[realfan87]

By FELICITY BARRINGER

Published: February 4, 2011 NEW YORK TIMES




SAN FRANCISCO — California’s landmark law on curbing greenhouse gases, which is well on its way to taking effect, has hit a legal snag in the form of a tentative judicial ruling that state environmental regulators failed to follow legally required procedures. ......

MORE AT NEW YORK TIMES

[ChrisGoldstein]

A tentative ruling?
Is that like dealing the cards face up?

The strategy of the Left is to relentlessly apply pressure on several fronts until an objective is achieved.
If someone blocks them, they just try again.
And again. And again.

This is all about weakening America and placing her in the chains of foreign bondage.

[AdobebePhoto]

Cap and Tax carbon dioxide all you want. China will make more.

These people are like vampires, bleeding every last nickle out of the people in their state, so that they can make money producing nothing, and clearing the air of even less.

[TaxSheemaSter]

I don't have an NYT account.. But if it's that silly bitch writing it, I know it's comedy.

[vipbunter]

While no one maintains that carbon dioxide is a hazardous pollutant dangerous to local communities, Alegría De La Cruz, a lawyer for the Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment, said that carbon dioxide rules often have “co-benefits” in terms of controlling other, more immediately toxic air pollutants. Creating different incentives or mandates for regulating carbon dioxide might thus be more beneficial for those communities, Ms. De La Cruz said. Wow....just....fucking wow.

[somasideff]

THIS COUNTRY IS FULL OF SILLY BITCHES.... AND A LOT OF THEM WEAR BRITCHES.....

[dgdhgjjgj]

Wow....just....fucking wow.

Wow.. They just sorta let the whole cat right out of the bag there, huh?

[Qeiafib]

ACCOUNT, SENOR? I DON'T GOT NO ACCOUNT.... YOU DON'T NEED NO STINKING ACCOUNT!


www.nyt.com




SCIENCE SECTION (SO-CALLED)

[Nafheense]

It told me to log in..

[UnmariKam]

IT DOESN'T FUCK WITH ME. I NEVER LOG IN. CIA?

[ArrichMer]

(02-04) 04:00 PST Sacramento - --
The California Air Resources Board violated state environmental law in 2008 when it adopted a comprehensive plan to reduce greenhouse gases and again last year when it passed cap-and-trade regulations, a San Francisco Superior Court judge has ruled in a tentative decision.
If the decision is made final, California would be barred from implementing its ambitious plan to combat global warming until it complies with portions of the California Environmental Quality Act, though it is not yet clear what the air board would have to do to be in compliance.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...#ixzz1DEEz1quz

[Soypopetype]

(02-04) 04:00 PST Sacramento - --
The California Air Resources Board violated state environmental law in 2008 when it adopted a comprehensive plan to reduce greenhouse gases and again last year when it passed cap-and-trade regulations, a San Francisco Superior Court judge has ruled in a tentative decision.
If the decision is made final, California would be barred from implementing its ambitious plan to combat global warming until it complies with portions of the California Environmental Quality Act, though it is not yet clear what the air board would have to do to be in compliance.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...#ixzz1DEEz1quz

My suggestion :

DISBAND!