Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
Hey FSG, |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Friendsm Refer -Pandian Nedunchadayan Paranthakan Velvikudi Cheppedukal by T.V. Sadasiva Pandaraththar, Pandiyar Varalaru, Page 3-4. Solomon ![]() ![]() Mahabharatham was copied from tamil and rewritten with imaginative stories in Sanskrit. Wait for my future postings containing such kind of copied versions in Sanskrit from all arts of tamils. f.s.gandhi |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
hmm... but tamilnation lists perunthevanar as a 9th century poet?
http://www.tamilnation.org/literatur...rti/04epic.htm |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Friends.
Tholkappiyam Datings are now well acepted to 50CE, and further Tholkappiyar says Vadasol kizavi vadazezuthu Orie... When you use Sanskrit words, avoid Sanskrit letters such as Ja sha etc., Now FSG Lives in an imaginary world spreading venomic views. Let him give proofs with Reputable Universities of any part of the world, and not few from a begotted club. My mistake was that I must have said Chinnamanur seppadu. Now FSG dates the Copper Plate to its date, then we do not have any MANuscript of Tamil that can be dated to earlier than 17th Cen, where as Sanskrit starts from Ist Cen. BCE. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Dear Gandhiji,
Imagination is what you do while writing and quoting books from tamil language. If necessary, do not hesitate to ask me the timeline of Samskrith works, and I wont deny your requests. But if you do not want to know about Samskrith works, it is completely your wish. As far your thoughts about Rishis are concerned, speak not about whom you know not. Never did they preach any imaginations. Lastly I have lot of good-luck, received by critics of your like, now its your turn to be atleast a bit lucky if not fully, So, Good luck to you too. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
interesting article by iraamaki...
http://valavu.blogspot.com/2006/04/blog-post.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Are we too much stupid to be fooled like that ? why do you think we let someone who doesnt know neither of these languages to come up with some theory? why do you think we even need approval from universities outside india? why do you think we accept the supremacy of english, but fight over other indian languages? why do you think we speak of peace, while fighting amongst ourselves? In fact this forum would have easily come to a conclusion, if either of these sides had got an european to speak for them. we can not think logically and we are all like ten-year-olds who think that we should prove the others stupid (we do not know how to prove our superiority) to get the attention of grown-ups (europeans). Even today, they exploit us. we happily work for them. But we will not, at any cost, work for the development of our own people. If you really want to find out the truth about these languages, you should study both the languages deeply, then compare both the languages. If you can read the ancient texts in both the languages without the help of others, you sure can compare both. till then, please stop. does any one of us dare to accept truth? I will apologize and bow to anyone who proves me wrong. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
FS Gandhi
Why are you carrying VANDAYAR after your name .... Is it some award or certificate of merit or it reflects your caste ?? Come on mate....you are carrying the name of the greatest Indian and you are so caste oriented even today ?????????????? Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others....... |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
I respect Tamil as a very old language but it does not mean that one has to continue wondering about the past...
WHATS HAPPENING TODAY ?? which language is dominant ?? FSG think for a while...you will get the answer mannnnnn Stop this nonsense thinking about Maabarath etc etc...... Looks like you are hard core Tamil separatist and anti national..... No wonder you are in another country |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Friends,
BISMALA AND FSG CARRIES CHILLING LIES WITH COLD BLOOD. Tholkappiyam dating by them is not supported by any reason and now Objective Scholars date it close to 50CE. Mahabaharatha is in Pre-Panini (BCE 5th Cen) Sanskrit and dated close to 600 BCE by Critical Scholars. Tholkappiyam refers to Vedas, very clearly at many places and Sanskir much more times. Why keep Lying. Devapriya. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|