LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-15-2006, 03:38 AM   #1
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
Hey FSG,
One personal question. Whats ur nationality?

But one thing i and others would be happy about FSG posting is the One-India (a Greater Tamilnadu extending from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and from Gujarat to Assam.) policy he maintains. This clearly refutes the fact (some tamil supremos's) that there was never a One-India before british rule.

Indian twotwofourzeroeightzero, what is yours? You are not even a Tamil! Is there a sanskrit nationality?
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 10-29-2005, 07:00 AM   #2
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
What a biased thought!

It is height of ignorance or hieght of " "! Sorry I dont have words to comment this. Mr. Vandayaar, I see nothing short of hatred in your thread. You can even interprt "America" to be based on a Tamizh word! Keep it up!
Beerinkol is offline


Old 02-23-2006, 06:37 AM   #3
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
So what about Dwarka's ruins ??

Gujarat is not South India.
Peptobismol is offline


Old 02-23-2006, 06:40 AM   #4
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
51
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
But what is sure about Mahabharatha is that South Indians can be identified as beeing the Pandavas.
Big A is offline


Old 03-06-2006, 04:01 AM   #5
PhillipHer

Join Date
Jun 2008
Age
59
Posts
4,481
Senior Member
Default
-deleted-
hi
PhillipHer is offline


Old 03-06-2006, 04:41 AM   #6
Lillie_Steins

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
4,508
Senior Member
Default
well i have heard that ....keeping a MAHABHARATAM BOOK AT HOME COULD CREATE FAMILY PROBLEMS ?

i dint say it .

i heard it
Lillie_Steins is offline


Old 03-06-2006, 10:17 PM   #7
Fegasderty

Join Date
Mar 2008
Posts
5,023
Senior Member
Default
Friendsm

we need to look at One India, and we have Tamil Sangam Literature which confirms the great Vedic And Epic Traditions.

Archealogy confirms from Dwaraka and other places.

Tamil Pandya King arranged for TRanslation of Mahabaratha to Tamil in BCE 200 AS per Velvikudi Copper Plates.

Devapriya.
Fegasderty is offline


Old 03-25-2006, 05:56 AM   #8
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
Friendsm

we need to look at One India, and we have Tamil Sangam Literature which confirms the great Vedic And Epic Traditions.

Archealogy confirms from Dwaraka and other places.

Tamil Pandya King arranged for TRanslation of Mahabaratha to Tamil in BCE 200 AS per Velvikudi Copper Plates.

Devapriya.
The timeline of ‘VELVIKUDI CHEPPEDU' is (710-775 CE) and not any BCE. Pallava King Nanthivarman II-Army Head Udayachandran was defeated by Pandian from the place Neduvarai to Kuzhumur – 7 villages. This is the message from this Cheppedu.

Refer -Pandian Nedunchadayan Paranthakan Velvikudi Cheppedukal by T.V. Sadasiva Pandaraththar, Pandiyar Varalaru, Page 3-4.

Solomon Devapriya Continue your lies,misinterpretations and selective quotings. Perhaps ‘Velvi’ tempted your Archaka mind. It is tamil Velvi and not artificial sanskrit Yaham where you may be given job.

Mahabharatham was copied from tamil and rewritten with imaginative stories in Sanskrit. Wait for my future postings containing such kind of copied versions in Sanskrit from all arts of tamils.

f.s.gandhi
Peptobismol is offline


Old 03-27-2006, 04:07 AM   #9
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Mahabharatha was written by Sri Vyasadeva(who is known as Badarayana, KrshnaDwaipayana and Veda Vyasa). This is older than any dravidian works known to date.
softy54534 is offline


Old 03-31-2006, 06:15 AM   #10
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
Dear Shoyonika,

You seems to be in imaginative world doing preachings as Rishis do. I have observed this from your postings. Visit old postings in this forum.

You cannot claim the Antiquity of Sanskrit without mentioning the timeline.

Good luck next time.

f.s.gandhi
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 04-01-2006, 06:08 AM   #11
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
54
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
hmm... but tamilnation lists perunthevanar as a 9th century poet?

http://www.tamilnation.org/literatur...rti/04epic.htm
9mm_fan is offline


Old 01-14-2006, 07:00 AM   #12
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
Friends.

Tholkappiyam Datings are now well acepted to 50CE, and further Tholkappiyar says
Vadasol kizavi
vadazezuthu Orie... When you use Sanskrit words, avoid Sanskrit letters such as Ja sha etc.,

Now FSG Lives in an imaginary world spreading venomic views.

Let him give proofs with Reputable Universities of any part of the world, and not few from a begotted club.

My mistake was that I must have said Chinnamanur seppadu.

Now FSG dates the Copper Plate to its date, then we do not have any MANuscript of Tamil that can be dated to earlier than 17th Cen, where as Sanskrit starts from Ist Cen. BCE.
Peptobismol is offline


Old 04-02-2006, 03:57 AM   #13
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
At the time Tolkaappiyam was written (more than 5 thousand years ago), the Rig Veda had not yet taken shape and if it had, it could have been floating around "orally". If, that is...
brraverishhh is offline


Old 04-04-2006, 04:38 AM   #14
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
Dear Gandhiji,
Imagination is what you do while writing and quoting books from tamil language. If necessary, do not hesitate to ask me the timeline of Samskrith works, and I wont deny your requests. But if you do not want to know about Samskrith works, it is completely your wish. As far your thoughts about Rishis are concerned, speak not about whom you know not. Never did they preach any imaginations.
Lastly I have lot of good-luck, received by critics of your like, now its your turn to be atleast a bit lucky if not fully, So, Good luck to you too.
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 04-04-2006, 07:11 AM   #15
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
interesting article by iraamaki...
http://valavu.blogspot.com/2006/04/blog-post.html
radikal is offline


Old 04-06-2006, 10:50 PM   #16
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default
Tamil and Sanskrit are two beautiful classical languages , and nobody can deny this fact.

I personnaly don't think to the rubbish division made by Max Mueller. Aryan/Dravidian.

Are we too much stupid to be fooled like that ?
softy54534 is offline


Old 04-08-2006, 08:52 AM   #17
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
Are we too much stupid to be fooled like that ?
unfortunately, yes we are.
why do you think we let someone who doesnt know neither of these languages to come up with some theory?
why do you think we even need approval from universities outside india?
why do you think we accept the supremacy of english, but fight over other indian languages?
why do you think we speak of peace, while fighting amongst ourselves?

In fact this forum would have easily come to a conclusion, if either of these sides had got an european to speak for them. we can not think logically and we are all like ten-year-olds who think that we should prove the others stupid (we do not know how to prove our superiority) to get the attention of grown-ups (europeans). Even today, they exploit us. we happily work for them. But we will not, at any cost, work for the development of our own people.

If you really want to find out the truth about these languages, you should study both the languages deeply, then compare both the languages. If you can read the ancient texts in both the languages without the help of others, you sure can compare both. till then, please stop.

does any one of us dare to accept truth?

I will apologize and bow to anyone who proves me wrong.
radikal is offline


Old 04-08-2006, 07:40 PM   #18
Fegasderty

Join Date
Mar 2008
Posts
5,023
Senior Member
Default
FS Gandhi

Why are you carrying VANDAYAR after your name ....

Is it some award or certificate of merit or it reflects your caste ??

Come on mate....you are carrying the name of the greatest Indian and you are so caste oriented even today ??????????????

Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others.......
Fegasderty is offline


Old 04-08-2006, 07:44 PM   #19
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
I respect Tamil as a very old language but it does not mean that one has to continue wondering about the past...

WHATS HAPPENING TODAY ?? which language is dominant ??

FSG think for a while...you will get the answer mannnnnn

Stop this nonsense thinking about Maabarath etc etc......

Looks like you are hard core Tamil separatist and anti national.....

No wonder you are in another country
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 04-08-2006, 09:46 PM   #20
Peptobismol

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
59
Posts
4,386
Senior Member
Default
Friends,

BISMALA AND FSG CARRIES CHILLING LIES WITH COLD BLOOD.

Tholkappiyam dating by them is not supported by any reason and now Objective Scholars date it close to 50CE.

Mahabaharatha is in Pre-Panini (BCE 5th Cen) Sanskrit and dated close to 600 BCE by Critical Scholars.

Tholkappiyam refers to Vedas, very clearly at many places and Sanskir much more times.

Why keep Lying.

Devapriya.
Peptobismol is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity