LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-02-2012, 09:29 PM   #1
LarryG1978

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default Rick Santorium was voted in 2006 one of the 3 most corrupt Senators in 2006
Nothing new here really, Santorum is just another shitbag politician in DC.

CREW Releases Second Annual Most Corrupt Members of Congress Report

Washington, DC – Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) released its second annual report on the most corrupt members of Congress entitled Beyond DeLay: The 20 Most Corrupt Members of Congress (and five to watch). This encyclopedic report on corruption in the 109th Congress documents the egregious, unethical and possibly illegal activities of the most tainted members of Congress. CREW has compiled the members’ transgressions and analyzed them in light of federal laws and congressional rules.
Two members have been removed from last year’s list of 13. Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-CA) is now serving an eight-year jail term for bribery and Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) has agreed to plead guilty to crimes that will likely result in a minimum two-year prison term.
CREW has also re-launched the report’s tandem website, www.beyonddelay.org. The site offers short summaries of each member’s transgressions as well as the full-length profiles and all accompanying exhibits.

CREW’s Most Corrupt Members of Congress:

Members of the Senate:
Conrad Burns (R-MT)
Bill Frist (R-TN)
Rick Santorum (R-PA)

Members of the House:
Alan Mollohan (D-WV)
Roy Blunt (R-MO)
Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO)
Ken Calvert (R-CA)
Richard Pombo (R-CA)
John Doolittle (R-CA)
Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
Tom Feeney (R-FL)
Pete Sessions (R-TX)
Katherine Harris (R-FL)
John Sweeney (R-NY)
William Jefferson (D-LA)
Charles Taylor (R-NC)
Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
Maxine Waters (D-CA)
Gary Miller (R-CA)
Curt Weldon (R-PA)
Five Members to Watch:
Chris Cannon (R-UT)
J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ)
Dennis Hastert (R-IL)
John Murtha (D-PA)
Don Sherwood (R-PA)
“CREW created this exhaustive go-to guide on corruption in Congress to expose and hold accountable those members of Congress who believe they are above the law,” Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW said today. “The officials named in this report have chosen to enrich themselves and their families and friends by abusing the power of their office, rather than work for the public good. Their collective corruption affects all Americans.” http://www.citizensforethics.org/ind...ngress-report/
LarryG1978 is offline


Old 01-02-2012, 09:57 PM   #2
dosyrotsbop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Seems like it mostly involves which house he lived in at the time in VA and how his kids were educated and who paid for it.
I was curious how Barney Frank escaped the Senate list of most corrupt until I checked out Discover The Network's page on CREW (CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON):
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7309

I'm indifferent to Santorum, neither for nor against.
His saber rattling has me concerned, besides that he does have some good ideas.
And he just doesn't come across as dishonest to me.
Does he 'work the system' some in DC? Perhaps.
It's one of the reasons why the Congress has a low approval rating.
Most of them do.
dosyrotsbop is offline


Old 01-02-2012, 09:59 PM   #3
nryFBa9i

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
I got no problem with that statement, if you also add in that the Neo Conservatives are really liberals, ex Troskyite's aka Marxist.


nryFBa9i is offline


Old 01-02-2012, 10:59 PM   #4
opergolon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Citing an opinion poll from a socialist hatchet group. That's the best you can do?
opergolon is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 12:14 AM   #5
Anteneprorid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
I don't know if he's corrupt, but he's not very conservative. He's very socially conservative, in the vein of GWB.

"Compassionate Conservative".
Anteneprorid is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 12:18 AM   #6
andrekuper

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default
No Pelosi. No Reid. No Hillary. No Barney Fag. Murtha only on the watch list.

Not a comprehensive list by any means. And Santorum doesn't stand a chance anyway. So what's the point?
andrekuper is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 12:28 AM   #7
MondayBlues

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
No Pelosi. No Reid. No Hillary. No Barney Fag. Murtha only on the watch list.

Not a comprehensive list by any means. And Santorum doesn't stand a chance anyway. So what's the point?
Of course he stands a chance. Anyone in the race has a chance. There has yet to be a single vote cast.
MondayBlues is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 12:36 AM   #8
Snocioncilm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Of course he stands a chance. Anyone in the race has a chance. There has yet to be a single vote cast.
Reality check, please.
Snocioncilm is offline


Old 01-03-2012, 12:45 AM   #9
Vapepreab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
549
Senior Member
Default
Reality check, please.
Reagan had "no chance". That's reality.
Vapepreab is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity