Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I write down on my facebook who I plan to vote for and why, I do the thinking for my friends since alot of times, the media and even the web are unreliable in giving you the information you need. And whilest there's no way in hell I could take the time to do the research, then tell you. (It took me two days just to get this far) I can give you MY opinion, and then you can choose to follow it or not. Based on the abridged version why I voted the way I did. Here is the results.
![]() Attorney General: Jim Lewis (NPA) An easy way to get elected is on your website have a big cannabis leaf with capslock "LEGALIZE IT!!!" Which is exactly what this guy did. Chief Financial Officer: Loranne Ausley (DEM) It's not often I like a democrat. But really if I'm going to vote for anyone to control the revenue of my state, I want it to be someone who does it for child healthcare, disabled people, and lawsuits against other government agencies. Those may not be the most important or most popular issues we face, but they are definitelly ones that hit close to home. I still feel bad for the way I looked down on the mentally handicapped for half my life, and maybe if we had programs for them, I could get over that guilt. Commissioner of Agriculture: Ira Chester (TEA)This has got to be the most useless position ever. But atleast Ira is talking about lifting regulations that stop food and energy producers from basically lowering their prices to actually make things competitive. Obviously food/gasoline should be cheaper. I may be somewhat bias because I see "tea party" on the ballot, and I want to be part of this fad of libertarian satire. State Represenative District 58: Janet Cruz (DEM) I'm between a rock and a hard place here. I really really don't want to vote for this bitch. Half her fucking website is in spanish, but you know what the other guy did? Said he doesn't know shit about anything, and made a big list of things he WOULDN'T do. One of which included "not tell a woman how to handle her reproductive system". Oh duur huur huur! You so funny...FUCK YOU!!!! I'll suck it up and vote for the democrat. Board of County Commissioners District 3: Lesley "Les" Miller It was either him, or write in. Yes, "Him". I do not expect someone named Lesley or "Les" for short to be an old black man. Board of County Commissioners District 5: Ken HaganThis is the only guy voting for Ammendment 2. The others are saying Ammendment 2 would give tax cuts to new buinsesses. (Which think about... don't we WANT new buisnesses to compete with bigger old ones?) Which it doesn't. It's tax exemption for homesteads of veterans. So I just really cannot make it any clearer other then they're fucking lying. Board of Country Dommissioners District 7: Myself in write-in God... you could cut the lame stereotypicalness of these politicians with a butterknife! On one side you got that lameass liberal jargon. "Appeal to the youth!" "Stop breast cancer!" "I'm hip yo!" Then you got the other guy tossing footballs and shaking hands at coffee lounges like anybody gives a fuck. Why don't you two just go ahead and kiss on a Justin Beiber video? Also the libfuck made my computer lag because he didn't have his own website and I had to go to some cryptic one with over 9000 ads to learn about him. Luckiely he's old, and will probably die soon. Shall Justice Charles T. Canady be retained in office: Yes. It's very rare to see a "conservative democrat". (Especially a self proclaimed one) So I'll vote for a conservative democrat over a conservative republican, not only because I'd agree with them generally more, but because you want to reward those democrats that comeout against the libtarded agenda. He even coined the phrase partial birth abortion. That's a feat. Also some website said he's a registered republican, do people get blowjobs for blatantly lying on political websites? Shall Justice Jorge Labarga be retained in office: No. Who the fuck is this guy, the men in black?! I cannot find anything about him. He's like a fucking ninja, and I don't want ninja doing secret constitutional rulings. I mean seriously, you go to any website, and all you see is a photo, (not even a personal one, just one of him in robes) some vague information about his age, location, and other shit I don't give a CRAP about... what's he afraid of us knowing? Shall Justice James E.C. Perrty be retained in office: *Heavy voice* NO! Another men in black. So men in black he's purple. Not only can I find no information on this guy, but every website feels the need to remind you he's the first negro judge for his district. Whoopty fucking doo. Being black is not an accomplishment, when are people going to accept that? Shall Justice Ricky L. Polston be retained in office: I suppose! I don't know why it's so friggin hard to find information on judges. You'd think ruling on alot of serious buisness would get more public attention. Oh wait... that'd make too much sense! But planned parenthood baaaw'd at him. So I guess he can stay. (Even though it was over something stupid. I shit you not... prolife liscence plates. Yes, planned parenthood is so for personal choice, they want to make sure you don't personally choose to tell us you're prolife!) ![]() Shall Judge Marva L. Crenshaw be retained in office: Guess not. Crenshaw seems to be a common black name. (I guess blacks are klingons now...) Really, we should just stick every supreme court nominee in a dimly lit room and threaten to twist their nipples off untill THEY FUCKING TELL US WHAT THEY STAND FOR. Shall Judge Patricia Kelley be retained in office: No No No No No No. I'm getting really fucking sick of this. I'm just going to keep voting no untill I get some God-damn answers. We shouldn't even have judges if this is how they're going to act. Shall Judge Nelly N. Khouzam be retained in office: You already know the answer. I went to three fucking sites. All of which loaded like shit by the way... and all I could get out of them is Nelly is a woman, she has a daughter, and is a judge. They have fucking satalites in space that know exactly where you live, but they can't fucking tell me what the hell Nelly believes in to decide if she'd make a good judge or not. Its just fucking embarrassing how we love talking about how "America is better then other countries". No. No it is not. North Korea has fucking less beurocracy then we do. Shall Judge Robert Morris be retained in office: It's a conspiracy. No, seriously. This sortof secrecy has to be by design. When I go to find this guy and I get a judge from THE FUCKING 1700s... something is definitelly wrong. There's fucking ten of these guys to vote for, and only two of them have any remote information on them AT ALL... that's fucking scary. Thats pickup a gun and start shooting people scary. Cause when you do as much waiting around for a fucking site to load and googling all day long like I do, and all your left with is "well... they worked on reducing the size of prisons a-durp!" There aren't words to describe your rage... Shall Judge Stevan T. Northcutt be retained in office: Sigh. I should just vote fucking no on all of them. But thats not the kind of person I am. Despite the way I get treated, shit really does concern me. And I wouldn't feel right not atleast TRYING to know the facts before I vote a certain way. But thats why it pisses me so much. Because these sick bastards get off on your ignorance. I'm going to save you the trouble of reading the other two, and just say that this was the most stressful and painful thing I've ever done. Researching these hellish judges was more painful then my balls swelling to the size of grapefruits, I kid you not. I'm just so angry, so disgusted, I can't see straight. I may have to stop researching candidates and do the rest tommorow because I'm just on the virge of tears from how many fucking judges, how little we actually know, and how integral every facet of the elections are and there's just so little information given to us on purpose. But I'll try to deal with it and continue this run down for my readers. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Note: I had to make a second post because of character limits. Now I know a strange glitch about this forum. If I just put a massive string of quote, it does not count as part of the character limits and you need atleast two to make a topic. HOWEVER, if I put in said characters and then quote, it all counts as part of the character limit. How fucking infuiriorating.
If anyone thinks this is ridiculous. I want you to remember this is exactly what our government does. This total topic before I altered it with my commentary here, was >13,000 characters. That was the short version of explaining the politicians, their positions, and why I was voting for them. Now you know why they get away with so much. School Board Member District 6: April Griffin Well to put it simply... Where as the other was just bullshit about entrepenuers and family, this broad actually had the decency to make a blog about her opinions, and say that she thinks it's wrong colleges are asking for criminal background checks. I think thats wrong too. But mostly It's just a breath of fresh air to see someone with a fucking blog up and actually doing some of that transparency we heard so much about but never got. I'm going to get a fucking stroke here. I have to stop thinking about those judges. That shit was worse then Tiamat. The lag of internet explorer certainly did not help. I'm using Chrome now. Soil and Water Conservation District Group 1: I don't fucking know. I'll have to worry about this later. Because I'm just too fucking pissed at this point. There's still like five more things to talk about, but I'm going to do it later. Cause it's been four or five hours. I've been spending four or five hours looking up shit after shit after shit and finding nothing on these assholes. Coupled with the fact that there is just no reason for this. Why in the fuck do we need a water and conservation district group? Why is there even more then one? WHY DO WE NEED ALL THESE FUCKING POSITIONS?! Whjy don't we just have a district member for whiping asses while were at it? Why isn't the so called libertarian party or smaller government conservatives more worried about stripping down half of these positions rather then whining about buzz issues like taxation and legislation against abortions? You can worry about that bullshit once you've actually prove you want to reduce the size of government. I'm a fucking communist and even I want to get rid of these motherfuckers because there's just no excuse for it. There is no reason to have a soil and water conservation district. You know what that's called? It's called the water company. They make sure the water is clean, we vote on whether or not we have a water limit per month, and thats fucking it. We don't need some guy incharge of that. We don't need management. God fucking damnit man! ![]() Soil and Water Conservation District 1: Joe Wendt The only person with any information at all. Was captain of Ron Paul's campaign for 2008, is a tea party advocate. Mostly I was going to vote for him cause I discovered who was our conservationist districter previously,... and didn't want the same guy. (Tzeentchfag) The other one just cameup with the word "progressive". May have been a different guy, but didn't want to take any chances. Seeing as he has some flatout information, and supported Ron Paul, he can't be all bad. But if he was a real Ron Paul advocate, he'd push to get rid of half these positions. Not run for them. Soil and Water Conservation District 5: Stuart Weiss Is it supposed to be cute there's five candidates on this ballot? Ugh... well, I managed to conclude who the previous district conserver was, that's one less person. One of them is a woman, not going to vote that. (lololol) Another is in the libertarian party. DEFINITELLY not going to vote for that! The other is a neckbeard with a site even more primitive then something I've made. So that leaves only this putha'. United States Senator: Bernie Decastro (CPF) You know, in all honesty. This is how the constitution party works. They sound fantastic, and then they say something crazy. Something so fucking crazy it could collapse an otherwise wonderful house of good positions. Maybe thats why I've thought of joining the constitution party in the past, as I'd fit right in. For instance, this guy believes in repealing the seventeenth ammendment that turned the senate vote from being state legislators deciding senators too a popular vote. So he wants to back to good old fashioned feudalism! I give him this much, thats a much more accurate "republic" then the so called republicans... So why am I voting for this guy at all? Because he hates gays, he hates abortions, wants to give term limits to house represenatives AND senators... and he called the republican senate candidate a "flamming liberal". So he gets my vote for the lulz.. Fascism forward!!! Represenative In Congress District 11: Mike Prendergast Now, this guy does not really seem likeable to me. He's friends with Bill McCollum, (arch rival of Rick Scott) and was endorsed by Jeb Bush. (We were so close to never hearing about the bushes again...) But considering hate opponent is a woman, a woman who thinks that spending thousands on how monkey's react to cocaine is "science", 2.6 million on teaching chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly, and 3.4 million on "turtle tunnels"... yeah, I guess compared to that he isn't so bad. Governor: Rick Scott I didn't bother to spread his name if I wasn't going to vote for him. But just my luck his lietunant governor would be a woman. Ohwell... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
I write down on my facebook who I plan to vote for and why, I do the thinking for my friends since alot of times, the media and even the web are unreliable in giving you the information you need. And whilest there's no way in hell I could take the time to do the research, then tell you. (It took me two days just to get this far) I can give you MY opinion, and then you can choose to follow it or not. Based on the abridged version why I voted the way I did. Here is the results. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|