LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-21-2011, 12:47 AM   #1
SantaClaus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
704
Senior Member
Default Update: Obama focusing on Romney, TRYING TO BUILD UP PERRY.
This lunacy that is George W. Perry's 'candidacy just keep devolving. My preceding related article showed how Obama is indeed scared of .....but this goes further....showing that OBAMA IS ACTIVELY TRYING TO BUILD UP PERRY.

When will GWP's supporters see their lunacy? When? OBAMA IS STANDING RIGHT BESIDE PERRY SUPPORTERS IN TRYING TO DESTROY MITT. Couldn't be more telling....


That’s why the Democratic National Committee this week tried to build up Perry and knock down by e-mailing a copy of the Sunday Herald’s front page dubbing Perry Mitt’s biggest nightmare.

“What Mitt is Waking Up To,” read the e-mail’s subject line.

Let’s face it, Obama’s chances of winning re-election are slim anyway. He is virtually unelectable in much of the South, Midwest and Mountain West. The only way he keeps the White House is by getting an opponent who could scare off moderate and independent voters. http://www.bostonherald.com/news/col...erry_by_a_hair


Wait for their hurricane force spin....shooting the messenger, etc. It helps to keep exposing the vast IQ deficiency Perry supporters have....
SantaClaus is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 12:56 AM   #2
cxddfrxc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
417
Senior Member
Default
The Obama campaign makes a major mistake if they think that it is in their best interest to widen the field and have more than one frontrunner. If Perry can keep his traction, isn't going anywhere without a fight. Instead of 1 target to freeze and attack, they'll have 2 people out there throwing barbs at each other but throwing major attacks at Obama's shoddy record. They'll have to spend more money and effort to fend off these attacks.

It's funny watching Axlerod fail. He seems to think that it took skill to get Obama elected in 2008 (the fact that he only won by a few percentage points after Bush should scare the hell out of them). Now that Obama is a lamer version of Jimmy Carter, they simply can't afford to have people out there exposing their failures. Putting the spotlight on another person who can articulate those failures? Terrible idea. Seeing as Perry already beat the shit out of an Axlerod strategy, Obama and his team ought to be quite frightened.
cxddfrxc is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 01:02 AM   #3
replicaypu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
The Obama campaign makes a major mistake if they think that it is in their best interest to widen the field and have more than one frontrunner. If Perry can keep his traction, isn't going anywhere without a fight. Instead of 1 target to freeze and attack, they'll have 2 people out there throwing barbs at each other but throwing major attacks at Obama's shoddy record. They'll have to spend more money and effort to fend off these attacks.

It's funny watching Axlerod fail. He seems to think that it took skill to get Obama elected in 2008 (the fact that he only won by a few percentage points after Bush should scare the hell out of them). Now that Obama is a lamer version of Jimmy Carter, they simply can't afford to have people out there exposing their failures. Putting the spotlight on another person who can articulate those failures? Terrible idea. Seeing as Perry already beat the shit out of an Axlerod strategy, Obama and his team ought to be quite frightened.
Dude, no matter how smart you TRY to make yourself look, you're still embarrassing yourself. I let you have your fun, but I've exposed you as another Obama/DNC plant, double agent, etc. We won't let you ruin , our only chance at saving this nation from Obama.

For that reason. I'm gonna keep humiliating you, making you have sore loser meltdowns, etc. I do tho appreciate the sharp contrast between your sub par IQ & mine tho. Others here will see that it takes a pretty good IQ, common sense, etc. to support , George W. Perry.....not so much.

Thanks for being a useful idiot, seriously.
replicaypu is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 01:13 AM   #4
Percocetti

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
497
Senior Member
Default
Dude, no matter how smart you TRY to make yourself look, you're still embarrassing yourself. I let you have your fun, but I've exposed you as another Obama/DNC plant, double agent, etc. We won't let you ruin , our only chance at saving this nation from Obama.

For that reason. I'm gonna keep humiliating you, making you have sore loser meltdowns, etc. I do tho appreciate the sharp contrast between your sub par IQ & mine tho. Others here will see that it takes a pretty good IQ, common sense, etc. to support , George W. Perry.....not so much.

Thanks for being a useful idiot, seriously.
Is this your attempt at wit? Did you even read my post (that you quoted)? Do you even know what you are arguing against? I'll make sure to point to this thread the next time you throw out a lame complaint of "shooting the messenger" when somebody puts you in your place.

Seriously, you're not good at this. If I were higher up in the campaign, I'd call you into my office and have a "come to Jesus" meeting with you. You're not helping his cause.
Percocetti is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 09:33 AM   #5
gunhijala

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
410
Senior Member
Default
BUMP.
gunhijala is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 02:47 PM   #6
nicktender

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
Saaaara's attempt to help nObama win is pretty lame. The more players in the game right now, the better.
nicktender is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:28 PM   #7
Immusaatmonna

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
576
Senior Member
Default
Saaaara's attempt to help nObama win is pretty lame. The more players in the game right now, the better.
.....Dude you gotta start trying to make more sense. I took your troll/troll sock self off iggy cuz I kinda felt bad for you.

If you wanna support Obama through George W. Perry, at least be honest about it.
Immusaatmonna is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:29 PM   #8
Bonioners

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
Presidential candidates for 500, Alex. Ran in 2012 but failed miserably. Who is Mitt ?
Bonioners is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:31 PM   #9
gernica

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
575
Senior Member
Default
Presidential candidates for 500, Alex. Ran in 2012 but failed miserably. Who is Mitt ?
......Yeeea it's obvious your someone's sock too.....
gernica is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:32 PM   #10
tomsmuidh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default
......Yeeea it's obvious your someone's sock too.....
Nobodies sock. I just do not understand why you are on s nuts? He is a liberal.
tomsmuidh is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:34 PM   #11
jessyhalm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
499
Senior Member
Default
Nobodies sock. I just do not understand why you are on s nuts? He is a liberal.
Because he is terrible at learning things for himself. Somebody said to him " good, Perry bad," and he ran with it. "Activists" aren't usually the smartest of people, this is why it is so easy to convince them to go out and do your bidding.
jessyhalm is offline


Old 08-21-2011, 10:35 PM   #12
Doctorpills

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
.....Dude you gotta start trying to make more sense. I took your troll/troll sock self off iggy cuz I kinda felt bad for you.

If you wanna support Obama through George W. Perry, at least be honest about it.
Stuff it, Saaara. Go ahead and read a bunch of my posts about nObama. Tell me how much support I have for him. Then go hang yourself for being stupid.
Doctorpills is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity