LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-29-2012, 05:12 AM   #1
topcasinobonua

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default Axelrod: Mitt Gave Eloquent Defense Of ObamaCare
Following Thursday night’s Republican debate-turned-brawl in Florida, Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren read a tweet from President Obama’s right-hand-man, David Axelrod:


Source: Breitbart

----------------------------------------

I've just read several articles suggesting may fall flat on his face if he tries to make ObamaCare an issue against Obama.

These quotes from that debate keep popping up:

“First of all, it's not worth getting angry about,” said, responding to Santorum’s obvious frustrations about Care.

With Santorum's response, “Folks, we can't give this issue away in this election. It is about fundamental freedom.”

Maybe McCain's endorsement of was symbolic of what we could expect should the Ken Doll get the nomination.
A roll-over for Obama.
topcasinobonua is offline


Old 01-29-2012, 05:40 AM   #2
inofindy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
will have trouble for sure.

It isn't going to play well as soon as he starts to utter "Well, a state has the right to".
and finishes with "but on the Federal level its unacceptable".

This whole argument he is throwing out on care/0bamacare, should leave voters scratching their heads in disbelief...
Its good for Massachusetts but bad for America...

Um how does that work...?
inofindy is offline


Old 01-29-2012, 06:09 AM   #3
Caursedus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
BLOW IT OUT YOUR HOLE,
ASSELROD.
Caursedus is offline


Old 01-29-2012, 06:09 AM   #4
Attaniuri

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
555
Senior Member
Default
FUCK THAT GOD-DAMNED

ROMNEY!
Attaniuri is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 03:06 PM   #5
nuabuncarnigo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
will have trouble for sure.

It isn't going to play well as soon as he starts to utter "Well, a state has the right to".
and finishes with "but on the Federal level its unacceptable".

This whole argument he is throwing out on care/0bamacare, should leave voters scratching their heads in disbelief...
Its good for Massachusetts but bad for America...

Um how does that work...?
A good conservative believes that states should have more power and be more in control of spending. Ron Paul believes almost everything should go back to the states. That's exactly what did - create a program for the state he was Governor of. What's wrong with that? I would think any Paul supporter, or real conservative, would embrace what he did. If you don't live in Massachusetts, it wouldn't impact you at all, would it?
nuabuncarnigo is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 03:27 PM   #6
irrehoobe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
FUCK THAT COMMUNIST INSURANCE PIMP.

FUCK HIM UP HIS ASS WITH A FLAMING

FORTY-FOOT FIR TREE.


irrehoobe is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 03:28 PM   #7
texprofi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
556
Senior Member
Default
IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN ALL FIFTY STATES.
texprofi is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 09:54 PM   #8
Erawise

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
A good conservative believes that states should have more power and be more in control of spending. Ron Paul believes almost everything should go back to the states. That's exactly what did - create a program for the state he was Governor of. What's wrong with that? I would think any Paul supporter, or real conservative, would embrace what he did. If you don't live in Massachusetts, it wouldn't impact you at all, would it?
It goes back to some of the same issues...

Mandated health coverage.
Health care for all uninsured , paid for by a government, via taxpayers.
Most Small businesses are required to cover employees.

Its socialist in nature and dictatorial in application.
shouldn't have , but he did... He isn't a conservative.

But he keeps defending it...
Which leads some of us to believe, he might only tweak 0bamacare, despite what he is saying.
Erawise is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 10:01 PM   #9
quack!

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
It goes back to some of the same issues...

Mandated health coverage.
Health care for all uninsured , paid for by a government, via taxpayers.
Most Small businesses are required to cover employees.

Its socialist in nature and dictatorial in application.
shouldn't have , but he did... He isn't a conservative.

But he keeps defending it...
Which leads some of us to believe, he might only tweak 0bamacare, despite what he is saying.
Agree. I don't think has any intention of repealing obamacare.
quack! is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:20 PM   #10
Essefsbyday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
It goes back to some of the same issues...

Mandated health coverage.
Health care for all uninsured , paid for by a government, via taxpayers.
Most Small businesses are required to cover employees.

Its socialist in nature and dictatorial in application.
shouldn't have , but he did... He isn't a conservative.

But he keeps defending it...
Which leads some of us to believe, he might only tweak 0bamacare, despite what he is saying.
Spliff, just curious - how will Newt Gingrich repeal it? With a simple stroke of a pen? Newt was all for a national mandate - you do know that, right? And a decade before did it in MA, too.

did it in MA, and nowhere else. If conservatives say states should have their own programs of this type (dictatrorial in application? you do know it looked nothing like his original plan by the time the legislature in MA got their hands on it, yes?), why would any conservative presume to comment on what a state imposes on itself, not impacting those of us who don't live there in any way?
Essefsbyday is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:21 PM   #11
DoctoNilsonDen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Agree. I don't think has any intention of repealing obamacare.
Who is going to fully repeal it, and how exactly will it be accomplished?
DoctoNilsonDen is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:32 PM   #12
Lafclaria

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
A good conservative believes that states should have more power and be more in control of spending. Ron Paul believes almost everything should go back to the states. That's exactly what did - create a program for the state he was Governor of. What's wrong with that? I would think any Paul supporter, or real conservative, would embrace what he did. If you don't live in Massachusetts, it wouldn't impact you at all, would it?
The paulistas rant about states rights and then complain about a clear case of a state making a decision for itself. They are as hypocritical as the dem/libs on this issue.
Lafclaria is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:33 PM   #13
AOE6q4bu

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
The paulistas rant about states rights and then complain about a clear case of a state making a decision for itself. They are as hypocritical as the dem/libs on this issue.
That's exactly the point I'm trying to make. You got it.
AOE6q4bu is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:33 PM   #14
drugsprevi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
Who is going to fully repeal it, and how exactly will it be accomplished?
congress could repeal it. If the SCOTUS rules the mandate portion unconstitutional, it will effectively be repealed by that action. It is terrible legislation and must be overturned.
drugsprevi is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:34 PM   #15
MizzDaizzy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
congress could repeal it. If the SCOTUS rules the mandate portion unconstitutional, it will effectively be repealed by that action. It is terrible legislation and must be overturned.
Can Newt Gingrich repeal it with a stroke of a pen?
MizzDaizzy is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:41 PM   #16
MasTaBlau

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
Can Newt Gingrich repeal it with a stroke of a pen?
No president could do that.
MasTaBlau is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:45 PM   #17
Alex Photographer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
No president could do that.
Exactly. Again my point.

If Congress is hell bent on repealing Obamacare, can't stop them, even if he wanted to stop them - and there's no indication that he would stop them. If Paul attempts to repeal it without Congress' approval, they will stop him dead in his tracks.
Alex Photographer is offline


Old 01-30-2012, 11:51 PM   #18
MaigicyuNinia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
Exactly. Again my point.

If Congress is hell bent on repealing Obamacare, can't stop them, even if he wanted to stop them - and there's no indication that he would stop them. If Paul attempts to repeal it without Congress' approval, they will stop him dead in his tracks.
Paul would be "pissing into the wind" if he tried to do it on his own-----excuse the expression.
MaigicyuNinia is offline


Old 01-31-2012, 12:59 AM   #19
mitiaycatq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
367
Senior Member
Default
Axlerod knows about healthcare. When Michelle Obama had her make work job at the University of Chicago Hospital he helped her engage in patient dumping. Seems they did not want the great unwashed in "their" hospital when they could be shipped to other hospitals thus making room for those with money.

Makes a person wonder what we are going to get under Obamacare.
mitiaycatq is offline


Old 01-31-2012, 01:54 AM   #20
spapsinee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default


http://youtu.be/bISFuXFId78
http://youtu.be/BjDHW3p35_w

http://youtu.be/bYOGxXgJtto
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FIRE THIS SHIT-FOR-BRAINS CONGRESS.
spapsinee is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity