Why the Bush Tax cuts failed. - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**brilkyPlayday** · 07-08-2011, 02:30 PM

All though history as we cut taxes it creates jobs... That is the bulls hit claim, bull shit, because they are only flash in the pan temp jobs and go away after a year or so...

Why did bush cut so much taxes, and our economy go to total shit...

Simple, taxes do not shit for the economy, and that is not what companies were looking for.

Unlike all other examples of history, this time companies had free access to chinese slave labor, and zero tariffs to bring all that cheap worthless chinese plastic shit into the USA, so they just invested it all in china... And zero job creation in the USA.

You factor out all the war spending, and bullshit obama stimulus spending, and the USA has had zero growth since 1999.

Off shoring and the total elimination of tariffs is why our economy sucks.

**Xutrsavf** · 07-08-2011, 04:27 PM

http://youtu.be/ea4dITo-WJc

http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E
http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU
http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I
http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4
http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND

http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM THE BATTLE CRY OF FREEDOM

TOO LITTLE.

LESS THAN 1%.

INFLATION ERASED MOST BENEFIT.

**Pelefaifs** · 07-09-2011, 02:02 AM

They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time.

**RalfDweflywex** · 07-09-2011, 03:03 AM

They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time.

You're aptly named.

**Wrasialat** · 07-09-2011, 03:05 AM

The purpose of the Bush Tax Cuts: To let taxpayers at all income levels keep more of the money that they earned.

That's it. And it was wildly successful. Every tax bracket got a cut. Everybody who paid taxes had less to pay the next year.

This thread is over.

**epPtsDno** · 07-09-2011, 03:05 AM

They didn't fail. Unemployment was decreased by 30 when Bush cut taxes in 2003.

**Enjknsua** · 07-09-2011, 03:11 AM

Fucking wankers....

**ttoothh** · 07-09-2011, 03:13 AM

They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time.

Yeah.. This denies us the most beneficial thing about tax cuts, and undermines their support.

There was a time that I supported tax cuts for everyone, regardless.. I didn't care who got them. Bill Gates? Fine! Works for me! I couldn't give a shit less!

I didn't care, because it was strangling government. Denying them revenue. Shrinking Government reach.. Or, it was supposed to.

But, as you say.. Bush kept rolling out big ticket items and putting them on the credit card.

The result is that.. Frankly, I couldn't give a shit less if Bush, Rush Limbaugh, or any of them pay a 105% effective tax rate.

Fuck them.. they wanted the wars, the huge government and a globe trotting military. They wanted an army of federal cock grabbers at every airport. Bush wanted drugs for grannies. TARP. Microwave heat weapons to use against crowds here at home, and pallets of (now missing) cash and lavish "Enduring bases" abroad.

Let them pay for it. Take everything they have for all I care.

**Filmania** · 07-09-2011, 03:13 AM

Fucking wankers....

What hard-hitting commentary.

Crowley, the site joke since June. Nice work.

**adarmaSen** · 07-09-2011, 03:16 AM

Yeah.. This denies us the most beneficial thing about tax cuts, and undermines their support.

There was a time that I supported tax cuts for everyone, regardless.. I didn't care who got them. Bill Gates? Fine! Works for me! I couldn't give a shit less!

I didn't care, because it was strangling government. Denying them revenue. Shrinking Government reach.. Or, it was supposed to.

But, as you say.. Bush kept rolling out big ticket items and putting them on the credit card.

The result is that.. Frankly, I couldn't give a shit less if Bush, Rush Limbaugh, or any of the pay a 105% effective tax rate.

Fuck them.. they wanted the wars, the huge government and a globe trotting military. They wanted an army of federal cock grabbers at every airport. Bush wanted drugs for grannies. TARP. Microwave heat weapons to use against crowds here at home, and pallets of (now missing) cash and lavish "Enduring bases" abroad.

Let them pay for it. Take everything they have for all I care.

That ain't what the cretin said...

His premise was that congress created the budget, and that Dubya simply went along...

This of course, is entirely backwards.

**Evoncalabbalo** · 07-09-2011, 03:19 AM

That ain't what the cretin said...

His premise was that congress created the budget, and that Dubya simply went along...

This of course, is entirely backwards.

Congress appropriates..

What's your point?

**denyffishh** · 07-09-2011, 03:22 AM

What's your point?

That cretin's tend to get everything backwards.

**22paseabelldaps** · 07-09-2011, 03:22 AM

That cretin's tend to get everything backwards.

What's backwards about it?

**whimpykid** · 07-09-2011, 03:23 AM

What's backwards about it?

You tell me....

**phsyalcvqh** · 07-09-2011, 03:25 AM

You tell me....

They made a budget, he signed it..

They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point..

**AnIInWon** · 07-09-2011, 03:27 AM

They made a budget, he signed it..

They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point..

He's backpedaling now. You can tell that he went to Wikipedia and looked up the budget process only after he made his initial stupid comment.

Crowley, the gift of stupidity that keeps on giving.

**nickayary** · 07-09-2011, 03:29 AM

He should also remember that from January of 07 on, his guys were in congress.. The previous budget wasn't their doing, but they were right there.. Funding all of Georgie's worst excesses.

Nobody so much as let out a peep about any of it..

**xtrudood** · 07-09-2011, 03:33 AM

They made a budget, he signed it..

They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point..

The Executive creates the budget...

Congress then goes through resolution and appropriations.

You're back-editing your posts, which is every bit as chickenshit as altering another's post.

**AdobeCreativeSuite** · 07-09-2011, 03:33 AM

He's backpedaling now. You can tell that he went to Wikipedia and looked up the budget process only after he made his initial stupid comment.

Crowley, the gift of stupidity that keeps on giving.

OMFG!

Total projection.....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!

**Pa33anger** · 07-09-2011, 03:34 AM

The Executive creates the budget...

Congress then goes through resolution and appropriations.

You're back-editing your posts, which is every bit as chickenshit as altering another's post.

I edited to clarify, and prior to your response.. It's hardly some kind of dirty trick.

And Congress is under no obligation whatsoever to adhere to a President's budget.

They can throw it away if they wish..

07-08-2011, 02:30 PM	#1
brilkyPlayday Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 444 Senior Member	Why the Bush Tax cuts failed. All though history as we cut taxes it creates jobs... That is the bulls hit claim, bull shit, because they are only flash in the pan temp jobs and go away after a year or so... Why did bush cut so much taxes, and our economy go to total shit... Simple, taxes do not shit for the economy, and that is not what companies were looking for. Unlike all other examples of history, this time companies had free access to chinese slave labor, and zero tariffs to bring all that cheap worthless chinese plastic shit into the USA, so they just invested it all in china... And zero job creation in the USA. You factor out all the war spending, and bullshit obama stimulus spending, and the USA has had zero growth since 1999. Off shoring and the total elimination of tariffs is why our economy sucks. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-08-2011, 04:27 PM	#2
Xutrsavf Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 437 Senior Member	http://youtu.be/ea4dITo-WJc http://youtu.be/WI6prraK8_E http://youtu.be/Oe3FG4EOgyU http://youtu.be/_F7JkfuMt0I http://youtu.be/YGGXX0o3Bu4 http://youtu.be/zzeLoa1gwCU DIXIE LAND http://youtu.be/5kWADI4umuM THE BATTLE CRY OF FREEDOM TOO LITTLE. LESS THAN 1%. INFLATION ERASED MOST BENEFIT. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 02:02 AM	#3
Pelefaifs Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 495 Senior Member	They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:03 AM	#4
RalfDweflywex Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 578 Senior Member	They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time. You're aptly named. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:05 AM	#5
Wrasialat Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 392 Senior Member	The purpose of the Bush Tax Cuts: To let taxpayers at all income levels keep more of the money that they earned. That's it. And it was wildly successful. Every tax bracket got a cut. Everybody who paid taxes had less to pay the next year. This thread is over. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:05 AM	#6
epPtsDno Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 414 Senior Member	They didn't fail. Unemployment was decreased by 30 when Bush cut taxes in 2003. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:11 AM	#7
Enjknsua Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 570 Senior Member	Fucking wankers.... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:13 AM	#8
ttoothh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 263 Senior Member	They would have done wonders if Bush didn't allow congress to tripple spending at the same time. Yeah.. This denies us the most beneficial thing about tax cuts, and undermines their support. There was a time that I supported tax cuts for everyone, regardless.. I didn't care who got them. Bill Gates? Fine! Works for me! I couldn't give a shit less! I didn't care, because it was strangling government. Denying them revenue. Shrinking Government reach.. Or, it was supposed to. But, as you say.. Bush kept rolling out big ticket items and putting them on the credit card. The result is that.. Frankly, I couldn't give a shit less if Bush, Rush Limbaugh, or any of them pay a 105% effective tax rate. Fuck them.. they wanted the wars, the huge government and a globe trotting military. They wanted an army of federal cock grabbers at every airport. Bush wanted drugs for grannies. TARP. Microwave heat weapons to use against crowds here at home, and pallets of (now missing) cash and lavish "Enduring bases" abroad. Let them pay for it. Take everything they have for all I care. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:13 AM	#9
Filmania Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 478 Senior Member	Fucking wankers.... What hard-hitting commentary. Crowley, the site joke since June. Nice work. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:16 AM	#10
adarmaSen Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 368 Senior Member	Yeah.. This denies us the most beneficial thing about tax cuts, and undermines their support. There was a time that I supported tax cuts for everyone, regardless.. I didn't care who got them. Bill Gates? Fine! Works for me! I couldn't give a shit less! I didn't care, because it was strangling government. Denying them revenue. Shrinking Government reach.. Or, it was supposed to. But, as you say.. Bush kept rolling out big ticket items and putting them on the credit card. The result is that.. Frankly, I couldn't give a shit less if Bush, Rush Limbaugh, or any of the pay a 105% effective tax rate. Fuck them.. they wanted the wars, the huge government and a globe trotting military. They wanted an army of federal cock grabbers at every airport. Bush wanted drugs for grannies. TARP. Microwave heat weapons to use against crowds here at home, and pallets of (now missing) cash and lavish "Enduring bases" abroad. Let them pay for it. Take everything they have for all I care. That ain't what the cretin said... His premise was that congress created the budget, and that Dubya simply went along... This of course, is entirely backwards. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:19 AM	#11
Evoncalabbalo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 572 Senior Member	That ain't what the cretin said... His premise was that congress created the budget, and that Dubya simply went along... This of course, is entirely backwards. Congress appropriates.. What's your point? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:22 AM	#12
denyffishh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 443 Senior Member	What's your point? That cretin's tend to get everything backwards. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:22 AM	#13
22paseabelldaps Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 438 Senior Member	That cretin's tend to get everything backwards. What's backwards about it? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:23 AM	#14
whimpykid Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 611 Senior Member	What's backwards about it? You tell me.... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:25 AM	#15
phsyalcvqh Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 506 Senior Member	You tell me.... They made a budget, he signed it.. They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point.. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

07-09-2011, 03:27 AM	#16
AnIInWon Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 556 Senior Member	They made a budget, he signed it.. They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point.. He's backpedaling now. You can tell that he went to Wikipedia and looked up the budget process only after he made his initial stupid comment. Crowley, the gift of stupidity that keeps on giving. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:29 AM	#17
nickayary Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 396 Senior Member	He should also remember that from January of 07 on, his guys were in congress.. The previous budget wasn't their doing, but they were right there.. Funding all of Georgie's worst excesses. Nobody so much as let out a peep about any of it.. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:33 AM	#18
xtrudood Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 402 Senior Member	They made a budget, he signed it.. They did give him much of what he wanted, if that's your point.. The Executive creates the budget... Congress then goes through resolution and appropriations. You're back-editing your posts, which is every bit as chickenshit as altering another's post. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:33 AM	#19
AdobeCreativeSuite Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 520 Senior Member	He's backpedaling now. You can tell that he went to Wikipedia and looked up the budget process only after he made his initial stupid comment. Crowley, the gift of stupidity that keeps on giving. OMFG! Total projection..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-09-2011, 03:34 AM	#20
Pa33anger Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 713 Senior Member	The Executive creates the budget... Congress then goes through resolution and appropriations. You're back-editing your posts, which is every bit as chickenshit as altering another's post. I edited to clarify, and prior to your response.. It's hardly some kind of dirty trick. And Congress is under no obligation whatsoever to adhere to a President's budget. They can throw it away if they wish.. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote