybody then it isn't wrong". Shut up. Me posting isn't harming anybody. But forums ban me everyday. What are you going to do about it? Not a God damn thing that's what. Oh... it's okay when they fuck me over, when they rape my CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED RIGHT. Because of "property". Property's fucking magical. Not even "in" the constitution... but magical! And we can never ever tell anyone otherwise! Even when it directly comes in conflict with other liberties, more direct liberties...

Libertarians aren't a joke because they're out of the mainstream. They're a joke because they're out of touch with reality. Reality is not convenient for them and their ayn rand utopia.