LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-22-2011, 10:15 AM   #21
casinobonusa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
596
Senior Member
Default
The more limited the fighting sport, the better are the non-whites. MMA is dominated by caucasoid fighters since it has few limitations.

Off topic--I am blown away by this new Jones dude in the UFC! He is going to be better than Silva, mark my words. His reach, power and athletic ability are unequalled. He may be the best fighter I've ever seen. The way he dominated Shogun was beyond impressive!
casinobonusa is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:35 AM   #22
SoOW2LeA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Boxing is not close to rel combat skills, when In real combat for life, it is necessary to employ all means possible to win. Therefore, MMA is very much realistic fighting style, it requires a gret amount of brain-power as well as physical power that is why very few blacks can stand up to hispanics and whites in MMA fights. MMA is not just a competition in terms of physical strength, also of intelligence.
SoOW2LeA is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:36 AM   #23
addyta.org

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
No fighting style will beat a gun ever.
addyta.org is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:42 AM   #24
Caursedus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Boxing is not close to rel combat skills, when In real combat for life, it is necessary to employ all means possible to win. Therefore, MMA is very much realistic fighting style, it requires a gret amount of brain-power as well as physical power that is why very few blacks can stand up to hispanics and whites in MMA fights. MMA is not just a competition in terms of physical strength, also of intelligence.
I have the sensation that with mma fighters yes they are more complete.. however boxers develop much more strengh on their arms and have the ability to land more power punches, i also think that the defense of Boxers is way more efective

Besides i think Boxers develop more tolerance to pain than MMA fighters..
Caursedus is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:43 AM   #25
nerkvcbtre

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, you´re right, the proof is Fedor Emelianenko

/irony
nerkvcbtre is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:46 AM   #26
autoloanexpert

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
Velasquez vs Lesnar support my theory

---------- Post added 2011-03-22 at 02:47 ----------

However Ufc sucks Boxing is way better.. Boxing is like formula 1 and Ufc is like Nascar
autoloanexpert is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:55 AM   #27
perhilzit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
I have the sensation that with mma fighters yes they are more complete.. however boxers develop much more strengh on their arms and have the ability to land more power punches, i also think that the defense of Boxers is way more efective

Besides i think Boxers develop more tolerance to pain than MMA fighters..
No, MMA fighting skills are derived from the some world martial philosophies which provide not only the art of fighting but also the
art of instant assassination. A good MMA fighter shall be able to kill his opponents instantly if needed. A Muay Thai fighter with a
light weight can easily deliver deadly blow to a heavy weight boxer in unlimited, unprotected fight. The pain tolerance means nothing
in real fight, the martial art is always mean to overcome natural barriers, and save ones trouble of pain in fighting.
perhilzit is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 11:03 AM   #28
fameintatenly

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Boxing historically attracts the poor from urban areas and the poor in urban areas are heavily Black and Hispanic in the US. To be properly spotted as a potential boxer you need to go to a boxing gym. Small towns in rural areas and the suburbs don't normally have these. Boxing also has a reputation as being low class. Notice how there are plenty of Whites involved in martial arts competitions. It's seen as more respectable and dojos, or whatever you call them, pop up everywhere.

I'd be curious to see who does well in England since they have a significant Black population.

However, I noticed that in the NHL the top two fighters of the last decade were Georges Laraque (Haitian-Canadian) and Donald Brashear (Black American/French Canadian). Both developed a reputation as "wrestlers" but Laraque was the best for many years and is the only player ever to destroy Chris Simon in a fight. Peter Worrell (Black Canadian) was a huge guy who won most of his fights. Sandy McCarthy (White, Black, Native Canadian) always ranked in the top five during most of his career.

Brashear was a strong above average fighter who won his fights by wrestling players off balance and throwing rabbit punches when up against a very good fighter (and even weaker fighters, actually). So his victories are more often that not lacking in making an impression but he did win most of his fights.

I love how he openly showed he feared Joey Kocur's killer right hand and ran away from Probert and Sandy McCarthy during his early years. He also never fought Twist while he played for Vancouver in the Western Conference and never fought Simon when he was Montreal. How can you be an enforcer for the Montreal Canadians and not fight the enforcer for their hated rivals the Quebec Nordiques (moved to Colorado, sadly) at some time? They fought in the minors once. Simon destroyed Brashear in that fight. It's on youtube.
fameintatenly is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 11:17 AM   #29
arriftell

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
What would be the response if Andrew Wiles said black people can't do math? Math is dominated by whites and east asians.
dont forget south asians like indians... they can be quite dark aswell...

---------- Post added 2011-03-22 at 04:18 ----------

Truth doesn't sin but is not comfortable either. I know blacks, hispanics are not outstanding in math, like white are not outstanding in many sports..

No offense to anybody i just want some explanation.

---------- Post added 2011-03-22 at 01:19 ----------



Another bum just like Chavez JR
lol, why are you quoting yourself..?
arriftell is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 08:23 PM   #30
fudelholf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
571
Senior Member
Default
In a time without modern technology, vitamins, and clothing, it is likely that African descended people would die outside of warmer climates because of lower body fat, less vitamin d absorption. Whites on the other hand would develop cancers and other ailments from too much exposure. Even Mediterraneans would have a more difficult time south of the Sahara with the diseases. No one is perfect, nor suited to all climates.
I agree, but Anatolians/Mesopotamians deserve a special mention, freezingly cold in the winter, really hot in the summer in those regions, and they cope without problems.
fudelholf is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 08:44 PM   #31
gundorana

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
The more limited the fighting sport, the better are the non-whites. MMA is dominated by caucasoid fighters since it has few limitations.

Off topic--I am blown away by this new Jones dude in the UFC! He is going to be better than Silva, mark my words. His reach, power and athletic ability are unequalled. He may be the best fighter I've ever seen. The way he dominated Shogun was beyond impressive!
Jon Jones is african-american and Anderson Silva is afro-brazilian. Suffering from cognitive dissonance?
gundorana is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 08:51 PM   #32
yurawerj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
Fighting sports attract minorities that have to fight to get through. The average middle class white kid can imagine better things to do in his spare time than hitting other people in the head and getting hit in the head by them. Same goes for middle class blacks.
yurawerj is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 08:53 PM   #33
jyhugikuhih

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
452
Senior Member
Default
Anyway do Steroids and i bet it wont matter if youre black white hispanic filipino you will knock out everbody
Just look at Manny Pacroid hahahaha
You mexicans never get over the fact that Pacquiao beat up all your mexican gods. Mexicans are too lazy to win a fight in the ring that is why Pacquiao beat up 10 mexicans in a raw.
jyhugikuhih is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 09:23 PM   #34
weaddercaps

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
594
Senior Member
Default
MMA is very much realistic fighting style, it requires a gret amount of brain-power as well as physical power that is why very few blacks can stand up to hispanics and whites in MMA fights. MMA is not just a competition in terms of physical strength, also of intelligence.
So why is it that there are no asian MMA champions?

Just for your information you ignorant fool, of the 7 current MMA Champions in the UFC 3 are black, 2 white and 2 hispanic. And of the top five pound for pound MMA fighters today 3 are black, 2 are white and all 5 are from the american continent:

1. Anderson Silva: Brazilian, black

2. George St Pierre: French-Canadian, white

3. Jon Jones: American, black

4. Jose Aldo; Brazilian, part-black

5. Frankie Edgar: Italian-American, white.
weaddercaps is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 09:35 PM   #35
dmoiknlasd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Go Pacquiao...the Mexicutioner!
dmoiknlasd is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 09:56 PM   #36
konanoileaski

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
Fighting sports attract minorities that have to fight to get through. The average middle class white kid can imagine better things to do in his spare time than hitting other people in the head and getting hit in the head by them. Same goes for middle class blacks.
Same probably goes for middle class hispanics as well. So? If you followed MMA you would know that whites constitute the great majority of the contestants, but increasingly the Champions tend to be New World blacks, hispanics, mixed race. As I mentioned in my previous post 2 of the 7 Champions in the UFC are white, 2 are hispanic, 3 are black. In Strikeforce of the 5 current Champions none are white:

Strikeforce Champions:

Heavyweight: Alistair Overeem, Dutch
Light Heavyweight: Dan Henderson, American
Middleweight: Ronaldo Souza, Brazilian
Welterweight: Nick Diaz, American
Lightweight: Gilbert Melendez, American
konanoileaski is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:04 PM   #37
Kitdowstyhodo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
It doesn't matter what races are dominating boxing because unfortunately, boxing is a dying sport. To many promoters and such that are greedy have just killed the sport. You can't even watch a fight unless you buy it on pay-per-view or have purchased HBO....all in the name of a buck. You can thank people like Don King for the downfall of this great sport.
Kitdowstyhodo is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:08 PM   #38
joOEMcheapSOFTWARE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Same probably goes for middle class hispanics as well. So? If you followed MMA you would know that whites constitute the great majority of the contestants, but increasingly the Champions tend to be New World blacks, hispanics, mixed race. As I mentioned in my previous post 2 of the 7 Champions in the UFC are white, 2 are hispanic, 3 are black. In Strikeforce of the 5 current Champions none are white:

Strikeforce Champions:

Heavyweight: Alistair Overeem, Dutch
Light Heavyweight: Dan Henderson, American
Middleweight: Ronaldo Souza, Brazilian
Welterweight: Nick Diaz, American
Lightweight: Gilbert Melendez, American
I don't follow MMA but deep rooted agression is surely a plus in fighting sports. Whites from minority groups like Armenians are also succesful in fighting sports.
joOEMcheapSOFTWARE is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:08 PM   #39
Brainpole

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Boxing is dominated by hispanics and blacks.. that's why the created the MMA & UFC according to Floyd Mayweather JR..

What do you think of this?





I think the Klitschko's Brothers are great smart fighters.. but if u ask me i dont think they can handle a prime time Heavy weight as Tyson, Lewis or Bowe

However Ricky Hatton is the average anglo who only lost to the best 2 p4p

What do u think of the topic in general
Who gives a fuck, who cares about some primitive fighting brutes.
Brainpole is offline


Old 03-22-2011, 10:21 PM   #40
erroxiainsona

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
what about mixed people?
which side makes blake griffen the player he is? the "black side" or the "white side"

or a lil bit of both?
Honestly, Kevin Love is way more productive than Griffin (on a per-minute basis), he manages to generate way more possessions for his team. The problem with the Timberwolves is that they're very inefficient as a whole. They lead the league in turnovers and are one of the worst shooting teams (even when looking @ eFG%). So, although Love's very good at generating possessions (possessions = opportunities to score), with poor shooting and poor ball handling from the rest of the team, those "opportunities" mostly go to waste.

Love would be better suited playing for an efficient ball club (e.g., Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles―the good one―Orlando, Miami, or San Antonio). He probably wouldn't put up those scoring numbers, but the man would still get his rebounds.

So what you think, do he got BASE?

On a side note, him and Dwight are my two favorite players (I'm a big CP3 fan too).
erroxiainsona is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity