Reply to Thread New Thread |
02-25-2011, 12:52 AM | #21 |
|
The Germans could've took them out. The Germans could've focused all their Military resources on the Eastern Front to capturing Moscow, then taking it from the central position. But Hitler was focused on capturing the oil fields, which was the primary goal on the African theatre. The Germans were so strong they made the Soviets a superpower. Just look at the casualty and production statistics for the Soviets. No one loses 20,000+ Tanks within six months without having an incredible military industry and economy. |
|
02-25-2011, 12:54 AM | #22 |
|
Yaaaawwwwnnnnn.....and yet....and yet, Nazi Germany is long gone...followed by the USSR a few decades later....Oh yeah, and we're still here. |
|
02-25-2011, 01:01 AM | #23 |
|
The USSR is not gone. Putin's just trying to make it look like there is a new Russia. I'm glad we're still here, but we still have a long Second Cold War ahead of us.The Nazi military was, I believe, the greatest military we have seen along with Napoleon's Grand Army and the Mongol Armies of Genghis Khan. BTW, you are going on like one of Hitler's henchmen, sitting on his steps in South America 1950, about what could have been, while chickens pick grit in his door yard..... |
|
02-25-2011, 01:11 AM | #24 |
|
And yet they were defeated by what I consider to have been (HAVE been) the greatest military ever; the American allied forces. |
|
02-25-2011, 01:21 AM | #25 |
|
I'm no Nazi, I can guarantee you that. I'm just trying to get out the answers. Without the Soviets, the Germans would've beat the Americans. Their Navy potential that it took endless merchant production to end the fear of them starving the British out of the war. U-Boats proved that modern navies rely on submarines. Also, the German Air Force was far technologically superior to that of the American Air force. It would've taken a very determined guerilla campaign to knock the Germans out of the homeland, as proven by the Bermuda conference. Their airforce was good, but we beat them too. I'll admit, Russia was needed. But going to war in the Soviet winter was not a particularly bright move by Mr Adolph. |
|
02-25-2011, 01:40 AM | #26 |
|
The U-boats almost killed us, until we captured one, then figured out their codes. But hey, that's war. And that's why we won. We outsmarted them, got lucky, whatever. |
|
02-25-2011, 03:03 AM | #27 |
|
|
|
02-25-2011, 01:24 PM | #28 |
|
|
|
02-27-2011, 08:48 PM | #29 |
|
And yet they were defeated by what I consider to have been (HAVE been) the greatest military ever; the American allied forces. I admire your fervor but I think it was the Russians who basically beat the Germans. The casualty figures don't substantiate this but it's true nevertheless. The German army, once it started it's retreat from Russia, never stopped. 5.5 million German soldiers died while 10.7 million Russian soldiers bit the dust. It was a gross waste of human life. It was unbelievable that the Germans had the audacity to open a two front war. Stupid too. |
|
02-27-2011, 08:54 PM | #30 |
|
http://www.ww2incolor.com/german/De...Gefallene.html |
|
02-27-2011, 08:59 PM | #31 |
|
|
|
02-27-2011, 09:04 PM | #32 |
|
|
|
02-28-2011, 12:49 AM | #33 |
|
Very True. It gave another reason for Hitler to rant against the Allied forces of WWI, and the Jews. |
|
02-28-2011, 12:51 AM | #34 |
|
The treaty was very restrictive. The Germans really suffered under it. Woodrow Wilson stated that if he were at the signing (he was Ill), it would not have been the same, or something akin to that. I guess he meant verbage. Wilson thought it was too tough a treaty also. |
|
03-03-2011, 06:21 AM | #35 |
|
Very True. It gave another reason for Hitler to rant against the Allied forces of WWI, and the Jews. You don't know probably a quarter of the internal grievances and centuries old axes to be ground. Versailles was not a plot. It was an idealist debacle. Hitler had a chance to rebuild Germany. He was never interested in just doing that though. The entire revitalization was hitched to the war wagon in both economy and philosophy. Liebensraum, baby, liebensraum. |
|
03-03-2011, 06:23 AM | #36 |
|
The treaty was very restrictive. The Germans really suffered under it. Woodrow Wilson stated that if he were at the signing (he was Ill), it would not have been the same, or something akin to that. I guess he meant verbage. Wilson thought it was too tough a treaty also. |
|
03-03-2011, 10:05 AM | #37 |
|
|
|
03-03-2011, 10:45 PM | #38 |
|
As opposed to the saber rattling buffoonery of the Kaiser or the schizo ambivalance of the Austro-Hungarians? |
|
03-04-2011, 05:12 PM | #39 |
|
So what. They started one against Poland. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|