[Poeetiol]

November 11, 2010 - Today, as pious public honors are paid in the US and UK to those killed on behalf of whatever the ruling elites of their day decided was the "national interest," we can do no greater service than point you to Arthur Silber's latest, and urge you to go there and read the whole thing (including the wealth of links). Below is a brief excerpt, dealing with the fundamental evil at the basis of the administration of the most progressively progressive Peace Laureate to ever hold public office: Barack Obama's jaw-dropping assertion, in open court, of his (and his minions') right to murder any any person in the world, including American citizens, without any charge, any evidence, any due process at all -- and without even having to give a reason for the murder (a nicety that not even Stalin's purgers felt they could dispense with)...
http://uruknet.com/?p=m71763&hd=&size=1&l=e

[AntonayPina]

me being me, i understand our government does what they want when they want, including murder, using our forces as the murder machine, etc..... so what is it this article is asking of us?

[offemyJuccete]

I was going to make fun of you saying "any any", but this is an interesting subject, something that should be discussed more. Here in the United States, the right to trail is in our Constitution!

While it is sad, in times of war we have no choice but abandon some of our values. Another thing I would like to point out is that even though these "enemies" didn't get their trail, it wouldn't have been wrong for a soldier to kill him in self defense. This is where the fine line is drawn, between enemies, and neutrals.

Collateral damage is a fact of war, no matter how good our technology gets. Our Senate, Our House, and Our President voted for War, and by extension so did the American People. If you are to make the argument that we needed to attack Iraq, then why not at least go all out. How can they possibly be wasting congresses time, complaining about collateral damage. This is War, people die, people get fucked up, Men are left to fates worse than death.

War is only a glorious thing to those who do not know it.

Yes! We were attacked on 9/11, and our response was one of several good options. We made the mistake when we decided that we can't simply go after those who were responsible, we have to take their Country and rebuild it for them. I don't see why my tax money should be going over there, when there are things it's needed for here! How is it that everyone wonders why we are in a recession, isn't it obvious? We have been waging war with one nation for nearly 10 years! We have been funding not only our side of the war effort, but to rebuild their cities, not as in WWII when we waited until we won, but while the war is still being fought.

We have taken the Vietnam idea, and gone ten fold with it. In Nam, all we did was destroy their homes, we didn't really rebuild them, or try to make them into a democratic society. We have been Fighting two wars, and funding two rebuilding projects, of 2 entire nations for nearly 7 years!

THAT is the problem!

[Super-Luser]

[QUOTE=markendsley;38272]I was going to make fun of you saying "any any", but this is an interesting subject, something that should be discussed more. Here in the United States, the right to trail is in our Constitution!

What's funny about a typo or a malfunction of the computer? You're stretching, my man. Also, why do we have a right to trail? Trail whom? Why should we trail them?

While it is sad, in times of war we have no choice but abandon some of our values. Another thing I would like to point out is that even though these "enemies" didn't get their trail, it wouldn't have been wrong for a soldier to kill him in self defense. This is where the fine line is drawn, between enemies, and neutrals.

"Didn't get their trail?" You mean they didn't sniff hard enough?

Collateral damage is a fact of war, no matter how good our technology gets. Our Senate, Our House, and Our President voted for War, and by extension so did the American People. If you are to make the argument that we needed to attack Iraq, then why not at least go all out. How can they possibly be wasting congresses (sic)time, complaining about collateral damage. This is War, people die, people get fucked up, Men are left to fates worse than death.

War is only a glorious thing to those who do not know it.

Then George Patton didn't know much about war. He said: "War, God how I love it!"

Yes! We were attacked on 9/11, and our response was one of several good options. We made the mistake when we decided that we can't simply go after those who were responsible, we have to take their Country and rebuild it for them. I don't see why my tax money should be going over there, when there are things it's needed for here!

Would you have also applied that thinking in 1941?

How is it that everyone wonders why we are in a recession, isn't it obvious? We have been waging war with one nation for nearly 10 years! We have been funding not only our side of the war effort, but to rebuild their cities, not as in WWII when we waited until we won, but while the war is still being fought.

The Israelis look forward to occupying those countries in the future, and they don't want to have to do the rebuilding themselves when they can make Uncle Sap do it for them.

We have taken the Vietnam idea, and gone ten fold with it. In Nam, all we did was destroy their homes, we didn't really rebuild them, or try to make them into a democratic society. We have been Fighting two wars, and funding two rebuilding projects, of 2 entire nations for nearly 7 years!

The Jews aren't all that interested in occupying Viet Nam at this time.

THAT is the problem!

Actually, the problem is people who can't see the perfidy of the Jews for the propaganda forced on them by the kike press.