LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-08-2012, 06:46 PM   #1
w3QHxwNb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default 26 Things Non-Paul Voters Are Basically Saying...
(1) The American political establishment has done a super job keeping our country prosperous and our liberties protected, so I’m sure whatever candidate they push on me is probably a good one.

(2) Our country is basically bankrupt. Unfunded entitlement liabilities are in excess of twice world GDP. Therefore, it’s a good idea to vote for someone who offers no specific spending cuts of any kind.

(3) Vague promises to cut spending are good enough for me, even though they have always resulted in higher spending in the past.

(4) I prefer a candidate who plays to the crowd, instead of having the courage to tell his audience things they may not want to hear.

(5) I am deeply concerned about spending. Therefore, I would like to vote for someone who supported Medicare Part D, thereby adding $7 trillion to Medicare’s unfunded liabilities.

(6) I am opposed to bailouts. Therefore, I will vote for a candidate who supported TARP.

(7) The federal government is much too involved in education, where it has no constitutional role. Therefore, I will vote for a candidate who supported expanding the Department of Education and favored the No Child Left Behind Act.

(8) Even though practically everyone was caught by surprise in the 2008 financial crisis, which we are still reeling from, it’s a good idea not to vote for the one man in politics who predicted exactly what was bound to unfold, all the way back in 2001.

(9) I am not impressed by a candidate who inspires people, especially young ones, to read the great economists and political philosophers.

(10) I am concerned about taxes. Therefore, I will not vote for the one candidate who has never supported a tax increase.

(11) I believe it is conservative to support bringing the Enlightenment to Afghanistan.

(12) Even though I lost half my retirement portfolio when the economy crashed from the sugar high the Federal Reserve’s artificially low interest rates put it on, I would like to vote for someone who is not really interested in the Federal Reserve.

(13) Even though 50 years of the embargo on Cuba did nothing to undermine Fidel Castro, and in fact handed him a perfect excuse for all the failures of socialism, I favor continuing this policy.

(14) If someone has a drug problem, prison rape is the best solution I can think of.

(15) Even though the Constitution had to be amended to allow for alcohol prohibition, and even though I claim to care about the Constitution, I don’t mind that there’s no constitutional authorization for the war on drugs, and I will punish at the polls anyone who favors the constitutional solution of returning the issue to the states.

(16) I believe only a “liberal” would think it was inhumane to keep essential items out of Iraq in the 1990s, even though one of the first people to protest this policy was Pat Buchanan.

(17) The Brookings Institution says Newt Gingrich’s 1994 Contract with America was an insignificant nibbling around the edges. I favor people who support insignificant nibbling around the edges, as long as they occasionally trick me with a nice speech.

(18) I am deeply concerned about radical Islam, so it was a good idea to depose the secular Saddam Hussein — who was so despised by Islamists that Osama bin Laden himself offered to fight against him in the 1991 Persian Gulf War — and replace him with a Shiite regime friendly with Iran, while also bringing about a new Iraqi constitution that makes Islam the state religion and forbids any law that contradicts its teachings.

(19) Indefinite detention for U.S. citizens seems like nothing to be worried about, especially since our political class is so trustworthy that it could never abuse such a power.

(20) Following up on (19), I believe Thomas Jefferson was just being paranoid when he said, “In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”

(21) Even though the war in Iraq was based on crude propaganda I would have laughed at if the Soviet Union had peddled it, and even though the result has been hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis, four million people displaced, trillions of dollars down the drain, tens of thousands of serious injuries among American servicemen and an epidemic of suicide throughout the military, not to mention the ruination of America’s reputation in the world, I see no reason to be skeptical when the same people who peddled that fiasco urge me to support yet another war as my country is going bankrupt.

(22) I do not trust the media. But when the media tells me I am not to support Ron Paul, who says things he is not allowed to say, I will comply.

(23) I know the media will smear or marginalize anyone who would really fix this country. But when the media smears and marginalizes Ron Paul, I will draw no conclusion from this.

(24) I want to be spoken to like this: “My fellow Americans, you are the awesomest of the awesome, and the only reason anyone in the world might be unhappy with your government is because of your sheer awesomeness.”

(25) I think it’s a good idea to vote for Mitt , whose top three donors are Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Morgan Stanley, and a bad idea to vote for Ron Paul, whose top three donors are the U.S. Army, the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Air Force.

(26) I have not been exploited enough by the cozy relationship between large financial firms and the U.S. government, and I would like to see it continue.

http://www.bastiatinstitute.org/2012...ically-saying/

My favorite two of the 26:

(22) I do not trust the media. But when the media tells me I am not to support Ron Paul, who says things he is not allowed to say (and because "he can't win"), I will comply.

(23) I know the media will smear or marginalize anyone who would really fix this country. But when the media smears and marginalizes Ron Paul, I will draw no conclusion from this.
w3QHxwNb is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 06:59 PM   #2
Evoncalabbalo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
Nice post, but Paul cannot win, you are wasting your time.

give him a major speech at the convention and let him influence the party platform. beyond that you are dreaming.
Evoncalabbalo is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 07:04 PM   #3
TeksPaisimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Nice post, but Paul cannot win, you are wasting your time.

give him a major speech at the convention and let him influence the party platform. beyond that you are dreaming.
You think Ron Paul would speak at Obama 2nd term inauguration?

That would be Interesting. I'd watch it.
TeksPaisimi is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 07:48 PM   #4
Hokimjers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
27.. "I hate the US Constitution"
Hokimjers is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 07:49 PM   #5
Zvmwissq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
27.. "I hate the US Constitution"
LOL!
Zvmwissq is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 07:53 PM   #6
JohnVK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
I'm for Paul but I am against his policies on drugs. What does that make me?
JohnVK is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 07:54 PM   #7
cwgwowcom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
I'm for Paul but I am against his policies on drugs. What does that make me?
Naive?
cwgwowcom is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:04 PM   #8
parurorges

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
Naive?
No, I agree with just about everything he says, EXCEPT the drug thing. I believe drug use would go down if our economy is thriving. And the only way for that to happen is by taking Paul's approach with economics. So as much as I disagree with Paul on his drug policies, I'd take him over Obama or the neo-con phonies the news channels shove down viewers' throats every day.
parurorges is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:08 PM   #9
Rx-Ultram

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Sorry to hear that!
Me too.. We won't be well served with so many Republicans at odds with our founding document.
Rx-Ultram is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:12 PM   #10
golfmenorca

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
I know a lot of people who aren't voting for Ron Paul and who wouldn't vote for him - myself included. I don't know anyone who says any of those things.
golfmenorca is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:14 PM   #11
Narkeere

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
I think it’s a good idea to vote for Mitt , whose top three donors are Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Morgan Stanley, and a bad idea to vote for Ron Paul, whose top three donors are the U.S. Army, the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Air Force.



Goldman Sachs, etc. don't donate. The people who donate happen to work for them. I know people who work for all 3 groups and support , and have made donations to him. They are successful, but they work hard. I don't have anything against people who get rich.
Narkeere is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:15 PM   #12
EnvellFen

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
I don't know anyone who says any of those things.
You need to get out more.
EnvellFen is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:15 PM   #13
Hervams

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
I know a lot of people who aren't voting for Ron Paul and who wouldn't vote for him - myself included. I don't know anyone who says any of those things.
to the paulistas, anyone who does not give blind worshipful support to their hero is a traitor, a fraud, a liberal, and a closet obamabot.

I don't know what it is with the paul worshipers. Yes, some of his message is right on, but some of it is pure lunacy.

I am also amazed that young people would support a senile old codger who is older than their grandparents.

Politics makes strange bedfellows.
Hervams is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:17 PM   #14
cafeviahe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
You need to get out more.
I get out a lot, Bum. I have a ton of friends very active and interested in politics, and some very strong supporters. Never heard any of them say any of those things.
cafeviahe is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:17 PM   #15
buIf6yoW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
He isn't fucking senile. Fucking A Rocat...


You're starting to piss me off with this shit.
buIf6yoW is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:19 PM   #16
Thorwaywhobia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
493
Senior Member
Default
I get out a lot, Bum. I have a ton of friends very active and interested in politics, and some very strong supporters. Never heard any of them say any of those things.
in the mold of the obama machine, the paul supporters have decided to demonize anyone who disagrees with them.
Thorwaywhobia is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:19 PM   #17
7kitthuptarill

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
to the paulistas, anyone who does not give blind worshipful support to their hero is a traitor, a fraud, a liberal, and a closet obamabot.

I don't know what it is with the paul worshipers. Yes, some of his message is right on, but some of it is pure lunacy.

I am also amazed that young people would support a senile old codger who is older than their grandparents.

Politics makes strange bedfellows.
It's the youth that surprise me too. You'd think they would gravitate away from someone so elderly who babbles so much.

In 2008 the big knock on McCain was his age. Paul is older than McCain was. They're both too old to be President.

I like a lot of what he says. I like a lot of what Newt says, and Santorum, and my next door neighbor and Sean Hannity and Joe the Plumber, too. That doesn't mean I should vote for any of them for POTUS>
7kitthuptarill is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:20 PM   #18
tLO0hFNy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
He isn't fucking senile. Fucking A Rocat...
how do you know? some of his off-topic rants certainly have the look of senility. fucking A NBB
tLO0hFNy is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:21 PM   #19
FalHaitle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
It's the youth that surprise me too. You'd think they would gravitate away from someone so elderly who babbles so much.

In 2008 the big knock on McCain was his age. Paul is older than McCain was. They're both too old to be President.

I like a lot of what he says. I like a lot of what Newt says, and Santorum, and my next door neighbor and Sean Hannity and Joe the Plumber, too. That doesn't mean I should vote for any of them for POTUS>
FalHaitle is offline


Old 02-08-2012, 08:23 PM   #20
kesFockplek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
642
Senior Member
Default
(23) I know the media will smear or marginalize anyone who would really fix this country. But when the media smears and marginalizes Ron Paul, I will draw no conclusion from this.

The media smears and marginalizes Mitt a whole lot more than Ron Paul. That's because they fear as Obama's biggest threat.
kesFockplek is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:18 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity