Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Wouldn't stop them from supplying a nuke to someone who'd do it. Ever think of that? |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
If you're referring to Israel ( shock), they seem to do a rather good job at controlling their use of nukes. None used in 40 plus years is a pretty good track record. Better than we can claim. Do you really believe Ahmadinejad will show equal restraint? Give a few to the Saudis. They hate Iran more than Israel does. They can solve the problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
They'd be held culpable, regardless. N Korea could sell a nuke to some madman and the UN would just scold them. No punishment at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
If Iran gets a nuke. they could give it to some terrorist group. that group could smuggle it in to NY harbor and blow up most of NYC. Or they could bring it in through mexico and blow up LA. There would be no clear trail to Iran. So who would we retaliate against? Paul will not make that any better. He'll be hiding under his desk with his musket waiting for the enemy to arrive. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
If Iran gets a nuke. they could give it to some terrorist group. that group could smuggle it in to NY harbor and blow up most of NYC. Or they could bring it in through mexico and blow up LA. There would be no clear trail to Iran. So who would we retaliate against? |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
That would defeat the whole purpose of getting the nuke in the first place. The nuke is a deterrent. It protects you from invasion. If you give it away, you've lost your bargaining chip. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
If a beligerant, nuclear Israel weren't making the case for a nuclear deterrant of their own.. I doubt we'd have problems with Iran. Evil does not just disipate. Some countries in this world just suck and we have to deal with them. It's not our fault they suck, despite what Paul claims. Their leadership is demented and need to be beaten down. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
However, face with a lopsided US foreign policy and a lingering, oft stated desire.. and following an actual attempt, to turn them into a proxy state.. Why WOULDN'T they want a fucking nuke?
Have you people lost your fucking minds? We've created a situation where they need a weapon for self defense.. Their greivances are completely legitimate. With the help of our allies, we've CREATED this problem. What in the fuck is the matter with you? And what do we do after a strike? We can't invade and hold Iran.. Do we just bomb them every two weeks till the end of time? Hoping in vain that they don't develop a nuke offshore or take the project underground? What would our actions tell the rest of the world about the necessity of nuke arms? You'd have to be out of your mind to sign the NNPT after a stunt like that.. What will it to do drive nations into the arms of our enemies? Do you people realize this isn't a fucking video game? |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
Iran would simply shift their focus......to someone else.....like us..... Why not Russia, China or India? Evil does not just disipate. Some countries in this world just suck and we have to deal with them. It's not our fault they suck, despite what Paul claims. Their leadership is demented and need to be beaten down. Annnnnd, we're just going to do this all by our lonesome? Right? Because there's a military solution for everything that ails us? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|