Tonight’s Iowa Vote Count To Take Place At Secret Location - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Poll Pitt** · 01-03-2012, 08:06 PM

"Tonight’s final vote tally for the Iowa caucuses will take place at a secret undisclosed location, an announcement that has stoked fears of vote fraud amongst Ron Paul supporters, concerns that were heightened following a Republican insider’s claim that the GOP establishment will not allow Paul to win.

The final Iowa vote count normally takes place at state party headquarters in Des Moines, but following dubious “security concerns” about Occupy protesters disrupting the tabulation process, the Republican Party of Iowa announced that it would be moving the final vote count to a secret undisclosed location."

http://www.infowars.com/tonights-iow...cret-location/

**viagsjicguara** · 01-03-2012, 08:06 PM

Are you fucking kidding me?!?!?

**eXC3Kvnn** · 01-03-2012, 08:07 PM

You sound like Gore. " If I lose someone had to cheat"

**sjdflghd** · 01-03-2012, 08:10 PM

Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"...

Unreal...

**clomoll** · 01-03-2012, 08:11 PM

Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"...

Unreal...

"if I lose someone had to cheat"

**DoctorWeryDolt** · 01-03-2012, 08:12 PM

Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"...

Unreal...

He is not leading the polls. he is second or third

**netamargr** · 01-03-2012, 08:12 PM

"if I lose someone had to cheat"

"security"

**ardsdelinq** · 01-03-2012, 08:13 PM

He is not leading the polls. he is second or third

1st

**wvbwxol** · 01-03-2012, 08:16 PM

1st

not the polls I have seen.

**yharmon6614** · 01-03-2012, 08:17 PM

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-1588.html

**oB8LI2kP** · 01-03-2012, 08:18 PM

"security"

why shouldn't votes be counted in a secure environment?

**CDCL7WKJ** · 01-03-2012, 08:19 PM

why shouldn't votes be counted in a secure environment?

Why shouldn't they be counted the same way they've always been counted before?

**chootsonege** · 01-03-2012, 08:20 PM

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-1588.html

Every single poll is a statistical tie within the margin of error.

**Goalseexere** · 01-03-2012, 08:23 PM

Every single poll is a statistical tie within the margin of error.

RP is tied for 2nd with Santorum. not first as you claimed earlier.

**Biashpainabix** · 01-03-2012, 08:23 PM

Why shouldn't they be counted the same way they've always been counted before?

maybe there was voter fraud in the past.

**feseEscaple** · 01-03-2012, 08:34 PM

RP is tied for 2nd with Santorum. not first as you claimed earlier.

Incorrect.

Do you think I somehow can't see the polls in your link?!?!?

WTF?!??

**Soolfelpecelf** · 01-03-2012, 08:36 PM

Are you fucking kidding me?!?!?

You act surprised Jeshu............

**Sadsidioribre** · 01-03-2012, 08:39 PM

Secure and secret are two different things. Retards.

We have to hide the count because there might be protestors? Faggots!
The militarized police can't handle these imaginary hippie protestors who don't even exist?
Threat level five! Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!

Scam.

Repukes are Red
Demfucks are Blue
Pulling their strings
Is the international jew

**RooxiaNof** · 01-03-2012, 08:41 PM

Secure and secret are two different things. Retards.

We have to hide the count because there might be protestors? Faggots!
The militarized police can't handle these imaginary hippie protestors who don't even exist?
Threat level five! Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!

Scam.

Repukes are Red
Demfucks are Blue
Pulling their strings
Is the international jew

**leoto5Fm** · 01-03-2012, 08:44 PM

Incorrect.

Do you think I somehow can't see the polls in your link?!?!?

WTF?!??

right, my mistake. within the margin of error he could be 1st or 3rd.

01-03-2012, 08:06 PM	#1
Poll Pitt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 505 Senior Member	Tonight’s Iowa Vote Count To Take Place At Secret Location "Tonight’s final vote tally for the Iowa caucuses will take place at a secret undisclosed location, an announcement that has stoked fears of vote fraud amongst Ron Paul supporters, concerns that were heightened following a Republican insider’s claim that the GOP establishment will not allow Paul to win. The final Iowa vote count normally takes place at state party headquarters in Des Moines, but following dubious “security concerns” about Occupy protesters disrupting the tabulation process, the Republican Party of Iowa announced that it would be moving the final vote count to a secret undisclosed location." http://www.infowars.com/tonights-iow...cret-location/ Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:06 PM	#2
viagsjicguara Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	Are you fucking kidding me?!?!? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:07 PM	#3
eXC3Kvnn Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	You sound like Gore. " If I lose someone had to cheat" Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:10 PM	#4
sjdflghd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"... Unreal... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:11 PM	#5
clomoll Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 420 Senior Member	Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"... Unreal... "if I lose someone had to cheat" Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:12 PM	#6
DoctorWeryDolt Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 373 Senior Member	Paul leads in the polls, and all of a sudden there are "security concerns"... Unreal... He is not leading the polls. he is second or third Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:12 PM	#7
netamargr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	"if I lose someone had to cheat" "security" Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:13 PM	#8
ardsdelinq Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 392 Senior Member	He is not leading the polls. he is second or third 1st Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:16 PM	#9
wvbwxol Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 426 Senior Member	1st not the polls I have seen. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:17 PM	#10
yharmon6614 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 387 Senior Member	http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-1588.html Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:18 PM	#11
oB8LI2kP Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 407 Senior Member	"security" why shouldn't votes be counted in a secure environment? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:19 PM	#12
CDCL7WKJ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 472 Senior Member	why shouldn't votes be counted in a secure environment? Why shouldn't they be counted the same way they've always been counted before? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:20 PM	#13
chootsonege Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...mary-1588.html Every single poll is a statistical tie within the margin of error. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:23 PM	#14
Goalseexere Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 598 Senior Member	Every single poll is a statistical tie within the margin of error. RP is tied for 2nd with Santorum. not first as you claimed earlier. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:23 PM	#15
Biashpainabix Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 376 Senior Member	Why shouldn't they be counted the same way they've always been counted before? maybe there was voter fraud in the past. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

01-03-2012, 08:34 PM	#16
feseEscaple Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 464 Senior Member	RP is tied for 2nd with Santorum. not first as you claimed earlier. Incorrect. Do you think I somehow can't see the polls in your link?!?!? WTF?!?? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:36 PM	#17
Soolfelpecelf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 509 Senior Member	Are you fucking kidding me?!?!? You act surprised Jeshu............ Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:39 PM	#18
Sadsidioribre Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 460 Senior Member	Secure and secret are two different things. Retards. We have to hide the count because there might be protestors? Faggots! The militarized police can't handle these imaginary hippie protestors who don't even exist? Threat level five! Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Scam. Repukes are Red Demfucks are Blue Pulling their strings Is the international jew Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:41 PM	#19
RooxiaNof Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 552 Senior Member	Secure and secret are two different things. Retards. We have to hide the count because there might be protestors? Faggots! The militarized police can't handle these imaginary hippie protestors who don't even exist? Threat level five! Danger, Will Robinson, Danger! Scam. Repukes are Red Demfucks are Blue Pulling their strings Is the international jew Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

01-03-2012, 08:44 PM	#20
leoto5Fm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 434 Senior Member	Incorrect. Do you think I somehow can't see the polls in your link?!?!? WTF?!?? right, my mistake. within the margin of error he could be 1st or 3rd. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote