Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Egypt and Kush never really had a influence over the Middle East. The Middle East influenced Egypt and Kush ever since Assyria conquered Egypt. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
It has been a homogeneous Caucasoid area through out all of times with a minor influx of north Africans. When looking at certain sub-ethnicities of parts of ancient Phoenicia such as Lebanon and the Maronites; you get a fully homogeneous Caucasoid people while the Sunnis have a minor African component. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Get outta here bro, there've been found monuments with the hieroglyphs for "vagina" ( aka p*ssies And once again, Egypt and Kush never conquered areas of the Middle East. Yes, but the third statue is iberian (with typical clothes, jewels and ornaments) |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
Having one or two black ancestors does not make one black. Really? Funny how mainstream Africanist theories happen to be supported by many in the scientific community, no? It still amazes me how people still perceive North Africans to be "Europeans with some "Negro" admixture" and not "Africans with some Eurasian admixture". After all their African ancestry predates the presence of Eurasian gene-flow. ---------- Post added 2011-08-11 at 14:10 ---------- Hannibal was white (Med). Carthage was run by it's Phoenician (white Med) higher class. Funny thing people can claim Phoenicians and even ancient Hebrews to have been black. Every single artwork of themselves show that they were Caucasoids. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Coastal NA Berbers / Maghrebians. I know they're a hodge-podge of lineages though. If they feel connected to Iberia, why not? Don't Southern Europeans feel warmth for them in return? Hell no! Maghrebians are the most discriminated group in much of Europe, did you see the Italian reaction of the Tunisian immigrants? Not hating btw. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
And once again, Egypt and Kush never conquered areas of the Middle East. Could you back up that information? Come to think of it, there is only putative evidence on record: Whenever he encountered a courageous enemy who fought valiently for freedom, he erected pillars on the spot inscribed with his own name and country, and a sentence to indicate that by the might of his armed forces he had won the victory; if, however, a town fell easily into his hands without a struggle he made an addition to the inscription on the pillar ![]() ![]() Most of the memorial pillars which King Sesostris erected in conquered countries have disappeared, but I have seen some myself in Palestin, with the inscription I mentioned and the drawing of a woman's genitals. In Ionia also there are two images of Sesostris cut on rock, one on the road from Ephesus to Phocaea, the other between Sardis and Smyrna; in each case, the carved figure is nearly seven feet high and represents a man with a spear in his right hand and a bow in his left, and the rest of his equipment to match -- partly Egyptian partly Ethiopian. Across the breast from shoulder to shoulder runs an inscription, cut in the Egyptian sacred script: by the strenght of my shoulders I won this land. - Ancient Historian Herodotus This (purely historiography) is not my ideal type of source for a claim, though. I'd prefer an actual monument testimony signifying genitals still existed. ![]() (: |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Sure. Do you call that Egypt influencing the Middle East? There was a continual flow for centuries and even millenias from the Middle East to Egypt, while there was no such flow from Egypt to the Middle East. Egyptians even speak a Semitic language today. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
Thank you for your "evidence" from a Hellenic writer who lived some 2000 years after the death of King Sesostris. And you're welcome. ![]() The Middle East influenced Egypt and Kush ever since Assyria conquered Egypt. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
The ancient Mesopotamian and Levantine (Fertile Crescent) civilizations arose much earlier than ancient Egypt and Assyria conquered and destroyed Egypt. Ancient Egypt was a significant historical civilization however it's vastly overshadowed by the ancient Fertile Crescent civilizations and their lasting influence is far greater than Egypt's. Anyone that denies that is ignorant of history, just go ahead and confirm it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
That's because of their sheer numbers (largest immigrant group) + Islamophobia ..nothing racial really. ---------- Post added 2011-08-11 at 17:39 ---------- Thank you for your "evidence" from a Hellenic writer who lived some 2000 years after the death of King Sesostris. ![]() ---------- Post added 2011-08-11 at 17:45 ---------- The ancient Mesopotamian and Levantine (Fertile Crescent) civilizations arose much earlier than ancient Egypt and Assyria conquered and destroyed Egypt. Ancient Egypt was a significant historical civilization however it's vastly overshadowed by the ancient Fertile Crescent civilizations and their lasting influence is far greater than Egypt's. Anyone that denies that is ignorant of history, just go ahead and confirm it. Assyria conquered an already wounded Egypt, and then lost it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
The ancient Mesopotamian and Levantine (Fertile Crescent) civilizations arose much earlier than ancient Egypt and Assyria conquered and destroyed Egypt. Ancient Egypt was a significant historical civilization however it's vastly overshadowed by the ancient Fertile Crescent civilizations and their lasting influence is far greater than Egypt's. Anyone that denies that is ignorant of history, just go ahead and confirm it. ---------- Post added 2011-08-11 at 17:51 ---------- Even then, my statement stands... Southern Europeans don't and have never considered North Africans "brothers". |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
Do you call that Egypt influencing the Middle East? There was a continual flow for centuries and even millenias from the Middle East to Egypt, while there was no such flow from Egypt to the Middle East. The expansion of Afrasan into the Middle East was via Egypt The expansion of Afrasan speaking people into the Middle East was via Egypt; this movement of people led to the events that preceded the Neolithic revolution. The expansion of African admixture and most importantly E1b1b and M1 into the Middle East was via Egypt The origin of most of the worlds written scripts (including much of the Middle East) is in Egypt The conquest of the Levant by Egypt etc. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|