LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-13-2012, 08:20 PM   #1
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
More media bias:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...kland-raiders/
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 07-13-2012, 09:10 PM   #2
Wgnhqhlg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
Obviously. The fact that they haven't done anything in years should say a lot to the potential seen in this team. #1 all the way.
Wgnhqhlg is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 08:27 AM   #3
Wgnhqhlg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
That was funny right. I like how he blamed it on a Media Bias against the silver and black.

The countdown was the top 100 players as voted by the players.
Wgnhqhlg is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 08:51 AM   #4
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Ponder has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game either. SWEET, the vikings have a top five NFL player at the QB position
If nothing else, it says a lot to the potential seen in this athlete.
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 12:40 PM   #5
Keendwainge

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
If they are on the raiders, they are good enough for the top 100 - they should have 53 spots. Maybe a couple from their practice squad too, so lets go with 55 spots.
clearly justblogbaby screwed the pooch and was too unkind to the raiders .
Keendwainge is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 02:42 PM   #6
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default The NFL Top 100 List messed up!
Not enough Raiders!

http://justblogbaby.com/2012/07/11/r...ayers-of-2012/
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 03:48 PM   #7
Wgnhqhlg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
At least 8. Palmer and the wide receivers just missed. But they probably are worthy now due to McFadden.
If they are on the raiders, they are good enough for the top 100 - they should have 53 spots. Maybe a couple from their practice squad too, so lets go with 55 spots.
Wgnhqhlg is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 05:12 PM   #8
freeringsf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
clearly justblogbaby screwed the pooch and was too unkind to the raiders .
Part of the media bias right there.
freeringsf is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 09:35 PM   #9
Wgnhqhlg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
5: Darren McFadden – Due to his injury issues I just didn’t feel right placing Mcfadden lower than 5. The fact is this player has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game. That should say a lot to the potential seen in this athlete.

Dude is right. Based on this infallible logic, Beanie Wells should be ranked in the top 10 as well.
Ponder has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game either. SWEET, the vikings have a top five NFL player at the QB position
Wgnhqhlg is offline


Old 09-21-2012, 10:10 PM   #10
freeringsf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
So the average team would have roughly three players in the top 100, but the Raiders deserve seven or eight. Got it.
freeringsf is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 12:23 AM   #11
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
And their opinions are obviously skewed because they're inundated with anti-Raider propaganda year-in and year-out in the media.
5: Darren McFadden – Due to his injury issues I just didn’t feel right placing Mcfadden lower than 5. The fact is this player has yet to be in a super bowl, break any NFL records, or win a playoff game. That should say a lot to the potential seen in this athlete.

Dude is right. Based on this infallible logic, Beanie Wells should be ranked in the top 10 as well.
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 02:49 AM   #12
pipitous

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
That was funny right. I like how he blamed it on a Media Bias against the silver and black.

The countdown was the top 100 players as voted by the players.
And their opinions are obviously skewed because they're inundated with anti-Raider propaganda year-in and year-out in the media.
pipitous is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 03:13 AM   #13
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
So the average team would have roughly three players in the top 100, but the Raiders deserve seven or eight. Got it.
At least 8. Palmer and the wide receivers just missed. But they probably are worthy now due to McFadden.
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 05:40 AM   #14
Wgnhqhlg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
413
Senior Member
Default
So the average team would have roughly three players in the top 100, but the Raiders deserve seven or eight. Got it.
Of course they should, if it weren't for that Media Bias
Wgnhqhlg is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 06:47 AM   #15
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
That was funny right. I like how he blamed it on a Media Bias against the silver and black.

The countdown was the top 100 players as voted by the players.
I was going to post that very thing in the comments, but didn't want to register for whatever blog site he uses.
RCQDnMp5 is offline


Old 09-22-2012, 07:18 AM   #16
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
clearly justblogbaby screwed the pooch and was too unkind to the raiders .
He missed the entire back seven. Aaron Curry was a number 4 overall pick who has accomplished nothing in this league so far.
That should say a lot to the potential seen in him.
RCQDnMp5 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity