[bingookenoo]

"Many proponents of the statist ideology will work hard to see to it that the champions of freedom are denied a candidate in the general election who expresses those viewpoints. As usual, America’s political class will try to limit debate so that only statist viewpoints are widely expressed and only candidates with statist viewpoints are included on the ballot in November. This year is very different. It is possible and likely that Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination and that great contest of ideas will take place. Instead of Americans being forced to choose between two statists of different flavors (“the lesser of two evils”), they will be able to decide between an advocate of statism and an advocate of freedom."

http://www.infowars.com/the-great-de...shape-america/

[mybooboo]

[AntonayPina]

I don't know why anyone bothers debating about something that has zero chance of ever happening.

[Cydayshosse]

I don't know why anyone bothers debating about something that has zero chance of ever happening.

It ain't over until the fat lady sings. She hasn't started singing yet...

[SantaGanstag]

And no... Saaara is not the fat lady I'm referring to.

[jdynwa]

Fukk all the jew stooges! ---- > Ron Paul 2012!!!!

[RussellPG]

Fuck all the neo-con stooges! Ron Paul 2012!!!!

[bridsanaeds]

Vote Ron Paul! Because pork and double-billing first-class flights are the libertarian way!

[IdomeoreTew]

Vote Ron Paul! Because pork and double-billing first-class flights are the libertarian way!

If those allegations are 100% true, it's no different than every other politician. With that being said, he'll never get the nomination and he'll never be president. I think people should focus on solutions that might be effective rather than put hope into the hopeless.

[TheDoctor]

If those allegations are 100% true, it's no different than every other politician. With that being said, he'll never get the nomination and he'll never be president. I think people should focus on solutions that might be effective rather than put hope into the hopeless.

On the pork front, he is different from other Republican politicians. Very different. Most of them have disavowed the practice as wasteful profligate spending and favor currying. Ron Paul rationalizes it.

As for the double-billing, that's at least an ethics violation. Yes, that's different from just about every other politician. It's fraud. He'd better get to the bottom of it, PDQ, or he's going to be remembered as a criminal. Charlie Rangel level? No. But he's supposed to be better than that.

[Wmshyrga]

On the pork front, he is different from other Republican politicians. Very different. Most of them have disavowed the practice as wasteful profligate spending and favor currying. Ron Paul rationalizes it.

As for the double-billing, that's at least an ethics violation. Yes, that's different from just about every other politician. It's fraud. He'd better get to the bottom of it, PDQ, or he's going to be remembered as a criminal. Charlie Rangel level? No. But he's supposed to be better than that.

I strongly suspect most all of them skim in one way or another. Being a professional politician seems to be a great way to get rich. The rest just aren't being scrutinized like Paul. But yes, Paul does seem to be a hypocrite, and I'm not the least bit surprised by it.

[KkJvrG4d]

He's been running interference for romney all through the debates...attacking all and sundry who challenged mcromney for front runner status. Anybody besides me notice that he hasn't uttered a word against romney? My guess is that he's laying the groundwork for rand's future career.
Rand has said he'd be honored to be romney's veep.

[ElectraDupu]

He's been running interference for romney all through the debates...attacking all and sundry who challenged mcromney for front runner status. Anybody besides me notice that he hasn't uttered a word against romney? My guess is that he's laying the groundwork for rand's future career.
Rand has said he'd be honored to be romney's veep.

I stopped wasting my time watching some time ago. I've resigned myself to the fact that we'll end up with another douche bag regardless.

[phenterminediett]

He's been running interference for romney all through the debates...attacking all and sundry who challenged mcromney for front runner status. Anybody besides me notice that he hasn't uttered a word against romney? My guess is that he's laying the groundwork for rand's future career.
Rand has said he'd be honored to be romney's veep.

And oh the rationalization and backtracking that will happen then...

[WrinnaArraple]

http://youtu.be/1fcY78ab4yo
http://youtu.be/uAHnLonxAso
http://youtu.be/QRQJTFh4V2w LONG TALL TEXAN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FIRE THEM ALL.

THE BEST OF THEM ARE EASILY REPLACED WITH BETTER.

[casefexas]

http://forgifs.com/gallery/d/194460-1/OWS-protester-pepper-sprayed-face.gif?

Dude... is it possible you can get rid of that GIF? It's very annoying to view when I am trying to read the page. Thanks in advance.

[mr.videomen]

If those allegations are 100% true, it's no different than every other politician. With that being said, he'll never get the nomination and he'll never be president. I think people should focus on solutions that might be effective rather than put hope into the hopeless.

Well, I have a plan B. And a plan C.

[kuzbaslachek]

And oh the rationalization and backtracking that will happen then...

I've already said I'd vote for . So I'm covered...

Rand would just be a bonus.

Hell, I love as a personality. Seems like somebody I'd like to know. Or work for/with.

[Lvnufcdc]

I've already said I'd vote for . So I'm covered...

Rand would just be a bonus.

Hell, I love as a personality. Seems like somebody I'd like to know. Or work for/with.

I know you'll deal with the whole situation pragmatically. The folks over at the Daily Paul, however... That would be fun to watch.

[Arrectiff]

...That would be fun to watch.

In what way? What is the 'Daily Paul'?