LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-04-2010, 06:34 AM   #1
metrocartockasur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
633
Senior Member
Default Labor Question..
Can someone please explain to me, in words, what "right" employees have to haul their employers before a mediation board? Or what "right" employees have to unionize AT ALL?

I know all about the Wagner act, so spare me the legalese.. I want to know what moral right they think they have to do anything of the kind in the first place.

I mean, they're the employees.. Who the fuck are they to dictate ANYTHING and who is the government to do the same?

If they're so unhappy, why don't they JUST QUIT? What would be unfair about that?

You don't like the job.. Pay.. Benefits.. Hours.. Whatever. Then you LEAVE.

What's so fucking difficult about this?
metrocartockasur is offline


Old 11-04-2010, 01:42 PM   #2
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
what "right" employees have to unionize AT ALL? All unionization is, is communication. Employees getting together and saying, if ones fired, we're all fired.

If all the Engineers that live in an area join the same Union, and agree to either all work with their respected demands, or all quit (Which as you said, they have the right to do).

You don't like the job.. Pay.. Benefits.. Hours.. Whatever. Then you LEAVE. This is how it works if you hire Non Unionized help, which is an employers choice. The problem with Non Union work is that they are often unskilled.

If I graduate from college, and I can join a Union and make twice as much as just going and getting a job, why wouldn't I join the Union? Unions are workers collaborating just like management and ownership is allowed to.

Where I do disagree with this, is when these people start trying to make laws. That is where they go too far.
Licacivelip is offline


Old 11-04-2010, 01:59 PM   #3
rootoronpunty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
All unionization is, is communication. Employees getting together and saying, if ones fired, we're all fired.
No... that is collective bargaining. (Something I agree with, as it is the heart of at will employment.)

Unionization is different because it doesn't involve government force.

This is how it works if you hire Non Unionized help, which is an employers choice. No it is not. You can be hauled before a mediation board for refusing the recognize a union vote.
rootoronpunty is offline


Old 11-04-2010, 02:12 PM   #4
Cengaeas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
344
Senior Member
Default
the company bidding on a mandated " scale " job, getting the contract, then paying the workers regular pay.
Cengaeas is offline


Old 11-04-2010, 02:16 PM   #5
Reafnartefs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
No it is not. You can be hauled before a mediation board for refusing the recognize a union vote. Then how does Wal mart do it? If the Wal Mart employees went to the management with a union, they would all be immediately fired. Businesses have the option to do this, they will simply lose many good employees.

Of course, if all the Auto Mechanics in an area belong to one union, you either have to hire from that union or close down shop.
Reafnartefs is offline


Old 11-04-2010, 05:00 PM   #6
KkJvrG4d

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default



TO HELL WITH UNIONS. TO HELL WITH SPECIAL PRIVILEGES UNDER LAW FOR ANYONE.
KkJvrG4d is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity