LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-11-2011, 04:33 PM   #1
LfYaRf1S

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default Jobs bill?
They're projecting that the new "jobs bill" will create 1.9 million (temporary) jobs.

With the $447 billion they are proposing, they could simply write a check for $32,000 to every one of the 14 million people unemployed in this nation. Wouldn't that be more effective? Especially if the left is correct and what we need is more consumer demand?

Read more here:

http://stevenallenblog.blogspot.com/...rithmetic.html
LfYaRf1S is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 04:38 PM   #2
ViagraFeller

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
585
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IT'S CRAP.

IT'S ANOTHER TAX HIKE AND SPENDING BILL.

KILL IT.
ViagraFeller is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 04:42 PM   #3
freeprescriptionplanrrx

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
They're projecting that the new "jobs bill" will create 1.9 million (temporary) jobs.

With the $447 billion they are proposing, they could simply write a check for $32,000 to every one of the 14 million people unemployed in this nation. Wouldn't that be more effective? Especially if the left is correct and what we need is more consumer demand?

Read more here:

http://stevenallenblog.blogspot.com/...rithmetic.html
But if they did that, the special interest groups who own the politicians wouldn't get the money.
freeprescriptionplanrrx is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:07 PM   #4
sykanaxer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I DON'T OWE THEM ANYTHING.

FIRE THE CONGRESS.
sykanaxer is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:14 PM   #5
lalpphilalk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I DON'T OWE THEM ANYTHING.

FIRE THE CONGRESS.
Except the root of the problem, obviously, is that too many rightards have been fired, which is why they're jobless and are so concerned about jobs.

And we will once again have to remind the righards that it is not the job of the federal government to give you a job.

If kleinbok and his ilk are still unemployed, they can't blame Obama; they have no one to blame but themselves and their own lack of marketability.

There rightards need to quit mooching off taxpayers and keeping knocking on every barn door until someone offers to pay them.
lalpphilalk is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:29 PM   #6
Aw1HhC0m

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
///////////////// SAARA\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GO BLOW A CIRCUS PONY, YOU BRAINLESS PARASITE.
Aw1HhC0m is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:29 PM   #7
ImmitsRom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
///////////////// SAARA\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


FUCK THE GOVERNMENT, AND

FUCK YOU, SHIT-SUCKER.
ImmitsRom is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:30 PM   #8
UTHZzJ6f

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
Except the root of the problem, obviously, is that too many rightards have been fired, which is why they're jobless and are so concerned about jobs.

And we will once again have to remind the righards that it is not the job of the federal government to give you a job.

If kleinbok and his ilk are still unemployed, they can't blame Obama; they have no one to blame but themselves and their own lack of marketability.

There rightards need to quit mooching off taxpayers and keeping knocking on every barn door until someone offers to pay them.
Fair enough. Let's cut off all bennies and see what happens. See who riots. Deal?
UTHZzJ6f is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:33 PM   #9
ErnestTU

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
543
Senior Member
Default
Fair enough. Let's cut off all bennies and see what happens. See who riots. Deal?
Sounds fair.

Second.
ErnestTU is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:35 PM   #10
taesrom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
They're projecting that the new "jobs bill" will create 1.9 million (temporary) jobs.

With the $447 billion they are proposing, they could simply write a check for $32,000 to every one of the 14 million people unemployed in this nation. Wouldn't that be more effective? Especially if the left is correct and what we need is more consumer demand?

Read more here:

http://stevenallenblog.blogspot.com/...rithmetic.html
They're absolutely correct.. I'm not endorsing such a plan, but yes.. It would be much more effective as stimulus.

Absolutely, don't even need to see the article.
taesrom is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:38 PM   #11
EnvellFen

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
BUT WASHINGTON HAS NOTHING TO REBATE.

SO ALL THEY CAN DO IS STOP TAKING YET MORE.
EnvellFen is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:39 PM   #12
Dilangos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
464
Senior Member
Default
I DO NOT WANT YET ANOTHER CHINESE RE-FI

LOADED ON MY BACK BY THIS ASSHOLE CONGRESS...

FOR ANY REASON.
Dilangos is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:40 PM   #13
Mmccqrtb

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
365
Senior Member
Default
Well, they're just going to print the money.. But yeah, if "stimulus" is the goal, perhaps they should just hand it out to welfare recipients who will spend it immediately?

I don't think it will work.. But that would provide more stimulus than padding overpaid teachers pockets with it..
Mmccqrtb is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:42 PM   #14
Gulauur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
595
Senior Member
Default
WELFARE TYPES WILL BUY TOBACCO, LOTTO, CIGARETTES,

AND STREET DRUGS. NONE OF THAT SPENDING WILL

BENEFIT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.
Gulauur is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:42 PM   #15
tweriaroats

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
.... AND LEGAL COUNSEL, OF COURSE... FOR DWI/

BUSTS, ETC.
tweriaroats is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:45 PM   #16
unatkot

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
///////////////// SAARA\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


THE GOVERNMENT IS BROKE.

IT HAS NO WEALTH TO DISTRIBUTE.

THERE IS NO INTEREST RATE TO CUT.


THE ONLY POSITIVE AND VALUABLE THING THIS

GOVERNMENT CAN OFFER OUR ECONOMY IS

SERIOUS TAX CUTS AND REGULATORY REFORM, AN END TO

BORROWING, AND THE TERMINATION OF IMMIGRATION.
unatkot is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:47 PM   #17
Flatlytaize

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
WELFARE TYPES WILL BUY TOBACCO, LOTTO, CIGARETTES,

AND STREET DRUGS. NONE OF THAT SPENDING WILL

BENEFIT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.
It'd do as much good as throwing cash anywhere else I think.. All of this shit is just sugar high economics, anyway.
Flatlytaize is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:50 PM   #18
ClapekDodki

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
///////////////// SAARA\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AMERICANS DO NOT HAVE EXTRA CASH FOR THE

GOVERNMENT TO WASTE.


THE CRAP HAS GOT TO STOP.

THE BORROWING AND THE SPENDING.

IT MUST STOP.
ClapekDodki is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:51 PM   #19
Tusanoc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
483
Senior Member
Default
We need structural change.. De-regulation. Tax Reform.. STABILITY..

That's what we need..
Tusanoc is offline


Old 09-11-2011, 05:59 PM   #20
PlayboyAtWork

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
393
Senior Member
Default
BUT WASHINGTON HAS NOTHING TO REBATE.

SO ALL THEY CAN DO IS STOP TAKING YET MORE.
AMEN.
PlayboyAtWork is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity