[wheettebott]

FUCK THE CRAVEN CROOKS....


WHO WHINE AS IF THEY HAD NO POWER OR DUTY TO REFUSE A


BRIBE....

....AS IF THEY LACKED THE INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION

TO RECOGNIZE A BRIBE... WHETHER OVERT OR SUBTLE.


WHAT SHIT!!!!!!!!

[Goseciwx]

So far as corporations go, Mossfern.. You said your husband is a retailer.

Say he retails something that was misused, and resulted in a death or injury.. and he was sued. (Because attorneys sue anyone and everyone involved.. looking for money)

And let's say a sympathetic jury ruled against him. (Because this happens..)

Now, he cal lose his small corporation.. and all the business assets. But, without the corporate veil, you could lose your assets too. Your house. Everything you have or will ever have.

It's possible.. Perhaps not likely, but it could certainly happen.

Now imagine if he did a more dangerous sort of work.. Like construction, for example. Or manufacturing..

The liability goes up and up. There's insurance, that is true.. But, as we are constantly reminded, liability is a bottomless pit.

The more personal risk he is placed at through no fault of his own, the more he will have to charge his customers. The more of a disadvantage he will be in against larger businesses.

[JeffStewart]

"And (BERNIE'S SHIT) won't help.. As there's infinite ways to compensate a crony.. You don't have to write them a check and call it a campaign donation.

What really needs to happen is to suck the power out of DC and send it back to the states where it belongs.. Then nobody will send them a dime..."


AMEN TO THAT.


BERNIE IS WORKING TO EXPAND THE TYRANNY AND FACILITATE GRAFT.... ALL WITH THE NOBLE-EST OF

INTENTIONS, OF COURSE.... ALL IN THE FURTHERANCE OF THE SACRED SOCIALIST PRECEPT THAT THE

PERSON WHO EARNS THE MONEY SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO BENEFIT FROM IT.

[Escamsrasiush]

BERNIE & HIS PALS WOULD LIKE TO NATIONALIZE ALL BUSINESS...


UNBRIDLED LIABILITY AND UNLIMITED COURTHOUSE LOTTERY COULD DO IT, TOO.

[zlZ95pjt]

Sure.. you can do anything from pointing more union money at them.. to buying a million copies of a book.. To a check in a bank account in the caymans.. to a stock tip.. to anything else.
This won't end the practice of money changing hands.. Cause there's too many ways to accomplish that.

[ViagraPriceBuying]

I THINK INSURORS HAVE BECOME CO-CONSPIRATORS IN THE LIABILTY LOTTERY.

[FreeOEMcheapestPHOTOSHOP]

WASHINGTON HAS DECAYED INTO LITTLE MORE THAN AN UNREGULATED

VERSION OF LAS VEGAS.... EXCEPT THAT EVERYONE IS COMPELLED TO PLAY

THE TABLES.

[ligeplodore]

Why do you think the Clinton's have an account in the Caymans?

The convenient location?

[Dominick Yo]

GRAFT IS DOWNRIGHT MAGICAL.

IT HAS BEEN KNOWN TO TURN FROZEN FOOD

INTO BUNDLES OF CASH!

[Sttim]

It doesn't matter which side of the aisle you're on. You know this is true.

http://sanders.senate.gov/petition/?...4-ec2c39342c6c

Not at all.

Trying to stop 'corp's'.........I hear it all the time.

Yet big unions are meddling much more than generic corporations.

Trying to ban/blame corporations, is just a means to allow more free reign to unions, and federal labor groups.

Nothing more.

[Elitiachirl]

You pay me to study shrimp on a treadmill, and I put a nice big check in your account in the caymans..

It's a win/win.

Also, can you regulate my product some more? My small competitors can't afford the cost of compliance.

thx.

[xsVfF9Em]

I THINK INSURORS HAVE BECOME CO-CONSPIRATORS IN THE LIABILTY LOTTERY.

I agree with that.

[erelvenewmeva]

Not at all.

Trying to stop 'corp's'.........I hear it all the time.

Yet big unions are meddling much more than generic corporations.

Trying to ban/blame corporations, is just a means to allow more free reign to unions, and federal labor groups.

Nothing more.

Unions shouldn't have influence of that scale either.
We need politicians with backbone...and brains.

[drugimpotence]

Here it is, let's discuss the specifics and not rely on rhetoric. Hoff, corporations are set up to limit personal liability in the first place - am I wrong?

JEN11E13 S.L.C.
112TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION S. J. RES. ll

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to expressly
exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons
by the Constitution of the United States, prohibit corporate spending
in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the States
to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election
contributions and expenditures.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
llllllllll
Mr. SANDERS (for himself and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following joint
resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
llllllllll
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United
States to expressly exclude for-profit corporations from
the rights given to natural persons by the Constitution
of the United States, prohibit corporate spending in all
elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the
States to regulate corporations and to regulate and set
limits on all election contributions and expenditures.
1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3
thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4
lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con2
JEN11E13 S.L.C.

1 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all
2 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
3 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
4 States within seven years after the date of its submission
5 for ratification:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—
7 ‘‘SECTION 1. The rights protected by the Constitution
8 of the United States are the rights of natural persons and
9 do not extend to for-profit corporations, limited liability
10 companies, or other private entities established for busi11
ness purposes or to promote business interests under the
12 laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state.
13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Such corporate and other private enti14
ties established under law are subject to regulation by the
15 people through the legislative process so long as such regu16
lations are consistent with the powers of Congress and the
17 States and do not limit the freedom of the press.
18 ‘‘SECTION 3. Such corporate and other private enti19
ties shall be prohibited from making contributions or ex20
penditures in any election of any candidate for public of21
fice or the vote upon any ballot measure submitted to the
22 people.
23 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress and the States shall have the
24 power to regulate and set limits on all election contribu25
tions and expenditures, including a candidate’s own spend3
JEN11E13 S.L.C.
1 ing, and to authorize the establishment of political com2
mittees to receive, spend, and publicly disclose the sources
3 of those contributions and expenditures.’’.

[UpperMan]

corporations are set up to limit personal liability in the first place - am I wrong? That and to attract capital, in the case of large corporations.

It may have tax benefits as well. They can shit production, products and materials around.

[mloversia]

"to expressly
exclude for-profit corporations from the rights given to natural persons
by the Constitution of the United States, prohibit corporate spending
in all elections, and affirm the authority of Congress and the States
to regulate corporations and to regulate and set limits on all election
contributions and expenditures."




....FUCK THAT SHIT RIGHT THERE!!!

[allemnendup]

WAY IN THE BACK, A TINY LITTLE MOUSE WHISPERED... "MEANS OF PRODUCTION?"

[leangarance]

THE CONGRESS WANTS TO FORCE YOU TO PAY FOR THEIR CAMPAIGNS.

...AND THEY WANT TO REGULATE WHO CAN OBTAIN CAMPAIGN FINANCING


...AND WHO THEY CAN OBTAIN IT FROM.


POLITICIANS LOVE THE EFFECT MONEY HAS ON POLITICS.


THEY WORRY ABOUT CONTRARY OPINION, THOUGH.


CONTROLLING THE MONEY IS AN EFFECTIVE WAY

TO CONTROL OPPOSING OPINION.

[RemiVedia]

NEVER, EVER SET THE FOX TO GUARD THE HENHOUSE.

[NerbuitW]

TRUST NO AGENT TO GUARD THE PUBLIC LIBERTY....

IF YOU WOULD KEEP IT, YOU MUST GUARD IT YOURSELF.


DON'T SELL YOUR VOTE.

DON'T TOLERATE PROSTITUTES IN CONGRESS WHO SELL THEIRS.