LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-31-2010, 09:41 PM   #1
aLZ9zKsO

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
476
Senior Member
Default Money Capitalists vs Productive Capitalists: Articulant way of explaining the market
Ayn Rand tried to make it out like the world can be madeup of productive capitalists, but failed to address what to do about money capitalists. The same goes for libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, and to a lesser extent republicans. The only one amongst these jackals who I can tolerate is anarcho-capitalists. Who atleast respect you enough as a human being not to ban you. But I think that's because anarcho-capitalists aren't real capitalists either. But merely trotskyists who want a liberal socialism, and use money as the medium for that freedom without any central ownership.
aLZ9zKsO is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 12:09 AM   #2
AlexDatig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default

Ayn Rand tried to make it out (poor use of words) like the world can be madeup (two words)of productive capitalists, but failed to address what to do about money capitalists (redundancy). The same goes for libertarians, anarcho-capitalists (is this a word? I don't think so), and to a lesser extent republicans. The only one amongst these jackals who (sic, sp."whom")I can tolerate is anarcho-capitalists (plural doesn't fit with sentence). Who atleast (two words, idiot)respect you enough as a human being not to ban you. But I think that's because anarcho-capitalists aren't real capitalists either. But merely trotskyists (sp., "Trotskyites")who want a liberal socialism, and use money as the medium for that freedom without any central ownership.
These English lessons will no longer be gratis if you don't begin to shape up.

Also the word "articulate" is misspelled in the title.
AlexDatig is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 12:28 AM   #3
haittiweerved

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
340
Senior Member
Default
The fuzzy Canadian wookie/thing has a point.. But it is one he made unintentionally.

Bailouts are the SUPREME, GALACTIC BULLSHIT precisely because the real service the money capitalist provides is the assumption of risk.

This is his role in the financial food chain. He assesses and assumes risk that (Hopefully) leads to production, employment, demand and a return on capital invested.

At whatever point you de-link the risk from the reward, then he becomes useless... Because he is no longer "investing"

He's stealing from taxpayers who are now forced to assume the costs of his failure to properly assess the risk.. While he would have happily pocketed a return if the venture had been a successful one.. and kept it for himself... Like a gigantic motherfucking kike.
haittiweerved is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 12:32 AM   #4
orerviche

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
And it is "Articulate" btw.
orerviche is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 03:29 AM   #5
mas-dkt-sive

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default



GOBBLING IDIOTS ON PARADE....
mas-dkt-sive is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 08:52 PM   #6
Ygd2qr8k

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
The fuzzy Canadian wookie/thing has a point.. But it is one he made unintentionally.

Bailouts are the SUPREME, GALACTIC BULLSHIT precisely because the real service the money capitalist provides is the assumption of risk.

This is his role in the financial food chain. He assesses and assumes risk that (Hopefully) leads to production, employment, demand and a return on capital invested.

At whatever point you de-link the risk from the reward, then he becomes useless... Because he is no longer "investing"

He's stealing from taxpayers who are now forced to assume the costs of his failure to properly assess the risk.. While he would have happily pocketed a return if the venture had been a successful one.. and kept it for himself... Like a gigantic motherfucking kike.
Right, but it isn't the fault of the capitalist, it is the fault of the government for giving the money, and the fault of the taxpayers for allowing it. I doubt it would have happened under a white regime. No, I am wrong, the Jews would have forced it under any regime.
Ygd2qr8k is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:24 PM   #7
indianstory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
532
Senior Member
Default

Ayn Rand tried to make it out like the world can be madeup of productive capitalists, but failed to address what to do about money capitalists. The same goes for libertarians, anarcho-capitalists, and to a lesser extent republicans. The only one amongst these jackals who I can tolerate is anarcho-capitalists. Who atleast respect you enough as a human being not to ban you. But I think that's because anarcho-capitalists aren't real capitalists either. But merely trotskyists who want a liberal socialism, and use money as the medium for that freedom without any central ownership.
You think I'm going to listen to a fagot dressed like Castro with a header that says "Maoist Rebel News?"
indianstory is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:27 PM   #8
AlexanderDrew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
The fagot fucks who want to "enslave you" via capitalism are ALL on the left and they do so in an attempt to manifest socialism... These "corporations" are already working with those in the government to ensure THEIR victory...
AlexanderDrew is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:40 PM   #9
chuecfafresslds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default
Right, but it isn't the fault of the capitalist, it is the fault of the government for giving the money, and the fault of the taxpayers for allowing it.
Yeah, but they took it.. So, I'm fresh out of pity.
chuecfafresslds is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:46 PM   #10
plantBanceper

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
the money the capitalist pt up is backed by nothing. they have no skin in the game it is just 1's and 0's in a computer.

So you are a slave to the capitalist for nothing.

this is conditioning.
plantBanceper is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:50 PM   #11
caseferter

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
the money the capitalist pt up is backed by nothing. they have no skin in the game it is just 1's and 0's in a computer.

So you are a slave to the capitalist for nothing.

this is conditioning.
You better believe its backed by something, its backed by production and trade and production and trade is VERY attractive to investors..

Only a dolt would find the concept of capitalism too hard to comprehend...

If you dont understand how it works then you shouldn't have an opinion on it..
caseferter is offline


Old 11-01-2010, 09:56 PM   #12
Idonnaink

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
395
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, but they took it.. So, I'm fresh out of pity.
Don't tell me you wouldn't have taken it.
Idonnaink is offline


Old 11-02-2010, 08:24 PM   #13
Eltabaco

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
You better believe its backed by something, its backed by production and trade and production and trade is VERY attractive to investors..

Only a dolt would find the concept of capitalism too hard to comprehend...

If you dont understand how it works then you shouldn't have an opinion on it..
So you say the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OWNS OUR PRODUCTION? What skin in the game does the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK PUT UP? The government is forced to buy bonds form the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and every dollar created is created in debt with interest to paid back to the FEDERAL BANK and they put up nothing.
Eltabaco is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity