[TiepayWrary]

It seems reasonable to assume that sex crimes/sexual maniacs are much more prevalent than they used to be, because porn/soft-porn/basically whatever you call those pictures on the cover of magazines at the grocery store is basically everywhere nowadays. So, if we didn't have so much "porn" around, then people wouldn't feel so tempted in the sex department and hence, wouldn't have their character so weakened by it.

[TZtrDuso]

At the risk of sounding prudish.. It does seem that things are getting worse in this regard.

[JesikaFlpk]

I wouldn't say they're getting worse, just more common. Quantity instead of quality. In the old empirical days, only the super rich aristocrats had the time to be decedent oafs. Having orgies, fucking children, homosexual sodomy...

It's going on today more, but not quite to the same extent or nearly as unhinged. It's still a good way to get busted and thrown in jail for a month if you get caught with a hooker, it still can be a stigma to be viewed as gay, as well as it should be. But what I'm saying is the filth has spread down to the commoners... but in doing so has become watered down. Though from all the news articles, the rich elite still do the shit they did back then. The only thing that's changed is our view of it.

Serfs wanted to be better then that, they wanted better for their children. So we formed things like The Inquisition in retaliation... nowadays it's mostly just penis envy. (Yes, the pun was on purpose... lol!) They're just jealous they're not quite as gigantic sociopaths and demented sick fucks...

A fully functioning society cannot have everyone be a perverted mess. It only works now because the elite do most of it, and the rest of us are merely experimenting with it. But society will eventually collapse, we're starting to see it now... we cannot continue like this. Either the elite's going to have to crackdown on sexual debauchery for the poor, or a new social movement will have to uprise to destroy it entirely. Or we're going to end up like Haiti.

[mdUzAMbG]

I wouldn't say they're getting worse, just more common. Quantity instead of quality. In the old empirical days, only the super rich aristocrats had the time to be decedent oafs. Having orgies, fucking children, homosexual sodomy...

It's going on today more, but not quite to the same extent or nearly as unhinged. It's still a good way to get busted and thrown in jail for a month if you get caught with a hooker, it still can be a stigma to be viewed as gay, as well as it should be. But what I'm saying is the filth has spread down to the commoners... but in doing so has become watered down. Though from all the news articles, the rich elite still do the shit they did back then. The only thing that's changed is our view of it.

Serfs wanted to be better then that, they wanted better for their children. So we formed things like The Inquisition in retaliation... nowadays it's mostly just penis envy. (Yes, the pun was on purpose... lol!) They're just jealous they're not quite as gigantic sociopaths and demented sick fucks...

A fully functioning society cannot have everyone be a perverted mess. It only works now because the elite do most of it, and the rest of us are merely experimenting with it. But society will eventually collapse, we're starting to see it now... we cannot continue like this. Either the elite's going to have to crackdown on sexual debauchery for the poor, or a new social movement will have to uprise to destroy it entirely. Or we're going to end up like Haiti.

You were among those who formed the Inquisition? How old are you?

What was the pun about "penis envy?"

How are you experimenting with perversion?

How can you elitists "crack down" on sexual debauchery for the poor? Why would you want to?

[Niiinioa]

It seems reasonable to assume that sex crimes/sexual maniacs are much more prevalent than they used to be, because porn/soft-porn/basically whatever you call those pictures on the cover of magazines at the grocery store is basically everywhere nowadays. So, if we didn't have so much "porn" around, then people wouldn't feel so tempted in the sex department and hence, wouldn't have their character so weakened by it.

Since you are asking for an opinion, it is my view that sexual deviancy is spawned from the moral decay of society, and without guidance, each generation will become more primal than the last. We live in a world, where man defines, more and more, what is moral, and no one wants to think that he, or she, is immoral, so they tweak the definition until it is meaningless. Morality has to be defined by God, or it is just a construct of man. If it is a construct of man, then it is always waiting to become perverted by the rationalizing minds of the immoral, who are seeking salvation, and adjust the definition to suit them. As an example: Homosexuals don't wish to feel bad about their behaviors, so we call it "normal" and take the stigma away.

Sexual deviants, and pornography, are basically the same monster, feeding each other in perpetuity. One does not exist without the other.

[Biradallo]

I think "Sex Mania" is basically a vehicle for The Cultural Revolution in America.

Vice is easier to sell, than virtue and lust is the easiest vice to sell of all.

Appealing to morality is the last and greatest defense of the weak, against the strong.

Big governments and big corporations are very strong; individuals are very weak.

Without Faith (faith in God's law; morality) and Reason, all that is left is power. Hence the phrase, might makes right.

Thus, what The Sexual Revolution accomplishes is a Cultural Revolution, which wrecks Faith and Reason (through rationalization of misbehavior), leaving us with just power, which the state and its big corporate buddies monopolizes and hence, we all become slaves (no longer beloved subjects, as part of a national family) of the state and big corporations. This radical change in status leaves nothing in the way of ambition (since guilt is "eliminated"), other than, presumably, access to power.