LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-26-2010, 01:47 AM   #21
RayFairhurst

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
496
Senior Member
Default



ANY NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE ENEMY SHOULD ONLY COMMENCE AFTER SURRENDER... MAKE SURE THAT YOUR SIDE WINS.. OTHERWISE YOU MAY NOT LIKE THE TERMS. INDEED, YOU ALMOST CERTAINLY WON'T LIKE THEM.
Yup. Get your millitary, get the best millitary minds together. Once the government decides to go to war, make your objectives clear, give them to the millitary, and leave them alone until they're done. My guess is if we'd let them do it their way, most conflicts would be over fast anyway.
RayFairhurst is offline


Old 10-26-2010, 01:51 AM   #22
8cyVn4RJ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
Yeah.. I feel SO MUCH safer nao.



Agreed..



It resembles Neo-Colonialism.

If Clinton was doing it, we'd call it "Nation Building"

Imperial hubris..
Today they were talking about a 15 year old that threw a grenade in an US convoy vehicle and killed sevearl soldiers. They captured him and took him to Gitmo, he's now ready to please guilty. Why did they bother bringing him back? What a waste of money and effort.

Neo coonialism, it's hallarious. I don't know why we act like oil is so precious. I've said all along, negotiate with grain, we'll see how serious it gets when they're starving.
All the shit we've been through over there, and did any American company even get an oil lease contract? It's a joke.
8cyVn4RJ is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity