[noingenah]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

REMEDIATING SAARA'S PERSONAL "GROUND ZERO":

TONS OF SULFA DRUGS... AND A BARKO KNUCKLEBOOM

LOADER TO MUCK OUT THE HOLE... THEN EXTENSIVE

CLEAN-UP AND STEAM-BLASTING... PLUS MONTHS OF

MUCUS REMOVAL WITH PNEUMATIC CHIPPING HAMMERS.....

[VIAGRAENLINOBARATOCAMPRAR]

(smile) Poor saara....the last thing I have is a "bad ass" persona...you just don't like that I not only do not take your shit, I am able to shove your silly game right back up your ass.

Now take the feud to the corener, if you still have the balls for it

You make me laugh though,you stil think your lies make a difference.

As for my earlier post...I as just mocking Dale's false bravado. I am 1 degree away from knowing him personally, and I can tell you from almost first hand, he's a pussy, his wannabe bad ass internet persona not withstanding

[ThomasMannfanny]

I find all of this sickeningly humorous...apparently they aren't "really" worried" about "violent" rhetoric.

Come on Saara, stay on topic.

I'm curious what you think about Communists and Anarchists uniting.

Their talking points are in opposition to each other.

[Ambrakam]

First, show me a protest by a mainstream group, right ior left, and i'll show you extremist kooks passing out flyers in the crowd


Second...Anarchism and Communism have common ancestors and in fact, pristine anarchy is the logical result of a purely Marxist society....Leon Trotsky talked about this at length, and Emma Goldman, Rosa Luxumberg and John Reed, (among others) all identified themselves as both communists and anachists

Anarchism has been variously defined by sources. Most often, the term describes the political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy,[1][2] while others have defined it as opposing authority in the conduct of human relations.[3][4][5][6][7] Anarchists widely disagree on what additional criteria are essential to anarchism. According to The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, "there is no single defining position that all anarchists hold, and those considered anarchists at best share a certain family resemblance."[8]

Communism is a sociopolitical movement that aims for a classless and stateless society structured upon common ownership of the means of production, free access to articles of consumption, and the end of wage labour and private property in the means of production and real estate.[1]
In Marxist theory, communism is a specific stage of historical development that inevitably emerges from the development of the productive forces that leads to a superabundance of material wealth, allowing for distribution based on need and social relations based on freely associated individuals.[2][3] The exact definition of communism varies, and it is often mistakenly, in general political discourse, used interchangeably with socialism; however, Marxist theory contends that socialism is just a transitional stage on the road to communism. Leninists revised this theory by introducing the notion of a vanguard party to lead the proletarian revolution and to hold all political power after the revolution, 'in the name of the workers' and supposedly with worker participation, in a transitional stage between capitalism and socialism.
Communists such as council communists and non-Marxist libertarian communists and anarcho-communist oppose the idea of a vanguard party and a transition stage, and advocate for the construction of full communism to begin immediately upon the abolition of capitalism. There is a very wide range of theories amongst those particular communists in regards to how to build the types of institutions that would replace the various economic engines (such as food distribution, education, and hospitals) as they exist under capitalist systems—or even whether to do so at all. Some of these communists have specific plans for the types of administrative bodies that would replace the current ones, while always qualifying that these bodies would be decentralised and worker-owned, just as they currently are within the activist movements themselves. Others have no concrete set of post-revolutionary blueprints at all, claiming instead that they simply trust that the world's workers and poor will figure out proper modes of distribution and wide-scale production, and also coordination, entirely on their own, without the need for any structured "replacements" for capitalist state-based control.
In the modern lexicon of what many sociologists and political commentators refer to as the "political mainstream", communism is often used to refer to the policies of states run by communist parties, regardless of the practical content of the actual economic system they may preside over. Examples of this include the policies of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam where the economic system incorporates "doi moi", the People's Republic of China where the economic system incorporates "socialist market economy", and the economic system of the Soviet Union which was described as "state capitalist" by some communists who increasingly opposed the post-Stalin era Soviet model as it progressed over the course of the 20th century (e.g. Maoists, Trotskyists and libertarian communists)—and even at one point by Vladimir Lenin himself.[4] I dunno....

[timmybrown]

Rae !!!!!


You are not doubting me and looking that up are you ?????

I did look it up, but I also had to go out and run some errands.

To tell you the truth it's a bit confusing to me. See I admit when I don't understand something.

There is so much information out there that contradicts itself....

[NerbuitW]

I find all of this sickeningly humorous...apparently they aren't "really" worried" about "violent" rhetoric.

Their "violent" rhetoric anyway.

These people have no idea what it is their asking for.

Really.

[sueplydup]

I did look it up, but I also had to go out and run some errands.

To tell you the truth it's a bit confusing to me. See I admit when I don't understand something.

There is so much information out there that contradicts itself....

When you get into this type of esoteric socio/political dogma, it is confusing.

Start with this….the political spectrum is a horse shoe, not a horizontal line

The far RIGHT has more in common with the far LEFT that either dares to admit

That said....marxism and anarchism are indeed the offspring of the same mindset

[MannoFr]

When you get into this type of esoteric socio/political dogma, it is confusing.

Start with this….the political spectrum is a horse shoe, not a horizontal line

The far RIGHT has more in common with the far LEFT that either dares to admit

That said....marxism and anarchism are indeed the offspring of the same mindset

I see 1dumbass is following my posts like a jilted crack whore again....

I wonder if Holder and Obama have been indcted for F&F yet ???



1WiseGuy
View Profile
View Forum Posts
Private Message
View Blog Entries
View Articles
Add as Contact
Senior Member

This message is hidden because 1WiseGuy is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore listView Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, 12:23 PM
1WiseGuy
View Profile
View Forum Posts
Private Message
View Blog Entries
View Articles
Add as Contact
Senior Member

This message is hidden because 1WiseGuy is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list

[RogHammon]

“All you f**king Tea Party Baggers, It’s coming, get ready.” Conservatives will arrive to the fight toting large caliber handguns and Deer Rifles.. The opposition will show up toting Chris Matthews.

[nerohedfrs]

Conservatives will arrive to the fight toting large caliber handguns and Deer Rifles.. The opposition will show up toting Chris Matthews.

No one will "show up" perioid

Americans don't have the stomach for it, save a few isolated whackos

[igs00r]

No one will "show up" perioid

Americans don't have the stomach for it, save a few isolated whackos

Don't kid yourself Saara......You can speak for your fellow liberals in your area, however, you can not speak for the rest of America.

Believe me........people are PISSED OFF.

[RogHammon]

When you get into this type of esoteric socio/political dogma, it is confusing.

Start with this….the political spectrum is a horse shoe, not a horizontal line

The far RIGHT has more in common with the far LEFT that either dares to admit

That said....marxism and anarchism are indeed the offspring of the same mindset

Ok...for the sake of conversation, what exactly do I have in common with a loony lefter?

[jabader]

Ok...for the sake of conversation, what exactly do I have in common with a loony lefter?

They both believe in "human rights"
They both oppose the World monetary fund and international governance
They are both dubious on Zionism
Both advocate violence as a means to an end
Both believe in social injection against opposition
Both are strongly populist
Both tend to index reaction based on dogma
Both identify "dates" of significance
Both identify Icons of significance

The list goes on

[Encannavalf]

She's gone to go look at some blogs to come up with an answer.

Actually she's busy going after GoGo again.......**shakes head**

[appletango]

Actually she's busy going after GoGo again.......**shakes head**

never too busy to answer YOU girlfriend !

see above

^^^^^